If we loose the entire conference season - as looks likely - we are going to have to find alternatives. Perhaps @AcademicsLaw and @legalscholars could explore virtual conferences/workshops this year - with the advantage of inherent international collaboration
Given the theme of the @AcademicsLaw conference is the future of the legal academy, this seems particularly appropriate
I would love to have an e-workshop on twitter and the law - I know there was a US conference on this theme a few years back -i think @lawprofblawg was involved
There are some excellent emerging scholars who have been really effective in using Twitter to lift their profile and build networks - @_LisaParker@LiamElphick_@juliettemm@katejmclachlan are just a couple that jump to mind
A view from Uni Admi would be great too - perhaps @Marnie_HW or @lesleyhitchens could dial in and express their view; @BJRichards8 could discuss how LADRN and CALD can better engage here
And this is not even scratching the surface of US and UK contributors - in many ways #lawtwitter is even more engaged there
There are sooooo many fabulous twitterati out there in the legal academy, I can't possibly list them all. Thanks to every one who makes #lawtwitter fabulous. It is great to engage with you, and would be wonderful to meet you in a virtual conference at least (if not in person)
You could have panels with a few speakers on Zoom. Others can dial in and watch, then questions from the audience. Make sure you schedule time for social discussions - "tea breaks" in virtual break out rooms. Key note talks
All virtual. People from across the globe. Grand
I have just noticed my terrible spelling in this. Though the image of a whole academic year flapping loose in the winds of pandemic is kinda appropriate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A 🧵 on managing expectations in #academia#highereducation (from my own painfully learnt experiences)
#AcademicTwitter, I accidently deleted my earlier popular pinned thread. I thought it was a good excuse to repost, but with some further reflections (older/wiser?)
These are tips that I wish I had learnt earlier - I hope they help a few of you struggling with the many demands of academic life in long, dragging #pandemic where academic life is increasingly under acute pressure and everything feels extra hard
In the article we examine the pivots to remote hearings our courts have undertaken, and probe the issues of public law and good judicial administration that arise with this shift. We also flag the opportunities for future reform presented by this profound cultural shift
The changes in judicial practices in the last 6 months have been profound - and there are as many challenges ahead as there are opportunities that have been created. This is a needed conversation for all those with an interest in judicial studies, practice and administration.
THREAD ON HIGHER ED: This wonderful article by Lynda Ng is a must read for anyone working in (or interested in) higher education in Australia. It exposes the fundamental misconceptions that have plauged the corporatisation of our Universites.
I look forward to hearing @AmeliaLoughland response to this - what a great thing for the work of young graduate to invite such a detailed response from leaders in empirical judicial studies t
This type of scholarship is still new in Australia, and we are still probing out the uses and limits of it. However, like all legal scholarship it should be discursive. The debate is enriched by disagreement and counter analysis
There appear to be methodological differences between the two studies- though this needs to be unpacked. It seems that most of the concern with loughland piece is that the sample was unrepresentative and that propositions went beyond the data.
Great #proudson moment today. My Dad is appearing in the @HighCourtofAus in the important native title case NLC v Quall - concerning native title, improper delegation and representative governance.
This cases has been a long fight for important principles of properly engaging traditional owners in decisions directly affecting their right.