#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by a 42 year old spiritual practitioner challenging Kerala High Court order where habeas corpus plea seeking release of his spiritual live in partner from her parent's forceful custody was denied. Plea states HC order contrary to #HadiyaCase
Senior Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan: Please refer to the HC judgment. It's stated that the HC recalled interaction with the girl where she denied a divine relationship with the spiritual guru
CJI:can permit you to approach HC and seek intervention. Without that we cant do anything
CJI: I think there is a communication gap between us. Mental illness is one thing and illegal detention of the woman. She is in custody of parents. Custody is different than illegal detention
Sankaranarayanan:Custody becomes illegal when an adult says she is in illegal detention
Sankaranarayanan: Please look at the Mental health act. They take custody to be legal only because she is mentally ill?
Sankaranarayanan: Adult can never be in the custody of another adult. There is no such law. Custody of parents is based on total fact that she is mentally ill. She is a gold medallist. Experts can arrive at such a conclusion, courts cannot arrive at such a conclusion
CJI: Was she stopped to go to college?
Sankaranarayanan: Why are antecedents of the petitioner being looked into
CJI: we will dismiss it with reasons and will let you know the reason. Where is the finding of illegal detention
Sankaranarayanan: Maybe I am not making myself clear
CJI: not at all
Sankaranarayanan: When an adult person says they are in illegal detention then they have to be released
CJI: No the court can enquire with it if the judge does not agree with it.
CJI: We will not go into question of facts
Sankaranarayanan: This looks like an issue of semantics. Allow me to withdraw and approach HC for a finding on illegal detention
CJI: don't tell us what is semantics and what is not semantics. We know what we are saying
CJI: It is obvious that finding of illegal detention is sine qua non for maintainability of habeas Corpus plea. Petitioner allowed to approach HC for a finding on this aspect.
Delhi High Court to start hearing @amazon's plea seeking enforcement of Emergency Award restraining Future Group from going ahead with its deal with Reliance Retail.
Senior Advocate Gopal Subramanium appears for @amazon.
He will make rejoinder submissions today.
I'll be making a statement at the end of the hearing. There's a time zone gap: Subramanium on the Court's suggestion to parties to resolve the dispute.
Delhi High Court begins hearing PIL seeking immediate release of all persons illegally arrested and detained on/after January 26 from areas in and around Singhu, Tikri and Ghazipur borders.
#BombayHighCourt will continue hearing the bail application moved by Partho Dasgupta former BARC CEO today in connection to his arrest in the #TRPScam case.
Supreme Court bench of Justices Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna to resume hearing issues related to objection to the e-voting process for winding up Franklin Templeton's six mutual fund schemes and distribution of money to the unitholders. #SupremeCourt #FranklinTempleton
Justice Sanjiv Khanna: Section 41(1) states that while winding up either AMC will look into it or third party. Other issues of explanatory memorandum etc it has already been made
Advocate Nithyaesh Natraj: The threshold of Section 39 will apply
Justice Khanna: We are only on the voting process
Adv Natraj: You had asked whether we want our money back. Ofcourse we want it back. But the question is how. The open ended scheme ensures me demanding the money on my whims and fancy.