I'll be covering it live for @CourthouseNews.
(Interrupt this legal live-feed for an amateur weather report.)
Judge Oetken is entering the courtroom.
The attorneys introduce themselves for the record.
AUSA Douglas Zolkind describes discovery as "voluminous."
Nov. 21: It included a "substantial volume" of docs obtained by subpoena, phone records, bank records, internet providers like Google and Facebook, and proved by witnesses.
He moves onto evidence pursuant to the search warrants, on emails, iCloud, and physical premises.
"Certainly, there is additional stuff that's coming."
Zolkind replies that's correct.
(There weren't.)
Oetken notes that would be early February. That's not including other evidence not yet in prosecutors' possession.
Fruman's attorney Todd Blanche hits a similar point.
"I'm concerned about the time it's going to take," Blanche says. "I don't know what the court should do."
Blanche notes that the government continues to investigate grand jury subpoenas that are out there.
"They indicted the case prepared to go to trial based on the evidence they had, presumably," Harrington said.
Lefcourt requests a non-binding draft exhibit list.
He says they have received numerous search warrants, which previews the government's evidence.
There's a sealed ex-parte application, he notes.
The prosecutor says obliquely that the redacted material "do not relate to the charged case."
"The unredacted pages are a pretty detailed guide to the evidence in this case," he adds.
The prosecutor notes they were arrested in October, and we're now in December.
"That is not a significant passage of time," he says.
"There is an ongoing investigation," he notes.
Providing witness statement prematurely would "risk compromising" that investigation, he adds.
The defendants can always supplement their motions based on what discovery turns up, Zolkind argues.
"Some of these things are going to be in foreign languages. I think we have Russian and maybe Ukrainian as well for some of this stuff."
"We're not intending to hide the ball," Zolkind says, adding that the government will answer any request from the defense seeking guidance.
Zolkind: "We think a superseding indictment is likely, but no decision has been made, certainly."
Judge Oetken proposes a Feb. 3 conference, which happens to be my birthday.
It will be that date at 2 p.m.
Happy birthday to me.
Prosecutor Zolkind notes those requests also would be subject to a protective order.
"I certainly expect to grant that request," Oetken says, adding that he hopes prosecutors will turn it over ASAP.
"We will," Zolkind says.