Thread by @cburniske

@devilninja777 @WeekendSlackers @decredproject - More secure design w/ PoS check & balance layered on top of PoW. (Certainly, Bitcoin's more secure rn b/c it's much bigger, but Decred's design is better).
- Long term funding model for devs baked into protocol
- Fork-resistant, avoiding headaches is going thru w/ etc

@devilninja777 @WeekendSlackers @decredproject As a long-term SoV, then, has the potential to be more secure, better funded, and more fork resistant than .

@devilninja777 @WeekendSlackers @decredproject What has that can't *take* from it is its liquidity/salability, primarily a result of #bitcoin pricing all other cryptoassets over time. can *lose* that, tho, if forks get too confusing, pure PoW shows cracks, or funding scarcity leads to protocol neglect.

@devilninja777 @WeekendSlackers @decredproject But I don't approach #Decred as a #Bitcoin killer -- we've all seen that story too many times. Both can, and 🤞 will be, massive successes.

@devilninja777 @WeekendSlackers @decredproject Right now, = *best alternative SoV* to , led by same devs who created primary alternative to Core (ie, BTCsuite). IMO the world won't rely on a single SoV cryptoasset, too risky. More likely 80/20 split for SoV's. 80% is 's to lose, 20% 's to win. Big market 🙂

@devilninja777 @WeekendSlackers @decredproject For more, here's @placeholdervc's original thesis post on @decredproject: placeholder.vc/blog/2018/5/12…

@alexhevans analyst report on it: static1.squarespace.com/static/5a479ee…

As should be clear and has been stated in lots of places, we hold . We also hold . Those are our SoV allocations.