My Authors
Read all threads
I have this dream that he gets up there with the task force behind him, and after his rambling boasts in a language that sounds like English run through a wood chipper, the moment for questions comes— and no one asks him a damn thing. All the Q's go to the people who know stuff.
Having thought it through as many ways as I can, my conclusion is that there is no justification — from within the public service logic of journalism — for continuing with coronavirus questions to Trump in the briefing room. The results are not just misleading, they are harmful.
No justification for the briefing room ritual IF the goal is to inform the public and equip people to make smart decisions. Other logics are available. It's fresh content. It glamorizes journalism. It creates conflict, which can be engaging. But from a public information POV? No.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Jay Rosen

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!