Tomorrow is the two-year anniversary of publication of this article.
Read it again. Every word.
nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/…
Read it again. Every word.
nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/…
Then watch this, from 3 months earlier. Before the RNC forced him to walk it back.
Some highlights:
an overview
an overview
Russia also stole the primaries for Trump.
And all things GOP being breached in summer 2015, a time everybody would have been gossiping and strategizing about Hastert's conviction, revealing their prior knowledge of his crimes against children... must just be a total coincidence, eh?
And if you don't believe me... check out my new friends who independently arrived at the same conclusion.
medium.com/@leannewattphd…
medium.com/@leannewattphd…
Then watch @Reince's response to the NYT article up top again.
That, my friends, I believe we can cast as a fraudulent claim, one that has been testified to in open hearings.
That, my friends, I believe we can cast as a fraudulent claim, one that has been testified to in open hearings.
So. Let's see tomorrow how much wiser the past two years have made us.
@GStephanopoulos @chucktodd - might I suggest a 10-15min block of the discussion of What Manafort + Cohen Know tomorrow be pointed at this topic?
'Cause they know about this.
cc @leannewattphd @RWPUSA
@GStephanopoulos @chucktodd - might I suggest a 10-15min block of the discussion of What Manafort + Cohen Know tomorrow be pointed at this topic?
'Cause they know about this.
cc @leannewattphd @RWPUSA
In any case, I'm sure that the eventual court cases will reveal plenty of interesting conversations that popped up Sept 14, 2016, starting around 6:16pm. And if Mueller has just one key player's emails... 🤓
