Thread by @EricRWeinstein

I’m not delusional here. As anyone who follows this feed knows, I’m far more interested in the issue of ending “The Truman Show” than in who becomes president. There are three candidates that challenge the party leadership: Tulsi, Yang & Sanders. Yang has only one possible path.

https://twitter.com/Junah_B/status/1224427838964502528

It is very simple. The MSM and DNC have been VERY effective at killing off the sense he *can* win. For Yang to take off, he would need to ride a wave of preference falsification. For example, if he did twice as well as expected for a while, the polls would become suspect to all.

I don’t see this for Tulsi, and Sanders has already ridden such a wave from 2016. So the question is simple.

Q: Are enough Yang supporters:

A) Invisible to Polls

and/or

B) Contingent on realism concerns

and/or

C) Lying about supporting Biden/Sanders Warren.

I don’t know.

But that’s how this would explode IF possible. Frankly, I don’t see another path. It’s a *very* long shot. But the one thing that‘s been truly weird is the amount of credibility that MSM spent on #YangMediaBlackout. It may have stopped him from polling higher, but at great cost.

The only way that makes sense is if:

A) He once had a chance which is now gone due to the finger on the scales via #YangMediaBlackout

Or

B) Media knows that he’s still got hidden support as per the above.

But I’m not playing pick the winner. I’m focused on #EndTheTrumanShow

I’ve been focused on this since before 2016 and this is why @timurkuran was my 3rd interview. This is about the potential energy that can be stored in a system. I can’t measure it for you. No one can.

But my thinking has been here in the open for months: