Here’s one.
Insane? Or obviously true?

I stand by what I said. Secularism is a deformed lens which radically distorts reality.




Still not seeing evidence for Dean being insane because I said this. It seems entirely reasonable to me. Why should “I’m too old” be a valid reason to not change your mind, if you receive new information?

Everyone knows that ONLY Catholics are pedophiles, right?
@OdaStOda, did you know you were insane for thinking pedophilia is a problem?

You could CLAIM Christians lie to not be associated with Nazis, but do Nazis lie not to be associated with us?

No, we Christians worship a Jew as God incarnate. That doesn’t go well with Nazism. Nor our whole “love your enemy” core principle.
I think this kind of direct assault is a bad idea, although Max has a point: in a healthy society, atheists should be regarded with a mix of pity and contempt.




“Faith” in the Christian tradition does not and has never meant “believe without evidence.”
Atheists who define it thus, and impute it to Christians 𝙖𝙨 𝙞𝙛 it is our belief are being disingenuous.
It is "Atheistsplaining."


I was making the same point as Peter Hitchens, the smarter Hitchens.
Does that make me an “Islamophobe”?
Let’s ask Christopher. And the Maverick Philosopher.




It works too, given the standard definition of knowledge as justified true belief and Krauss’ claim that he (and atheists generally) have no beliefs.


Start from this tweet and make a sound logical argument to the conclusion “Dean Esmay is insane.”
I dare you.

If only there were other philosophers who had held such naughty opinions!
Oh, wait.


St. Thomas argues that religion is a virtue, and not one can be a fully actualized human being while missing a human virtue.
QED.

