Thread by @ForKevansSake

@nytimes Hey there, spotted a very likely mistake in your data presentation for Polk - Des Moines 14. S.D.E. for Sanders and Warren appears to be switched, based on final alignment numbers. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

Also confused by this result in Clinton - Eden Camanche Twp. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

Also interesting data shown for Kossuth GW-SN. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

And in Warren - Liberty Twp. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

And in Johnson - Cedar Township #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

And Clinton - Liberty Toronto. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

Also Muscatine - Orono City. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

And Scott - (BF) City of Buffalo. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

And Polk - Des Moines 72. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

Woodbury - 43 Oto/Oto Township. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

Dubuque - Dubuque 44 #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

Jefferson - Penn-Pleasant Plain. #IowaCaucuses #IowaCaucuses2020

@nytimes @iowademocrats @DNC Are we able to clarify if these mistakes are directly from the Iowa Democratic Party or were made in error by NY Times? Just want to make sure these get corrected, especially given the concern for how the results as a whole have been released. Thanks!

@nytimes @iowademocrats Those are all of the obvious errors I could find with 86% of precincts in.

Also to be clear: I’m Canadian and, while I’m rooting for Bernie in this nomination process, I just want the data to be correct for everyone — particularly so with the @iowademocrats having stated that it was important for them to get everything right before publishing results.

@krystalball @esaagar @ryangrim @thehill #Rising

ummmm...

thoughts?

🙃

In lieu of thoughts, Saagar snickers will also be accepted. #Rising