❗WHAT MAKES PERCENT POSITIVITY SUCH A CRITICAL METRIC IN A PANDEMIC?❓

(1/36) Plus: thoughts on #COVID19 response thresholds in #Ontario and why #Europe is a crystal ball for #Canada... Mega-thread below. 👇🧵🚨
(2/36) While it may be the daily case numbers that grab the headlines, it’s far from the most important metric to watch when determining the trajectory of COVID-19, as I’ve written before.

(3/36) Instead, we should be focusing on other metrics, like the 7-day rolling average, the number of outbreaks in long-term care facilities and percent positivity.
(4/36) What makes percent positivity in particular such a useful metric is that it summarizes two distinct signals in a single number.
(5/36) The definition of percent positivity is simple: the number of positive tests (numerator) divided by the total number of test results reported (denominator), expressed as a percentage.
(6/36) Assuming the underlying population being tested remains constant, there are two ways for percent positivity to increase: if positive tests increase (numerator) or total tests decrease (denominator).
(7/36) Thus, a rising positivity rate signals either a growing outbreak or insufficient testing (or more likely, both). Since insufficient testing directly impacts our ability to isolate cases, identify contacts and break chains of transmission, both situations should raise 🚨.
(8/36) Put another way, we should expect percent positivity to remain constant over time if and only if:

1. The fraction of new cases detected and reported is constant.
2. The number of tests scales with the true number of new cases.

medrxiv.org/content/10.110… Image
(9/36) But what if our original assumption is wrong? What if the underlying population being tested does change over time? Let’s look at three recent examples of this from the Canadian province of Ontario.

(10/36) The first is the switch from walk-in testing to appointment-based testing at the beginning of October.

globalnews.ca/news/7380500/o…
(11/36) The populations getting tested under these two regimes are almost certainly different. However, it is difficult to predict the effect on percent positivity, only that comparing before and after is somewhat apples to oranges.
(12/36) The second is the suspension of contact tracing in Toronto.

toronto.ctvnews.ca/toronto-public…
(13/36) This leads to a smaller fraction of cases being detected (particularly asymptomatic cases), but it also means fewer people without symptoms will be prompted to get tested. So again, it’s hard to predict the effect of this change on percent positivity.
(14/36) The final change is the tightening of testing criteria in response to a massive testing bottleneck to discourage low-risk asymptomatic individuals from seeking tests.

toronto.com/news-story/102…
(15/36) This move likely raised percent positivity—which is actually a good thing. Given a fixed testing capacity, your testing strategy should aim to maximize percent positivity, because this means you are capturing the highest possible fraction of cases.
(16/36) We can illustrate this principle with an extreme example. Suppose you have the capacity to run 100 tests per day. Normally, you would choose who to test based on symptoms and/or exposure history.
(17/36) If you instead tested people at random, you would end up with a lower percent positivity. A higher percent positivity means you are capturing a higher fraction of cases with your limited testing capacity.
(18/36) This is why the interpretation of changes in percent positivity over time is only straightforward if the underlying population being tested remains roughly the same.
(19/36) Why is percent positivity front of mind for me right now? In early November, the Ontario government unveiled a five category, colour-coded COVID-19 response framework based on a series of metrics.

ontario.ca/page/covid-19-… Image
(20/36) While the idea of a transparent, predictable response framework based on sensible metrics is a good one, I along with many other experts expressed surprise at the thresholds used in the response framework, as well as the accompanying responses.

thestar.com/politics/provi…
(21/36) One of the most shocking elements was the 10% positivity threshold for the red “control” category.
(22/36) A 10% positivity rate indicates an out-of-control epidemic or woefully inadequate testing (or both), especially during cold/flu season when the demand for testing will increase due to respiratory symptoms from non-COVID respiratory tract infections.
(23/36) When you reach 10% positivity, it’s far too late to act to prevent serious consequences.
(24/36) There’s no reason to wait to see if this theory bears out in Ontario. Here in Canada, heading deeper into autumn and winter, we have a crystal ball to see the future if we don’t act quickly and decisively to keep positivity rates dramatically below 10%.
(25/36) That crystal ball is Europe (and many parts of the United States), which for this second wave of the pandemic have been several weeks ahead of us in terms of trajectory.

economist.com/briefing/2020/…
(26/36) The threat of total health system collapse has sent several countries into severe lockdowns, and restrictions are mounting across many regions of the United States.

nytimes.com/live/2020/11/1…
(27/36) @ASPphysician breaks down the cautionary tale of Belgium admirably in the below Twitter thread.👇🧵

(28/36) There’s no reason to expect things work differently here. Every province and every city in Canada is still vulnerable to COVID-19. There is perhaps no better illustration of this than the province of Manitoba.
(29/36) Up until early October, the province was relatively lightly hit by the virus. After this point, cases started exploding in Winnipeg and across the province.
(30/36) As of mid-November, Manitoba has by far the highest rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations per capita in the country.
(31/36) According to Doctors Manitoba, Winnipeg’s test positivity first hit 10% on November 10, although it had previously hit 9.7% as early as October 30.
(32/36) Let’s see where these dates fall on the case and hospitalization curves. Are these really the points where we should decide to take corrective action? (Note: Cases are for Winnipeg, hosp. are for the whole province because I couldn’t find data for just Winnipeg) Image
(33/36) You do not wait until 10% positivity to act—you are almost certainly very deep into uncontrolled, exponential growth at this point.
(34/36) For the record, Winnipeg moved into shutdown on November 2, followed by the rest of the province on November 12, the day province as a whole hit an 11% positivity rate.

news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.htm…
(35/36) Thankfully for Ontario, it didn’t take long for the government to backtrack on the response framework and release revised thresholds, with the red “control” threshold set at a much more reasonable 2.5%.

thestar.com/politics/provi…
(36/36) It is, at the very least, a step in the right direction. How about the rest of the thresholds in the revised framework? Well…that’s another question for another thread.🧵 Image
I should mention you can read this post as a blog! These threads/blog posts are going to become a more regular thing, but I’m still figuring out the schedule.

jeanpaulsoucy.com/post/percent-p…
That’s it for today. You can find more from me and my team, the COVID-19 Canada Open Data Working Group, at our website:

opencovid.ca
I also provide a daily, automated backup of over 100 government COVID-19 data files, including data on schools and other settings of exposure.🏫

github.com/jeanpaulrsoucy…
If you've made it to the end: thank you and congratulations! Here's a cat bursting out of a snowbank. Have a great afternoon!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jean-Paul R. Soucy

Jean-Paul R. Soucy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JPSoucy

16 Nov
Some #COVID19 #Canada trends (% change in 7-day avg. vs. 1 week ago): (1/5)

AB: +78.1% 📈 (599.1/day ➡️ 1,067.3/day)
SK: +62.6% 📈 (97.0/day ➡️ 157.7/day)
MB: +34.4% 📈 (299.4/day ➡️ 402.4/day)
ON: +32.1% 📈 (1,096.6/day ➡️ 1,448.6/day)
QC: +15.2% 📈 (1,119.9/day ➡️ 1,290.6/day)
Both #Alberta and #BritishColumbia have had some reporting difficulties of late. I’ve omitted the BC trend in anticipation of tomorrow’s post-weekend report. (2/5)
Some current and emerging hotspots: (3/5)

Far North (SK): +274.4% 📈 (5.6/day ➡️ 20.9/day)
Windsor-Essex (ON): +101.2% 📈 (11.6/day ➡️ 23.3/day)
Waterloo (ON): +98.9% 📈 (25.4/day ➡️ 50.6/day)
Saskatoon (SK): +64.2% 📈 (32.3/day ➡️ 53.0/day)
Read 7 tweets
21 Oct
❗ONTARIO, STOP REACTING TO THE DAILY COVID CASE COUNTS❗

(1/48) Why daily #COVID19 case counts are not the most relevant number and what #Ontario should be paying attention to instead. Mega-thread below. 👇🧵🚨
(2/48) Let’s begin by recapping what daily reported case counts are supposed to represent. When we look at them, we get a picture of what the epidemic looked like 1–2 weeks ago, so any change in the trajectory of the epidemic will take some time to show up in the daily counts.
(3/48) Why? Because it takes ~5 days from time of infection to begin showing symptoms, and then further days to seek testing, get tested, and finally process the test and report the results. This lag is affected by a number of factors, such as the size of the testing backlog.
Read 48 tweets
21 Oct
Watching Dr. Fauci speak at @GairdnerAwards Global Perspectives Panel. "Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases: From AIDS to COVID-19"
Map of emerging infectious diseases. When Dr. Fauci started, this map had one dot: HIV in Africa.
In 2015, Dr. Fauci's number one concern was a novel respiratory pathogen.
Read 8 tweets
10 Oct
🚨 #Ontario made the call today to re-implement modified stage 2 restrictions in #Ottawa, #Toronto, and #Peel due to the resurgence in #COVID19 cases and hospitalizations. 📈

(1/20) Some thoughts on where COVID-19 is going in the province. Thread.🧵⬇️
(2/20) This should not be a surprise to anyone. It has been apparent that COVID-19 is once again on an exponential trajectory in Ontario for at least several weeks.

(3/20) A confluence of recent events—the testing backlog, the transition to appointment-based testing, the suspension of contact tracing—have made daily case numbers in the province less reliable, especially in hard-hit areas like Toronto.

Read 20 tweets
29 Sep
❗❗UPDATE on #COVID19 in #Canada for September 29.❗❗

(1/42) What it means and what you can do. Mega-thread below.🧵 🚨 Image
(2/42) We are now well into the second wave of COVID-19 in Canada. 🌊

Geographically, recent cases have been concentrated in Canada’s four largest provinces, particularly in and around #Montreal and the #GTA. But cases have been growing at an alarming rate across the country. ImageImage
(3/42) % change in 7-day rolling average of cases compared to one week ago:
MB: +95.6% 📈 (22.7/day ➡️ 44.4/day)
QC: +57.8% 📈 (409.4/day ➡️ 646.1/day)
ON: +37.2% 📈 (357.6/day ➡️ 490.7/day)
Read 43 tweets
24 Sep
What does the #COVID19 resurgence in #Montreal look like? Heavily concentrated in the city's central and eastern neighbourhoods. A visual aid for @Aaron_Derfel's excellent analysis.👇

⬅️ Weekly cases per 100k by neighbourhood
➡️ Daily cases for all of Montreal

Showing data for full weeks only: 2020-08-31 to 2020-09-20.

Data from @santemontreal.

santemontreal.qc.ca/population/cor…
Archived daily snapshots of Montreal cases by neighbourhood here.👇

github.com/jeanpaulrsoucy…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!