As a doctor who cares for #COVID19 patients the idea #HerdImmunity through infection is alarming. It's been rejected by the head of the NIH as "fringe," but is being embraced by the White House and @realDonaldTrump. Just what is herd immunity? 1/XX nytimes.com/live/2020/10/1…
Herd Immunity is an epidemiological phenomenon achieved when enough of a healthy population is immune through vaccination so that an infectious organism can no longer spread in a population. 2/XX
So what is enough of a population? For COVID19 most experts think around 70% of the population would need to be immune to achieve herd immunity. The range may be 40% to 90%, but it is likely somewhere in between. Currently 10-20% of the US has likely been infected. 3/XX
But with #COVID19, we currently have no FDA approved vaccine, therefore herd immunity would need to be achieved through infection with the virus. This could be a very deadly prospect with a virus with an infection fatality rate (IFR) 5-10x higher than seasonal flu (0.1%). 4/XX
First we must make a few assumptions:
Assumption #1- Infection=immunity. Currently this is unknown. We think this is likely, however there are reports of reinfection. 5/XX thelancet.com/journals/lanin…
Assumption #2- Immunity is lasting. Again, this is currently unknown. Serologic studies show a decay in neutralizing antibodies like the ones in convalescent plasma and the ones in the Regeneron monoclonal antibody cocktail that @realDonaldTrump. 6/XX nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Assumption #3- We can protect more vulnerable populations. COVID19 has a higher death rate for older and sicker people. Any policy of herd immunity would presuppose the ability to protect such populations. But @realDonaldTrump is 74 and obese, and he was infected. 7/XX
So if the above assumptions are accepted as true, and that COVID19 has an IFR of 0.5-1%, the question is: How many deaths would the US have to endure to achieve herd immunity? We cannot determine an absolute number, but the range is quite alarming. 8/XX
On the very low end, if 40% (or an additional 20%) would need to be infected, and 0.5% die, the simple math is: 330 million x 0.2=66 million x 0.005=330k. That is an additional 330,000 dead Americans to achieve herd immunity. 9/XX
On the high end, if 90% (or and additional 70%) need to be infected and 1% die, the math is: 330 million x 0.7=231 million x 0.01=2.31 million. That is an additional 2,310,000 dead Americans to achieve herd immunity. 10/XX
At the very low end, is 330,000 more dead Americans acceptable? What about over 2 million? With hospitals stretched beyond capacity, how many more will die from non-COVID related illness? How many nurses will die? How will our society survive such tragedy? 11/XX
So when you hear @realDonaldTrump, or @SWAtlasHoover mention a policy of #HerdImmunity to get through this crisis, consider the cost in human pain and suffering, and please just #WearAMask and socially distance, and we can get through this together. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As a doctor, it's beyond bizarre to see a potential #SCOTUS justice say she'll make decisions about healthcare (eg, denying it to millions) based on #Originalism-what she thinks people in the 1700s would have intended. How different was medicine back then? Read on... (1/11)
In the 18th century, barber-surgeons were still doing blood letting, a common (deadly) practice that gave rise to the barber pole with red & white stripes representing bandages & blood. It'd be 11 yrs before surgeons would separate from barbers & perform medical procedures (2/11)
The 1st vaccine wasn't developed until 1799 (smallpox). Does Judge Barrett support #Medicaid covering the routine immunization of kids against deadly diseases? Would she oppose @realDonaldTrump providing a coronavirus vaccine to us, even tho the founders would be confused? (3/11)
As an ER doc who admitted many new #COVID19 patients on my shift yesterday, the idea that @realdonaldtrump left the hospital early is disturbing & alarming. He's not only putting himself in serious harm, he could kill many others. Here's how: (1/5)
The president wants his fans to think the virus is no big deal. Well, 1 out of 10 COVID patients in his age range die of it. If people his age listen to him & don't take it seriously, that's a huge number who will get the virus. And a huge chunk of them will die of it. (2/5)
Keep in mind, the president's case was severe enough that he was treated with some very serious therapies. His oxygen levels sank to alarming levels. His fever shot up. There's a chance he's setting his own recovery back. At minimum, he's modeling very dangerous behavior. (3/5)
I know we're all now immune to reports of the White House mishandling Americans' health - but this story👇 about them meddling with @CDCgov to alter their weekly reports is an OUTRAGE & will make the job of doctors like me much harder. Here's why... (1/12) washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
Everyday in my practice as an emergency physician I rely upon updated studies of various tests & therapies, so that I can best serve my patients. It's called evidence-based medicine & it means relying on rigorous data. Stated simply, patients depend upon it to stay alive. (2/12)
A political aide reportedly applied pressure to tamper with something called the MMWR (Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report), a digest in epidemiology. This journal has been a critical piece of communication about emerging & established diseases in the U.S. for 90 yrs. (3/12)
As a doctor, I fear this isn't getting enough attention: New presidential advisor Scott Atlas backs a very dangerous plan to have us all get #COVID19 so we achieve "herd immunity."👇 This could *kill* hundreds of thousands of Americans. Here's how: (1/11)
First off, who is this Scott Atlas that now advises the president on #COVID19, instead of people like Dr. Fauci? He's a right-wing think tank guy who hasn't treated patients in years. Or as doctor @kenjeong artifully puts it: (2/11)
Now to Atlas's dangerous idea for #COVID19: "Herd immunity" occurs when enough people have immunity to a disease so the infectious agent can't find a new host & it eventually dies out. A minimum of 43% (some say 70%) of Americans would need to be infected to achieve this. (3/11)
As a doctor, I yearn for us to have effective therapies for #COVID19. However, @realdonaldtrump's rushed "Emergency Use Authorization" for convalescent plasma (an unproven treatment) may actually *harm* our ability to fight the virus. That's right - harm it. Here's why: (1/12)
When someone recovers from #COVID19, their blood will have antibodies that may help others currently infected. By transferring these antibodies via plasma, immunity could (in theory) be passed to the patient to speed recovery & save lives. But we must *study* this theory. (2/12)
Before the president's "Emergency Use Authorization," patients could get this plasma in studies & through an FDA program that made the treatment available to patients if a study was not available. Over 70,000 patients received it & data was collected from each of them. (3/12)
As a doctor, I'm deeply concerned that the White House's sabotage of USPS may literally cost many Americans their lives. Let me repeat that: The administration's plan to slow down the mail could cause folks to die, if they don't get their medications on time. Here's how: (1/9)
Over a million Americans have insulin-dependent diabetes in this country. What if the mail causes their insulin to be delayed? A few days without insulin can result in Diabetic Ketoacidosis - or *potentially deadly* high blood sugar. All thanks to politics. (2/9)
Nearly half of people over 50 have high blood pressure. If your medication for chronic hypertension comes a week late, it could cause a critical increase in blood pressure, and lead to a stroke. All thanks to politics. (3/9)