#Armenia-#Azerbaijan ceasefire of 10/10 failed from the off. Stepanakert reported hit that night and 9 reported killed and dozens wounded in missile strikes on Ganja, AZ’s 2nd city; at least 2 civilians also reported killed during AZ operation in Hadrut, south NK, on 10/10. 1/11
These deaths affirm each side’s worst fears of the other: state-sanctioned terror and ethnic cleansing. Further radicalises societies and makes standing down more costly for leaders. 2/11
Humanitarian aspects of truce (prisoner x-change) not implemented, and intensive fighting reported resumed in NE and SE sectors of the front. Heavy bombardment of NK reported overnight, heavy fighting reported around Hadrut today. 3/11
Russian brokerage in crisis: 4-point doc affirmed existing Minsk Group structure and Basic Principles; suggests return to status quo ante, but faces a new situation: for first time AZ feels it has military advantage + external support from Turkey to press that advantage. 4/11
But sides still affirm the Minsk Group (which in wider format incl Turkey, Belarus, Italy, Germany, Sweden and Finland) and have not rejected the Basic Principles, incl, among other things, ARM withdrawals from territories around NK + interim status for NK + peacekeeping. 5/11
A lot of speculation, but not much verified data, out there on extent of shifts in territorial control. But fighting already reaching territory of NK proper (NKAO), and interim status (never accepted in NK) likely to be overtaken by ARM calls for remedial secession. 6/11
Key questions for the players at this point seem to me to be: For AZ, are territorial gains + strategic change sufficient to 1) have real leverage over any new negotiation; 2) survive any backlash once true extent of losses becomes public? 7/11
For ARM/NK, can an asymmetric fight be sustained long enough for 1) war fatigue/political costs; 2) Russian leverage; 3) winter to start acting on the AZ war effort? This and previous suggest that neither side has an incentive to de-escalate just now 8/11
For Russia, can Russian diplomacy retain credibility, and should Moscow work with Turkey or the Minsk Group to achieve this (ceasefire document suggests latter, but with US MIA, Russian leverage alone insufficient)? 9/11
For Europe, how can a humanitarian crisis on the edge of the continent be relieved and how to be relevant in a crisis on the edge of the continent beyond France’s Minsk Group co-Chair role (now criticised by AZ) 10/11
Interested in contrasting views and any ideas on what Turkey’s outlook currently is. 11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laurence Broers

Laurence Broers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LaurenceBroers

13 Oct
There are voices rightly highlighting relentless focus on geopolitics in the tragedy in + around #Karabakh. Geopolitics is what we can most easily see, and means to most easily simplify complexity + align it with political agendas. But it shouldn't be the main story now. 1/11
We only have intermittent or highly mediated glimpses of what is happening on ground, but clear that a humanitarian catastrophe is happening in NK, with main towns enduring massive destruction + half of the Armenian population – up to 70,000 people – fleeing the territory. 2/11
There have been atrocities reported in Hadrut, evoking comparable, never addressed, atrocities when 3 Armenians were killed in Talish in April 2016. Altogether around 25 civilians on the Armenian side have been reported killed. 3/11
Read 11 tweets
13 Oct
Monday’s ceasefire document refers to the Basic Principles (BP), under discussion within the Minsk Group. Conflict parties as of 12/10 still affirm Minsk Group negotiations; lot of BP mentions in social media over the last 48 hours, even as intense fighting continues 1/13
So what are the BP (also known as ‘Madrid Principles’), how do the sides see them and how relevant might they be after this new war? The BP is a list of bullet points setting out core principles for an ARM-AZ peace, on which a peace agreement could then be based. 2/13
They’ve been around formally since 2007, but many of the ideas longer. The BP have been through iterations since then, but original version was published by the Armenian Research Center ANI after the April 2016 “4-day war”: aniarc.am/2016/04/11/mad… 3/13
Read 13 tweets
10 Oct
After 2 weeks of war, Russia brokers a humanitarian ceasefire (CF) following 10 hours of talks between FMs Bayramov and Mnatsakanyan in Moscow. Sides agree: CF due to begin around now at 1200 local time, 10 October 2020.
Further aspects to the CF to be ‘additionally agreed’; parties to start substantive talks on the Basic Principles in Minsk Group framework and negotiation format to remain unchanged.
CF first good news in 2 weeks, but need to see if it will hold: reports of continued drone strikes + bombardment this morning; I found this useful on differences between CF, truce, cessation of hostilities, armistice: nytimes.com/2016/02/23/wor…
Read 15 tweets
4 Oct
Day 6, a brief summary: after very tentative signs of deceleration on Thurs/Friday, today saw a significant surge in fighting. All parties made statements or speeches indicating battles today seen as critical. ARM MoD says this is full-scale war, land + air + cyber. 1/7
Reported Armenian KIA stands at c. 206, ARM MoD has published details of 243 Azerbaijanis it claims KIA, but real figures for both likely much higher, especially after intense fighting in NE and SE of Line of Contact today; many hundreds more wounded. 2/7
Azerbaijan has said that 7/8 villages recaptured, incl. Madagiz in NE Karabakh and villages in SE in Fizuli-Jebrayil; there was a jubilant mood reported in Baku. Too early to confirm shifts in territorial control; certain though that aims much more ambitious than in 2016. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
3 Oct
How did #Armenia and #Azerbaijan get to this point? This thread brings together my short comments written April 2016-September 2020, mostly for @CHRussiaEurasia, but also @ips_journal, @OCMediaorg and @ValdaiClub. For a deeper background dive, see my book.
chathamhouse.org/expert/comment… The '4-day war' breaks out in April 2016.
chathamhouse.org/expert/comment… What needed to happen after April 2016 - and didn't.
Read 12 tweets
1 Oct
Day 5 of a new Armenian-Azerbaijani War: Where is Russia? I’m trying to figure out Russia’s role/strategy + set out some thoughts here; would be interested to hear other’s (constructive) thoughts on this (thread). 1/19
Russia quick to call for restraint 27/9; Lavrov talking to NP + IA, Putin talked to Macron 30/9, calls for ceasefire + offers mediation. But by day 5 in 2016 Russia had convened ARM + AZ military chiefs in Moscow + brokered ceasefire. In 2020 is Russia “hanging back”: why? 2/19
“Putin-as-strategist” school suggests hanging back is calculated: Moscow is allowing Azerbaijan + Turkey room for military action to undermine the Minsk Group, remind Armenia it needs Russia + indebt Erdogan, who benefits domestically if Azerbaijan takes back territories 3/19
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!