,
3 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Searching for publications by Intelligent Design Creationist Michael Behe gives three hits:
1. A 2004 paper on protein evolution.
2. A 2005 letter acknowledging flaws in the 2004 paper.
3. A 2009 correction to his 2008 paper that used the wrong values for fixation rates.
1. A 2004 paper on protein evolution.
2. A 2005 letter acknowledging flaws in the 2004 paper.
3. A 2009 correction to his 2008 paper that used the wrong values for fixation rates.
I'm always struck not by how controversial or challenging intelligent design creationism is, but how *unproductive* it has been. They even started their own journal and can't seem to get many papers out even when they are author, reviewer, editor and publisher in one.
If a creationist wanted to convince me, they wouldn't wave Paley's Watch arguments in front of me. They'd apply a creation paradigm to intractable research problems and show that those paradigms were productive.
They have scientists, funding, a journal... what's stopping them?
They have scientists, funding, a journal... what's stopping them?
