I don't know if there's a real risk for a Russian offensive, or if the movements are just part of the training pattern leading up to #Zapad21. However, this is one of my pet peeves - it's hard to tell an exercise from preparations for war. #turpo=#säkpol corporalfrisk.com/2016/08/13/exe…
"The only thing differentiating war from maneuvers is the last stage on the last day. The concentration of forces and the logistics is the same for both.” Lt.Col. Ben-Porat, AMAN, on lessons from Soviet repression of the Prague Spring (quoted in Rabinovich’s ‘The Yom Kippur War’)
Kofman has written quite a bit on the recent #Russia.n movements, and is certainly correct to preach caution and ask if it is different this time re water crisis and spring being a good for war. However, there's three issues were I question the reasoning:
The first is whether the high visibility of movements really is a sign that they are meant to be *solely* an intimidation tactic? A good argument can IMO be made for two alternatives: it is really hard to do large troop movements in today's day and age without being spotted, ...
...and it is entirely possible that the plan is to show enough forces to be intimidating, while still preparing to use them if that tactic fails. Yes, you would give up strategic surprise, but that is hard to achieve anyhow (see point above).
Second is the question about water supplies to #Crimea (and to a lesser extent about a land bridge). As far as I can tell, there is something of a water shortage brewing in Crimea, and spring arguably is a good time to wage mobile warfare.
Does this mean an attack is imminent? Probably not, and it is a train of thought that has been repeated annually the last few years. However, the fact that it didn't happen last year doesn't necessarily affect the likelihood of it happening (or not) this year.
There's a fine line between crying wolf and not taking this serious enough. As said, the basic premise of the shortage and time of year does make sense, the question is whether there's any reason to think it is different now from last year? I don't know.
Last issue is that it feels that the irrationality of human beings isn't factored in enough. War might not be a rational decision based on underlying factors and troop concentrations in the region more generally, but one should be careful to draw conclusions solely based on this.
Humans doing stupid things based on poor judgement has a long and varied history of leading to bad stuff. Again, this is not to say that war is imminent, but the region is worth keeping an extra eye on IMO. #turpo=#säkpol

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Corporal Frisk

Corporal Frisk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CorporalFrisk

3 Apr
Seems western hunters flying to Africa to shoot rare species is again in the headlines, this time in Sweden. I understand why this makes people upset, however, the situation is more complex than evil wannabe-colonialists wanting zebra heads above their fireplace.
Some of the serious threats to African wildlife (to the extent such generalisations can be done to such a vast continent holding any number of different habitats) include poaching (due to either value of animal products or to protect crops and livestock) and habitat loss.
Obviously, these are driven by local developments, and biodiversity simply isn't as interesting to most people if it means your living wage is directly negatively affected by it (I will argue this is true for most westerners as well).
Read 8 tweets
26 Feb
Table starting to be set. Have houseruled some of the deployments to slightly better portray the current situation. It's not perfect, but current BAP countries and EFP leads are there.
And then we'll go to two questions: do Russia grab islands? As part of the opening move we can land airborne troops on Bornholm and/or Gotland. This gives better sea control, but obviously tie up valuable forces. In the case of Gotland, it drags Sweden into the war.
Read 35 tweets
25 Feb
Norwegian ship engine manufacturer #BergenEngines to be sold to #Transmashholding. Now questions in Norway about what it means that the manufacturer and maintainer for a number of their key defense and coast guards vessels will be owned by oligarks close to Putin. #turpo=#säkpol
Notable that one of the areas where Russia still seriously struggles with covering the suppliers lost due to post-#Crimea embargo is boat and ship propulsion.
One of the solutions has been to buy propulsion solutions sold for "civilian" use or routing them through third parties, but this require companies willing to sell with few questions asked (much of the #exportcontrol in the field hinges on companies doing their due diligence).
Read 4 tweets
23 Feb 20
With #HXChallenge about to wrap up, here's an overview of what we now know: #HXhanke #turpo=#säkpol
#Eurofighter (still prefer #Typhoon) is strongly pushing the European angle with most major European powers having a stake in the program. Total sovereignty over mission data was also a big deal, and the (re)newed focus on EW-capabilities was also promoted
The Eurofighter has a bunch of strong cards: the independence angle is a big deal for Finland, as is the large number of major operators (second only to F-35) and the fact that it is likely the premier #QRA platform of the lot.
Read 17 tweets
31 Oct 19
So a short thread on the #Russia.n submarine exercise, what it is and what it isn't. Note that this is based on the assumption that the article linked is correct. 1/5 #turpo=#säkpol
It is a rather impressive surge. Eight nuclear subs (SSN/SSGN) represents a significant part of the Northern Fleet's fighting power. Add two SSKs for good measure, and it is no mean feat. 2/5
It's not a break out into the Atlantic to cut NATO supply lines. The operating area corresponds to how the Soviet/Rusdian fleets have planned to defend their SSBN strategic nuclear weapons carriers for decades, by creating a defensive #bastion. 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!