Right. What a week in #Brexit. First talk of Barnier pulling the plug; and today a big flap over fish. So where are we as M. Barnier boards the Eurostar for London? Well, you guessed it - still stuck on the fundamentals. Why? Well, here's what I know. 1/Thread
First, the talk that @MichelBarnier was issuing ultimatums - that spoke to real frustration on EU side. Things are getting spicy, but missed the fact that the EU will never walk away. They just don't. As he reassured EU ambassadors today /2
@MichelBarnier No, and @DavidGHFrost has said the same. So if this negotiation fails, it will be because it just bleeds out on the table, right before our eyes,, and both sides simply overestimate the political will of the other to save the patient. Each will have their own blame narrative /3
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost So where are the talks on the substance? Is it 'just about the fish' or is the 'level playing field' issue dragging the whole thing down?
Most fundamentally it's about the rules for free and fair competition, I think, when all the noises subsides. /4
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost And as my inestimable colleague @jimbrunsden
says, the prognosis - from an EU perspective at least - at the moment seems "downbeat, sobering and bleak". Why?
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden Well it goes back to this fundamentally different conception of what both sides are trying to achieve - through which lens or filter you view the idea of this 'level playing field' that the EU has been saying is a precondition of zero-tariff, zero-quota access to its market /6
While the EU sees them as the foundation of free and fair competition and a stable relationship, over time. /7
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden So depending who's specs you're wearing, the so called 'ratchet clause' that keeps the EU and UK trading on a moving baseline of standards is EITHER a bar that turns a slowly tightening regulatory throttle OR the key that opens the door to a fruitful relationship. /8
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden That's why we're stuck, and why this week talk turned to a 'review' or 'sunset' clause that might create space for both sides to walk away for now with their mutually exclusive conceptions of the deal in tact - but that itself quickly becomes a proxy for the same row. /9
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden The UK suggests a 4-year 'sunset' clause where, if they've failed to live up to their (non-binding) commitments on LPF they accept the EU can impose tariffs. That might create a kind of backstop to the 'trust us' argument (which the EU doesn't after UKIM)/10
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden But that will never fly in EU thinking, because Mr Barnier can well see that that is just another UK ruse to 'escape' - to pay a fixed tariff for divergence, over time. Well, the price is too low, if the UK keeps all the other elements of market access in an FTA /11
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden There might be more legs in something more "nuclear" - where the UK can walk away after four years, or however long, but only at the price of another 'no deal'. But then if you're the UK, that feels like more handcuffs. Round and round we go. #Brexit always gets so damn binary/12
The UK, by running down the clock, thinks the EU will ultimately accept there is a limit how much of a control-freak it can be. It will fudge a deal as it always does/13
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden The EU bets that @BorisJohnson will look at those OBR forecasts and come to his senses and pay the price required for access to the market of 460m people with which the UK does nearly 50 per cent of its trade /14
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson Which takes us one step back to the 'original sin' of this negotiation, which is that it is based on a UK vision of 'sovereignty' and 'freedom' that doesn't really exist. The EU is - like it or not - going to exert that gravitational pull on the UK. It's just an economic fact /15
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson The government is about to turn the clock back to 1992; swaddle businesses in an extra 200m custom declarations; create a parallel regulatory frame work for chemicals and manufacturers for no obviously good reason - or at least no reason they've bothered to articulate /16
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson It remains clearly in both sides interests to do a deal - really it does - but it's hard to get there if your conception of your own side's offensive economic interests (your farming and pharma industry, chemicals and cars) is so warped.
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson It is one of the truly remarkable things about Brexit, that such a wrenching change to the UK’s trading arrangements with its nearest neighbours should have taken place with so little cognisance of — or consultation with — those that do the trading. /18
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson But we are where we are. There can still be a 'deal'; the pressure will start to tell on both sides, but given the philosophical divide outlined above, it seems to me that, at best, it will be a grinding, unstable equilibrium - or disequilibrium, more accurately. /19
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson Whatever the outcome over the next few weeks, it is bad luck for business — and consumers, workers, travellers and everyone else that will be caught in the fallout — that it has apparently been impossible to organise an EU exit in an orderly fashion.
Good weekend all. ENDS
@MichelBarnier@DavidGHFrost@jimbrunsden@BorisJohnson PS...if we get a deal, when do we get a deal? Dunno. UK always consistently more optimistic than EU, which if you're cynical is part of the 'nothing to see here' approach on LPF. I reckon as @Mij_Europe says, fair chance it goes late into December
This. “The problem is fish” is a U.K. ‘line to take’ being briefed relentlessly to underplay the LPF issue as not worth falling out over - and make EU look unreasonable for not moving (if they don’t) as we enter engame. For the EU “the problem is LPF”, even if fish is also hard.
This is not to say that fishing is easy or politically unimportant (the 6-12 mile zone where boats are too small to be compensated has been a key area of contention for French and Belgians)...but one internal EU estimate showed = 150 Belgian boats catching €5m of fish a year!/3
So. All the top #Brexit mandarins were out today answering Qs from @CommonsPAC and they were confident on Jan 1 borders, including predicting a "fourfold increase in capacity" for customs next year - per Alex Chisolm of Cab Office. Is that right? /1
@CommonsPAC It would, on the face of it, appear to run contrary from a lot of the predictions from @RHARichardB@LogisticsUKNews and other trade groups about a shortage of customs intermediaries. The figure of needing 50,000 more has been around for a while - but not recognised by govt./2
To be clear, that's not same as saying 4x number of agents, but a 4x increase in "capacity" - so more computerisation, outsourcing etc - as Jim Harra of HMRC explained. /3
So this week I went to Ashford International Truckstop to see how @transportgovuk was getting on readying truckers for the end of #Brexit transition in six weeks time....so what did I find? Mixed news. /1
@transportgovuk Well, the frontline of frontline of the battle to get Britain ready for its post-Brexit borders runs through a 20ft portable cabin outside the caf/shop area...perfect for snagging passing truckers /2
@transportgovuk Only one problem - none of them speak any English. I mean hardly a word. Most are Czech, Romanian, Hungarian, Polish....my French and Spanish no use at all.
So the contractors trying to press information into their hands used ipads +google translate/3
🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚚🚚🚗🚗🇬🇧🇪🇺🚨🚨West Midlands’ Tory mayor warns over post-Brexit car tariffs via @FT me with @AndyBounds
...you might think all a bit late in the #brexit game /1 on.ft.com/3pzPuRe
@FT@AndyBounds Business leaders raised the issue in the weekly Economic Impact Group meeting, chaired by Mayor Andy Street...it relates to the fact that after #Brexit carmakers that use non-EU parts will face tariffs EVEN IF we get a 'zero tariff' deal.../2
@FT@AndyBounds As he put it: "the [European] Commission has made clear that it will not agree third country cumulation in any circumstances, which we regret, but obviously cannot insist upon" /3
NEW: 🚨🚨🚚🚚🛳⚓️🚢🚨🚨
As Global Britain prepares to set sail, @IHSMarkit port performance data shows @felixstowe_port - the ”Port of Britain” - at the bottom of the efficiency stakes. This is port that takes 40% U.K. containers /1 on.ft.com/3lyVFlP
The congestion is so bad that George Griffiths of @plattsshipping tells me, companies are piling on surcharges - $500-$800 a 40ft box. /2
@plattsshipping This has been a long-running saga - @ft reported in October of calls for the government to intervene as trade groups like @BIFA said their members where being bit by so many delays. @BIFA_DG Robert keen is still suprised govt not doing more /3
Worth reading Charles Moore - one former @BorisJohnson boss who is still loyal to him, but without being unaware of his failings. Full of personal and political insights...starting with why he needed #cummings to counteracted the prevarication... 1/
..for which “two columns” Johnson is famous and which - if one set of briefings today are correct - ultimately drove Cumming’s and co to distraction/despair. But on that, Moore says, Johnson often uses ambiguity as a shield. /2
Moore had always been alive to Johnson failings, in one piece about a Boris Brexit essay dismissing the “Borisian tosh” - but always aware of his powers to persuade and carry the #brexit charabanc forward. Now he sees others losing faith.../3