Manchester United have announced financial results for Q2 of 2020/21, incorporating the first 6 months of the season. This covers July to December 2020, so provides more insight into the impact of the COVID pandemic on football clubs. Some thoughts in the following thread #MUFC
#MUFC profit before tax for the first 6 months fell from £54m to £41m, as revenue dropped £22m (7%) from £304m to £282m and profit on player sales decreased £10m to £2m. Partly offset by £6m lower expenses and £13m more interest receivable. Loss after tax down from £36m to £34m.
Despite the reduction, a £41m profit during the pandemic times represents an impressive achievement for #MUFC. As Ed Woodward said, “While the disruption to our operations remains significant, we are pleased by the tremendous resilience the club has demonstrated.”
The main reason for #MUFC lower revenue was match day, which fell £52m (94%) from £55m to just £3m, while commercial dropped £29m (19%) from £151m to £122m. This was partly offset by broadcasting rising £59m (60%) from £98m to £156m, mainly due to return to Champions League.
#MUFC wage bill rose £13m (9%) from £141m to £154m, though other expenses decreased £19m (34%) to £37m, due to reduced business activity. Net finance income increased £13m to £20m, due to favourable swing in unrealised foreign exchange movements.
#MUFC £41m profit before tax is their lowest for the first 6 months since 2017. It is also worth noting that United tend to post losses in the second half of the year most seasons, e.g. £75m in 2019/20, so a full-year loss is still likely for 2020/21.
#MUFC have rarely made big money from player sales, but £2m in the first 6 months of 2020/21 is particularly low. Usually, very little profit from this activity is generated in the second half of the year, so United’s bottom line is unlikely to receive a boost here.
In 2019/20 #MUFC reported an operating loss of £13m (excluding player sales and interest) for the first time in ages. This is likely to be repeated this season, as operating profit fell from £36m to £20m in the first 6 months and there will probably be a large loss second half.
#MUFC revenue dropped £22m (7%) from £304m to £282m, which means this has fallen £62m from the £344m peak in 2019. The decrease would have been even higher if United had failed to qualify for the Champions League, as this has driven the growth in broadcasting income.
#MUFC match day income fell £52m (94%) from £55m to £3m, as all matches were played behind closed doors, whereas 15 home games were played in the prior year with fans in attendance. In a normal season this revenue stream generates around £110m full year.
#MUFC broadcasting rose £59m (60%) from £98m to £156m, mainly due to participation in the Champions League (Europe TV up £50m), though also benefited from revenue from 2019/20 games played after 30th June accounting close being deferred to 2020/21 accounts (domestic TV up £10m).
#MUFC commercial revenue fell £29m (19%) from £151m to £122m, as sponsorship dropped £25m (25%) from £99m to £74m, including no pre-season tour and prior year once-off credit, and retail was down £4m (8%) from £52m to £48m, due to Megastore closure for a month and lower footfall.
#MUFC wage bill rose £13m (9%) from £141m to £154m, the club’s second highest ever for the first half, mainly due to higher bonuses for Champions League qualification. If second half is the same, full year would be £307m, £23m (8%) higher than prior season’s £284m.
#MUFC £536m gross debt is £44m more than £492m prior year comparative, though only £10m higher than June 2020, as the club drew down £60m of Bank of America £200m credit facility. This is the highest debt since 2010, i.e. before the Payment in Kind loans were paid off.
#MUFC have a useful £81m cash balance, thanks to that £60m loan, but this is the lowest at this time of the year since 2015. United’s cash pile, as high as £308m in 2019, has taken a battering from a combination of COVID and transfer fees for Harry Maguire and Bruno Fernandes.
Higher gross debt and lower cash means that #MUFC net debt rose £64m (16%) from £391m to £456m. This means that net debt has increased by £138m (43%) in just 2 years since 2019 (£318m).
Furthermore, after two consecutive annual decreases, #MUFC transfer payables rose by more than a third (£34m) from £98m to £132m. That said, this is still a lot lower than the £258m peak in June 2018.
Similarly, #MUFC transfer receivables have grown from £17m four years ago to £60m, mainly due to Romelu Lukaku’s lucrative sale to Inter. United will hope that the financial challenges faced by Suning, Inter’s owners, do not impact the money they are owed.
As a result, #MUFC net transfer debt has increased from £41m to £73m, though this is still less than a third of the £229m balance three years ago in June 2018.
In the first 6 months #MUFC generated £75m operating cash flow, but spent all of this and more on bringing in £87m players (purchases £109m less £22m sales) plus £10m interest, £4m capex and £3m tax. This was funded by £59m loans, leading to £30m net cash inflow.
There are 3 main reasons for the £238m improvement between this season’s cash flow and prior season: (1) #MUFC spent £79m less player purchases (£165m vs. £87m); (2) working capital movements were £109m better, e.g. broadcasting payments slipped to 2021; (3) new £60m loan.
Although it has fallen from its peak, #MUFC still made a £10m interest payment in the first half. This will amount to £20m for the full-year, which is the highest in the Premier League, ahead of #THFC £14m and #AFC £11m. This is the cost of carrying so much external debt.
Despite the financial challenges, #MUFC have still found enough cash to pay their shareholders (mainly the Glazers) a full dividend. Nothing was paid in first 6 months, but £10.7m payment was made 7 days after these accounts. Works out to £23m annually (£112m in last 5 years).
Like many other clubs #MUFC have had to increase debt in response to the pandemic, despite posting a profit after 6 months this season. These results might look better than many feared, but it is worth remembering that figures are usually worse in the second half of the year.
Nevertheless, #MUFC are in better shape than most with their many commercial partners. While they will struggle with the financial challenges of COVID-19, Finance Director Cliff Baty said, “We are well positioned to weather the current uncertainty and optimistic for the future.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Arsenal’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 8th in the Premier League, won the FA Cup and reached Europa League last 32. Head coach Unai Emery was replaced by Mikel Arteta in December. Finances adversely impacted by COVID-19. Some thoughts follow #AFC
#AFC loss before tax loss widened from £32m to £54m, as revenue dropped £51m (13%) from £395m to £343m and expenses grew £18m (4%), offset by profit on player sales rising £48m from £12m to £60m. The loss after tax increased from £27m to £48m.
Impacted by COVID, broadcasting fell £64m (35%) from £183m to £119m and match day dropped £17m (18%) from £96m to £79m. In contrast, commercial rose £31m (28%) from £111m to £142m, thanks to new sponsorship deals. Player loans were down £1m to £3m.
Deloitte have published the 24th edition of their annual Football Money League, which ranks the world’s leading football clubs by revenue, this time covering the 2019/20 season. Some thoughts in the following thread.
The 2019/20 season was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a £1.0 bln (12%) fall in revenue of the top 20 Money League clubs from £8.2 bln to £7.2 bln. Broadcast and match day fell £822m (23%) and £227m (17%) respectively, though commercial rose £87m (3%).
In terms of Euros, match day fell €257m (17%) from €1.5 bln to €1.2 bln, driven by matches either being cancelled or played behind closed doors without fans. Match day revenue is largely derived from gate receipts (including ticket and corporate hospitality sales).
Chelsea’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 4th in the Premier League, were beaten in the FA Cup final and reached the last 16 of the Champions League, but their finances were adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Some thoughts follow #CFC
#CFC swung from £102m loss before tax to £36m profit, despite revenue dropping £40m (9%) from club record £447m to £407m, as profit on player sales surged £82m to £143m and expenses fell by a hefty £90m. After tax, improved from £97m loss to £32m profit.
All #CFC revenue streams decreased, impacted by COVID, though the damage was limited by the return to the Champions League. Broadcasting was down £18m (9%) to £183m, while there were falls in match day, down £12m (18%) to £54m, and commercial, down £10m (5%) to £170m.
#FCBarcelona recent accounts revealed major debt challenges, but they also highlighted some issues around different definitions of debt, so this thread will take a look at these using 2019/20 accounts from selected clubs and explain why Barca might have more problems than others.
Note: the clubs covered in this review are just a few of those that have already published accounts for the 2019/20 season, so it is not a ranking table as such, but there is enough detail here to illustrate the points made.
At the narrowest extreme, we have just bank debt, but the broadest definition covers total liabilities, which includes all financial obligations, including transfer debt, staff payables, tax liabilities, trade creditors, provisions, accrued expenses and even deferred income.
Arsenal have finally moved on Mesut Ozil and Shkodran Mustafi via free transfers, which raises the question of how good the club’s recruitment has been. Looking at this over a longer period, we can see that since 2010 they have lost (in cash terms) a cool £236m #AFC
The largest losses for #AFC in that period have indeed come from Ozil £42m and Mustafi £37m, but it has been a fairly consistent story of cash losses in the last decade. Highest profits generated by The Ox £22m, Martinez £14m and Bielik £5m.
Of course, from an accounting perspective some of these losses will have been reported as profits, as this is based on sales proceeds less value in the accounts, which is reduced each year by player amortisation. However, in the real world #AFC have lost a lot of money.
#Inter 2019/20 accounts cover a season under new coach Antonio Conte when they finished 2nd in Serie A, reached the Coppa Italia semi-final and came 3rd in their Champions League group, dropping to Europe League before being beaten by Sevilla in the final. Some thoughts follow.
This was the fourth year under the management of Chinese shareholders, Suning Holdings Group, after they acquired a 69% majority stake in #Inter in June 2016 from Erick Thohir’s Indonesian consortium, ISC. In January 2019, Lion Rock Capital bought a 31% minority share from ISC.
#Inter pre-tax loss widened from €40m to €97m (post-tax €102m), significantly impacted by COVID, as revenue fell €68m (18%) from €370m to €302m, partly offset by profit on player sales increasing €22m to €62m, though expenses rose €11m, including €15m exceptional items.