In its new Protection of Civilians Handbook @NATO also expands on #environmental protection considerations. A welcome development following last years #UNSC debates and side-events on environmental, peace and security. A short thread: 1/x shape.nato.int/news-archive/2…
The introduction explains that PoC also includes protection of " the natural environment, as well as necessary public services linked to civilian critical infrastructure, such as potable water, sanitation, and electricity". 2/x natolibguides.info/Environment
In the planning phase of NATO operations, environmental protection considerations should be part of the analysis, including a baseline study and and environmental impact assessment to ensure minimization and mitigation of environmental impacts 3/x
In case of encountering environmental damage (think of burning oil wells etc) , @NATO troops should have specific expertise e.g. engineers to 'Mitigate Harm' to civilian populations, in particular vulnerable groups. 4/x
The PoC Handbook also reflects on mitigating 2nd or 3rd order effects, including the impacts of its own military operations and how environmental damage can impact local populations. Will @NATO also look at the @ICRC Updated Military Guidelines on #PERAC? 5/x
The Handbook also recommends improved reporting on #environmental protection by its engineers.. Sharing information on targets, munitions types and amounts, available environmental assessment are helpful for humanitarians, deminers and local authorities for PCEAs 6/x
Anticipating a follow-up report by UNOCHA on Protection of Civilians and Protection of the #Environment in May 2021, we will follow-up with a more thorough analysis and events soon. Stay Tuned! 7/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Important new systematic review out on health effects #depleteduranium munitions in #Iraq by @ghiaub. Since its first use 1991, the use of DU spiked concerns among civilians and veterans, yet proper research has always been lacking. A short thread 1/x gh.bmj.com/content/6/2/e0…
First of all, lack of transparency by the US in DU use in 1991 and 2003 in #Iraq hindered identifying contaminated areas, clean-up operations and health monitoring of exposed populations. In 2014, we got the first set through and Dutch FOIA 2/x theguardian.com/world/2014/jun…
In meantime, all kinds of faulty research popped up, making outrageous claims over radioactive contamination by sketchy 'scientists' or denied full-out any effects, mostly by US DoD linked researchers, fearing accountability. Here's a good overview 3/x wise-uranium.org/pdf/dumyths.pdf
The #Abqaiq oil processing facility has been targeted multiple times in the past, from Al Qaida in 2006 to foiled plot in May 2019 and now with #drones. Strikes against oil infrastructure can have massive economic and #environmental consequences.
#PT at the #Abqaiq processing facility, 6.8 million barrels of crude oil are processed on a daily basis. Saudis claim the fire is now under control. The base is at least 1000km away from Houthi controlled area, so their likely #drone of choice is the UAV-X
Massive smoke plume visible with @NASAEarth view on September 14, 2019 coming from the #Abqaiq oil processing facility and nearby locations in #SaudiArabia that was hit by Houthis with #drones