Did the UCP ask Albertans if they wanted their post-secondary education institutions (PSEIs), built up over decades with public funding, to be privatized? I, for one, don't remember that being on Jason Kenney's list of campaign promises. 1/n #abpse #abpoli
What does privatization mean? Well, at what point does a university education cease to be a public good and become a commodified private service? 2/n
When students pay for more than half the costs of their education individually, through tuition fees? When 70% of university budgets come from tuition fees and "entrepreneurial" endeavours (things one can charge money for)? 3/n
PSEIs have already fallen a long way from being "mostly public" (publicly funded) to being marginally public institutions. Yet where is the logic in this? 4/n
Why do we have a public consensus that education should be public from K to 12, but not for young adults? Why do we make post-secondary education contingent on individual ability to pay? 5/n
This isn't the pre-industrial era, when people were supposed to marry by age 18 and considered old by age 40. Education isn't a luxury to which only the sons of the wealthy are entitled. At least, it shouldn't be. 6/n
It is profoundly elitist for the UCP to privatize post-secondary education, making it less and less accessible to citizens of average means. That's what they are doing, by cutting public funding of PSEIs. 7/n
It's parallel to privatizing health care. You can have a fully public health care system, or one in which some services & treatments are publicly funded and others are not. Bit by bit, govts like the UCP try to pare the public system down to its bones. 8/n
In the end, only the people who can pay for them get the full range of health services and treatments available. In the end, only those who can pay for it get a post-secondary education. 8/n
Why would we want to go in this direction when we don't have to? When post-secondary education could be more efficiently and fairly provided as a universal public good--like health care? 9/n
When we are at a historical moment that calls for the reinvention of economies and energy systems? When young people need higher education to meet these challenges? 10/n
And so, I ask again, did the UCP ask Albertans if we wanted our PSEIs to be privatized? To be crippled by demands to generate revenue when this is not what they were intended to do? 11/n
Universities, colleges, and polytechnic institutes are schools. Academics study and do research; they share their knowledge through teaching and publishing. Those are their jobs. Socially valuable jobs. 12/n
We don't ask high schools to generate revenue by selling products. Why would we ask universities to do so? We are not businesses; we are public services. The value we produce is everywhere, in the forms of education and knowledge. 13/n
Just like the value produced by health care providers is everywhere, in the forms of health and well-being. Sadly, some politicians don't believe that education or health care are public goods, to which all citizens should have equal access. 14/n
And so we have to defend these public goods again, and again, and again. I say, post-secondary education should be free for all who meet the academic requirements. PSEIs should have stable, predictable funding that is adequate for the demands we make of them. 15/n
PSEIs must be accountable to citizens both in the sense of accounting for how they allocate their funding, and in the sense of responding to society's changing needs and the needs of their communities. 16/n
But trying to make PSEIs function like private sector businesses--like the UCP wants to do--belies a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of education and scholarship as public goods in and of themselves. 17/n
The UCP's agenda is destructive of the quality of education, antithetical to independent thought and scientific endeavour, and corrosive of a pillar of democracy--informed citizens who can engage in public life. 18/n
I, for one, do not believe that Albertans want to see their post-secondary institutions degraded by privatization. Nor do they want life chances placed beyond the reach of their children, due to escalating tuition fees and debt. 19/n
And I can assure Albertans that professors feel just as passionately about protecting and multiplying opportunities for all our children--about helping them make a better world. We chose to work in the public sector because we believe in the value of what we do. 20/n
A university is not a business and should never become a business--any more than a hospital should be a business whose primary objective is to generate revenue. This would be a betrayal of the public interest. 21/n
The UCP govt does not understand why such boundaries between private interests and public interests have been put in place by societies, over time. It's time for Albertans to remind them. 22/22 #StopPSEcuts

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laurie Adkin

Laurie Adkin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LaurieAdkin

26 Feb
"Governments [sic] role is to provide a business environment that encourages the entrepreneurial spirit of its people." - Finance Minister Travis Toews in the Feb 25 2021 budget address
alberta.ca/release.cfm?xI…
And the UCP's supply side economics, that promise to reduce deficits, increase GDP growth, and increase employment, have done precisely the opposite. As they always do. 2/n
"Economic recovery" is always imminent for these guys--always "next year." They pretend to control and predict the future. The sure thing they actually deliver is the transfer of public wealth to private shareholders & CEOs. 3/n
Read 6 tweets
26 Feb
#UCP govt says "over the next 3 years, we will spend $1.5 billion to develop key sectors and diversify the economy." They blew that much on one bad investment.
We'd have had $4.5 billion to spend on job creation if they hadn't given big corporations a tax holiday.
With a normal fiscal policy--not even an ambition plan for public finance--we wouldn't be losing hundreds of jobs in the public sector.
Read 4 tweets
17 Jan
Benga/Riversdale says: "The company has developed wildlife and fish monitoring programs to sustain those populations, and also has a plan in place to safely and effectively manage selenium." 1/n
calgaryherald.com/news/no-free-f…
@ABWilderness @cpawssab
"Monitoring" does not protect fish from selenium poisoning. Benga promises a lot of measures, most of which amount to experimentation or monitoring. The stakes are too high to approve another open pit coal mine on this basis. 2/n
Why do I say this? Because I read the submissions of the scientists to the JRP. You should read these, too, before you decide to take the proponents' promises at face value. That's what @Corblund did. That's why he said "I'm 100% opposed" to coal mining on the eastern slopes. 3/n
Read 12 tweets
16 Jan
Jason Nixon's reassurances are not credible. Look at the evidence, Albertans, and not at the pretty words. First, Alberta does not have a "robust" environmental regulatory system. Is there one environmental lawyer in Canada who would agree with this? 1/n #abpoli
One conservation biologist? One landscape ecologist? One conservation association? One environmental policy expert? One authority on the ecology of the eastern slopes? 2/n @Ablawg @ABWilderness @cpaws
Do you want to ask some of the landowners who have abandoned well sites on their properties? Indigenous communities living downstream of the oilsands? Or maybe have a look at the Cheviot mine site? 3/n
Read 18 tweets
16 Jan
One wonders if Alberta's Energy Regulator has any expertise about the costs of "restoring" open pit coal mines in mountain environments, or the past records of the companies being licensed to mine in this province. 1/n #Alberta #ableg @ReclaimAlberta @Pembina
What research has the AER done to establish that existing regs, incl. the MSFP requirements, are adequate? 2/n @OKWesternWheel @ABlawg @AER_news @SPhillipsAB
Because the record of open pit coal mining in the US, Australia, Turkey, and elsewhere really isn't reassuring. I don't see any evidence that mountains & their unique ecosystems can be put back together the way they were before being blasted apart. 3/n @CorbLund @paulbrandt
Read 4 tweets
16 Jan
This is a very informative and accessible (to non-scientists) explanation of how selenium gets into water, food, and animals, and how the Grassy Mountain coal mine would be likely to affect selenium levels in the Oldman River and throughout the watershed. 1/n
#Alberta #aboli
"[T]he top three sources of man-made selenium contamination worldwide in order of greatest to least are:
1. Mining
2. Irrigation
3. Feedlots
The Oldman River and South Saskatchewan watersheds already have large feedlots and supply irrigation." 2/n
"If additional pressures from a new coal mine were added to these watersheds, this area would be unique in the world as having all three top contributors to selenium contamination." 3/n
@JonathanWNV @HMcPhersonMP @SPhillipsAB @row1960 @DrewPAnderson @Pembina @cpawssab
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!