Profile picture
iigmir
@iigmir
, 5 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
一切都要從日文漫畫開始。

某些日文漫畫的台詞，旁邊會有點點。我想應該是用作強調。但台灣幾乎沒有強調點的用法，所以閱讀上，多少有點驚奇與困惑。
最近查了下網路會怎麼強調某些東西，才發現日文把這種東西叫做圏点（けんてん）。

ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9C%8F…
接著我發現，中文事實上也有類似圏点的東西：著重號。但是台灣教育部，並不認同這個標點符號；如果想強調什麼的話，按照台灣教育部提供的用法，這要用引號。

zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%9D%80…
language.moe.gov.tw/001/upload/fil…
英文等西方文字有斜體與粗體能用：HTML 的 <strong> 與 <em> 正是為此而生。兩者的區別？我的理解是：斜體用於普通程度的強調、粗體的強調程度更強烈。

practicaltypography.com/bold-or-italic…
最後，關於強調這回事：

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emphasis_…
blog.justfont.com/2014/01/popula…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to iigmir
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Related threads

Profile picture
questo non è un uovo
@PMO_W
Se uno vuole rendersi conto del ruolo reazionario e di propaganda del Potere svolto da #Wikipedia, esatto opposto funzionale della Encyclopédie, può per esempio leggere la seguente, impegnata a smontare l'unica tesi logica, quella giornalistica: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St…
La voce, frutto di un ventennio di elaborazione, sta dalla parte del Potere e della sua Propaganda di Guerra e contro il rasoio di Occam.
Quando #Wikileaks pubblica #CollateralMurder con documenti originali del Potere, il giochino usato dalle fonti predilette da Wikipedia, crolla
E quali sono le fonti predilette da Wikipedia (e dalla antitesi del giornalismo di inchiesta che sono i debunker professionisti)? Le veline dei governi occidentali distribuite dalle Betulle e le dichiarazioni, prese face value, degli stessi politici rappresentanti del Potere.
Read 9 tweets
Profile picture
Markus Pössel
@mpoessel
If you're angry about the recent deletion of articles by @jesswade from #Wikipedia, there is a way to help. Of course, that way is also open to you if you are not angry about those deletions: Help to edit Wikipedia. 1/n
After all, Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit"! Only that it's not that simple, of course. It's easy to become enthusiastic about contributing to Wikipedia, start editing, have some really frustrating encounters with other members of the community, and 2/n
then leave because who needs that kind of aggravation when they are just trying to volunteer for something? This thread is about how to do good things on Wikipedia and avoid at least some of the frustration-inducing pitfalls. 3/n
Read 85 tweets
Profile picture
Antoine Blanchard
@Enroweb
Découvrez mon top 10 (top 9 en réalité…) des lectures scientifiques de l'année 2018 #bonneannée enroweb.com/blogsciences/i…
Deux romans sur Galilée figurent dans cette liste : l'occasion d'un petit thread sur le procès de Galilée ⤵️ analysé par l'historien Thomas Dixon dans son manuel "Science and Religion: An Introduction" global.oup.com/academic/produ…
On résume souvent le procès de Galilée à une victoire de l'obscurantisme religieux et une défaite de la démarche scientifique, preuve que ces deux systèmes de pensée incompatibles seraient enfermés dans un affrontement idéologique. En réalité cet épisode est plus ambiguë.
Read 17 tweets
Profile picture
BugM
@bugdavem
Wikipedia edit histories sometimes throw up some interesting information. For the uninitiated, anyone can edit a Wikipedia page but it will get vetted & corrected at times even by bots. PR gurus or even interested parties themselves often curate pages to avoid negative entries 1/
Let’s take @Keithaschembri’s Wikipedia page as an example.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Sch… 2/
The information on the page looks a little curious and perhaps overly positive (seriously who cares about the Kasco group?). In fact the page is tagged as having “issues”. 3/
Read 18 tweets
Profile picture
David Attali
@David_Attali_
Plagier #Wikipedia pour remplir un magazine, certains en ont rêvé, le "Magazine de l’Aviation" l’a fait !

Des pages entières sont d’authentiques copiés-collés d’articles de Wikipedia.

Un thread pour dénoncer ces pratiques honteuses ⤵️⤵️⤵️
Commençons avec un article sur l’histoire de Boeing. Tout va bien. Sauf que ledit article est repris quasi intégralement de l’article de Wikipedia :

Cerise sur le gâteau : les titres des paragraphes sont identiques à ceux de Wikipedia (copy-paste oblige).
Le "magazine" liste ensuite les différents modèles d'avions qui ont marqué l'histoire de Boeing. Et là, ô surprise, 100% des textes sont plagiés.

Sources : fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_247
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_314
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_37…
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_307

Quelques exemples :
Read 9 tweets

Trending hashtags

#coincidence #thèseFatigueThèseUsée #PederastiaClerical #KarlLagerfeld #ファイヤー・ジャングル #DeGioia #DOJ #Bertone #YellowVests #pederasta #Encíclicas #Maciel #Santiago #LarsUlrich #LaVerdadNosHaráLibres #DeepState #Irapuato #Laicos #Jullundur #WashingtonPost #Big #DDHH #MarcOuellet #Washington #gifAvecLiensTénu
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!