As a doctor, it's beyond bizarre to see a potential #SCOTUS justice say she'll make decisions about healthcare (eg, denying it to millions) based on #Originalism-what she thinks people in the 1700s would have intended. How different was medicine back then? Read on... (1/11)
In the 18th century, barber-surgeons were still doing blood letting, a common (deadly) practice that gave rise to the barber pole with red & white stripes representing bandages & blood. It'd be 11 yrs before surgeons would separate from barbers & perform medical procedures (2/11)
The 1st vaccine wasn't developed until 1799 (smallpox). Does Judge Barrett support #Medicaid covering the routine immunization of kids against deadly diseases? Would she oppose @realDonaldTrump providing a coronavirus vaccine to us, even tho the founders would be confused? (3/11)
In 1846 was the first demonstration of anesthesia in the world. Should #Medicare pay for anesthesia for hip replacements or heart bypass? Or should we just give Medicare recipients a shot of whiskey and a bullet on which to bite? (4/11)
Speaking of surgery, the first appendectomy was in 1886. Should we let them rupture and hope for the best? That’s what happened to my patient when her mom didn’t bring her in for belly pain for a week because she didn’t have insurance. But hey, it's what the Founders knew! (5/11)
EKGs & X-rays weren’t used until 1895. To Judge Barrett, would my evaluations of #Medicare patients with chest pain or dyspnea be unconstitutional, as these critical diagnostic modalities wouldn't be discovered until nearly a century after the US Constitution was ratified? (6/11)
In 1906 was the first human blood transfusion using the ABO typing technique. Are these measures to save the lives of soldiers on the battlefield (with transfusions paid for by US government-funded healthcare) OK in an “originalist” version of healthcare? (7/11)
Penicillin, the 1st true antibiotic, wasn't discovered until 1928. Anyone on Medicare, Medicaid, TriCare or in the VA should beware if they get a simple bacterial infection in 2021. The founders didn't say your treatment should be covered. And "originalists" might listen! (8/11)
And the list goes on and on. Nearly every aspect of modern medicine was non-existent in the late 18th century. An “originalist” approach to the government funding of any type of healthcare today might deem all of them unconstitutional. (9/11)
This is personal for me. Eliminating the #ACA will rip health insurance away from 25 million Americans, including over 8,000 people in my poor rural Michigan county of 48,000 (which supported Trump with over 2/3 of the vote). Is Obamacare just the first step? (10/11)
"Originalist" health care-No more X-Rays, EKGs, or antibiotics. You can dump your PCP, and make an appointment to see your barber for your annual bloodletting. It won’t keep you healthy or cure what ails you.

But at least you won’t go bankrupt from the care you receive. (/END)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Rob Davidson #WearAMask

Dr. Rob Davidson #WearAMask Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrRobDavidson

14 Oct
As a doctor who cares for #COVID19 patients the idea #HerdImmunity through infection is alarming. It's been rejected by the head of the NIH as "fringe," but is being embraced by the White House and @realDonaldTrump. Just what is herd immunity? 1/XX nytimes.com/live/2020/10/1…
Herd Immunity is an epidemiological phenomenon achieved when enough of a healthy population is immune through vaccination so that an infectious organism can no longer spread in a population. 2/XX Image
So what is enough of a population? For COVID19 most experts think around 70% of the population would need to be immune to achieve herd immunity. The range may be 40% to 90%, but it is likely somewhere in between. Currently 10-20% of the US has likely been infected. 3/XX
Read 12 tweets
6 Oct
As an ER doc who admitted many new #COVID19 patients on my shift yesterday, the idea that @realdonaldtrump left the hospital early is disturbing & alarming. He's not only putting himself in serious harm, he could kill many others. Here's how: (1/5)
The president wants his fans to think the virus is no big deal. Well, 1 out of 10 COVID patients in his age range die of it. If people his age listen to him & don't take it seriously, that's a huge number who will get the virus. And a huge chunk of them will die of it. (2/5)
Keep in mind, the president's case was severe enough that he was treated with some very serious therapies. His oxygen levels sank to alarming levels. His fever shot up. There's a chance he's setting his own recovery back. At minimum, he's modeling very dangerous behavior. (3/5)
Read 5 tweets
15 Sep
I know we're all now immune to reports of the White House mishandling Americans' health - but this story👇 about them meddling with @CDCgov to alter their weekly reports is an OUTRAGE & will make the job of doctors like me much harder. Here's why... (1/12) washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
Everyday in my practice as an emergency physician I rely upon updated studies of various tests & therapies, so that I can best serve my patients. It's called evidence-based medicine & it means relying on rigorous data. Stated simply, patients depend upon it to stay alive. (2/12)
A political aide reportedly applied pressure to tamper with something called the MMWR (Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report), a digest in epidemiology. This journal has been a critical piece of communication about emerging & established diseases in the U.S. for 90 yrs. (3/12)
Read 12 tweets
1 Sep
As a doctor, I fear this isn't getting enough attention: New presidential advisor Scott Atlas backs a very dangerous plan to have us all get #COVID19 so we achieve "herd immunity."👇 This could *kill* hundreds of thousands of Americans. Here's how: (1/11)
First off, who is this Scott Atlas that now advises the president on #COVID19, instead of people like Dr. Fauci? He's a right-wing think tank guy who hasn't treated patients in years. Or as doctor @kenjeong artifully puts it: (2/11)
Now to Atlas's dangerous idea for #COVID19: "Herd immunity" occurs when enough people have immunity to a disease so the infectious agent can't find a new host & it eventually dies out. A minimum of 43% (some say 70%) of Americans would need to be infected to achieve this. (3/11)
Read 11 tweets
25 Aug
As a doctor, I yearn for us to have effective therapies for #COVID19. However, @realdonaldtrump's rushed "Emergency Use Authorization" for convalescent plasma (an unproven treatment) may actually *harm* our ability to fight the virus. That's right - harm it. Here's why: (1/12)
When someone recovers from #COVID19, their blood will have antibodies that may help others currently infected. By transferring these antibodies via plasma, immunity could (in theory) be passed to the patient to speed recovery & save lives. But we must *study* this theory. (2/12)
Before the president's "Emergency Use Authorization," patients could get this plasma in studies & through an FDA program that made the treatment available to patients if a study was not available. Over 70,000 patients received it & data was collected from each of them. (3/12)
Read 12 tweets
15 Aug
As a doctor, I'm deeply concerned that the White House's sabotage of USPS may literally cost many Americans their lives. Let me repeat that: The administration's plan to slow down the mail could cause folks to die, if they don't get their medications on time. Here's how: (1/9)
Over a million Americans have insulin-dependent diabetes in this country. What if the mail causes their insulin to be delayed? A few days without insulin can result in Diabetic Ketoacidosis - or *potentially deadly* high blood sugar. All thanks to politics. (2/9)
Nearly half of people over 50 have high blood pressure. If your medication for chronic hypertension comes a week late, it could cause a critical increase in blood pressure, and lead to a stroke. All thanks to politics. (3/9)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!