Burnley’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished in 10th place, the club’s second highest Premier League finish, securing a fifth consecutive season in the top flight. Some thoughts follow #BurnleyFC #twitterclarets
After these accounts closed in December 2020 ALK capital acquired a majority (84%) shareholding in #BurnleyFC. Long-term local owners Mike Garlick and John Banaszkiewicz remain at Turf Moor as directors, working in partnership with new chairman Alan Pace.
#BurnleyFC profit before tax dropped from £5m to break-even, mainly due to COVID impact, including an additional month of expenses. Revenue fell £4m (3%) from £138m to £134m and expenses increased £9m, though profit on player sales rose £8m to £15m. Profit after tax was £0.5m.
All three #BurnleyFC revenue streams decreased, due to the pandemic: match day was down £1.7m (27%) from £6.3m to £4.6m; broadcasting fell £1.5m (1%) from £115.0m to £113.5m; and commercial was £0.8m (5%) lower, slipping from £16.5m to £15.7m.
#BurnleyFC wage bill rose by £13m (16%) from £87m to £100m (including 13th month), though player amortisation decreased £5m (14%) from £37m to £32m. Other expenses were up £0.7m (5%) at £15.5m, while depreciation was flat at £2m.
Despite the reduction, #BurnleyFC break-even is the fourth best result reported to date in the 2019/20 Premier League, only surpassed by #CFC £36m, #SUFC £19m and #NCFC £2m. This is pretty good, considering that no fewer than 8 clubs had losses above £50m.
Without COVID, #BurnleyFC revenue would have been £10.5m higher at £144m, due to £8.5m broadcasting rebate and £2m other lost income. Along with £9m additional costs incurred for additional month (wages £6m), this would have resulted in an estimated profit of £20m.
It is worth noting that #BurnleyFC extended their financial reporting period to 31st July 2020, a period of 13 months, in order to account for the impact of Project Restart. This mitigated some of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their accounts unlike most other clubs.
#BurnleyFC profit from player sales more than doubled from £7m to £15m, mainly Tom Heaton to #AVFC and Nakhi Wells to Bristol City. Despite the increase, this was still firmly in the bottom half of the top flight, way below the likes of #CFC £143m, #LCFC £63m and #AFC £60m.
#BurnleyFC have made profits for four years in a row, aggregating £77m. In fact, they have been profitable each season in the Premier League, including 2010 and 2015. Losses reported in the Championship in 2014 and 2016 were driven by promotion bonuses.
#BurnleyFC have rarely made big money from player sales, though profits increased to £66m in last 5 years against £14m in previous 5-year period. Only generated more than £10m profit three times in last decade. Only free transfers in summer 2020 (Hendrick, Hart, Lennon).
#BurnleyFC EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation & Amortisation), which strips out player sales and exceptional items, dropped from £37m to £19m, down from £50m peak three years ago. Mid-table in the Premier League, just behind #CFC £27m.
#BurnleyFC operating loss (i.e. excluding player sales and interest) widened from £2m to £15m, though this is actually one of the better results in 2019/20, a significantly lower loss than most other clubs, e.g. three were more than £100m: #EFC £175m, #LCFC £122m and #CFC £112m.
#BurnleyFC revenue fell for the second year in a row, but 2020 £134m is only £5m (4%) lower than club record £139m. The main reason for the decrease is the £8.5m broadcasting rebate linked to COVID delays, though this still accounts for 85% of total revenue.
#BurnleyFC £134m revenue is 14th highest in the top flight, though the gap to the Big Six is enormous, as they are more than £200m below #AFC £343m. Their 10th place in the Premier League highlights how much the club over-performed under manager Sean Dyche.
Most clubs’ revenue significantly down in 2019/20, due to COVID, averaging decreases of 13% and £39m, so #BurnleyFC 3% (£4m) reduction is one of the best performances. Helped by extending accounts to 31st July, whereas others with May/June closes had to defer revenue to 2020/21.
#BurnleyFC £134m revenue is theoretically enough for inclusion in top 30 of Deloitte Money League, which ranks clubs worldwide by revenue. However, they are not there, presumably because their revenue was pro-rated from 13 to 12 months, i.e. £124m, so just below £130m threshold.
#BurnleyFC broadcasting income fell £1.5m from £115m to £113.5m, as £8.5m rebate to broadcasters offset higher merit payment for finishing five places better. Other clubs deferred some revenue into 2020/21, as season extended beyond their 31st May & 30th June accounting close.
Much of Premier League TV deal is distributed equally, but part based on league position (merit payments, growth in overseas rights) & number of times shown live (facility fees). From 2019/20 each league place worth around £3m, so if #BurnleyFC fall from 10th, it will cost them.
#BurnleyFC match day revenue fell £1.7m (27%) from £6.3m to £4.6m, as they played 4 home games behind closed doors due to COVID. This is the second lowest in the Premier League, only ahead of #AFCB, and just 5% of #THFC £95m after move to new stadium.
#BurnleyFC average attendance fell from 20,534 to 20,268 (for those games played with fans), which was 19th highest in the Premier League, only ahead of #AFCB, and also below 10 clubs in the Championship. Ticket prices were frozen for 2019/20 for the seventh year in a row.
#BurnleyFC commercial revenue fell £0.8m (5%) from £16.5m to £15.7m, comprising other commercial £11.8m, catering £2.1m and retail £1.8m. This was the club’s second highest ever for this revenue stream, but still only 17th in the Premier League.
In 2019/20 #BurnleyFC had new principal sponsors. LoveBet replaced LaBa360 and AstroPay for shirt and sleeve sponsorship respectively, for a reported £7.5m a year, while there was a new 3-year kit deal with Umbro, replacing Puma who have been club supplier since 2010.
#BurnleyFC wage bill rose £13m (16%) from £87m to £100m, due to higher bonuses for better Premier League finish, though this covered 13 months. The increase would have only been £7m to £94m if adjusted for 12 months. Up £39m (64%) since first season after promotion in 2017.
#BurnleyFC reported £100m wage bill was 14th in the Premier League, probably higher than most would expect. If adjusted to £94m, based on 12-month period, would drop to 16th place. Either way, around a third of #MUFC £284m and #CFC £283m.
#BurnleyFC wages to turnover ratio increased from 63% to 75%, though this would be 70% based on 12-month wages. If we further adjust for COVID £10.5m revenue iloss, the ratio would fall to 65%. In short, one of the better ratios in the Premier League.
None of the #BurnleyFC directors received remuneration in 2019/20 (or previous year). This is in stark contrast to other clubs, most notably #MUFC and #THFC, where Ed Woodward and Daniel Levy each trousered around £3m.
#BurnleyFC player amortisation, the annual charge to expense transfer fees over a player’s contract, fell £5m (14%) to £32m following player departures. Reinforced their position as one of the lowest in the Premier League, only ahead of promoted clubs #SUFC and #NCFC in 2019/20.
#BurnleyFC made £29m player purchases in 2019/20, slightly less than prior season’s £33m, including Jay Rodriguez from WBA, Josh Brownhill from Bristol City, Bailey Peacock-Farrell from #LUFC and Erik Pieters from Stoke. One of the lowest in the Premier League.
Nevertheless, #BurnleyFC have spent £170m in the last five years, a significant increase on the £27m outlay in the previous 5-year period. After sales of £76m, net spend was £95m. However, hardly any expenditure this season, only bringing in Dale Stephens and Will Norris.
Before the takeover #BurnleyFC were completely debt-free, having used Premier League cash to repay previous loans. In fact, the club had £81m net funds, which is testament to their sound financial management.
#BurnleyFC were the only club in the Premier League without financial debt, which is in stark contrast to many clubs, e.g. six owe more than £200m: #THFC £831m, #MUFC £526m, #EFC £409m, #BHAFC £306m, #LCFC £219m and #AFC £218m (largely for stadium/training ground development).
Consequently, #BurnleyFC paid no interest in 2019/20,  which gives them a competitive advantage against many of their rivals who have to pay interest on their loans. As an example, the highest payments were #MUFC £20m, #THFC £14m and #AFC £11m.
#BurnleyFC also managed to cut transfer debt from £22m to just £2m. In fact, the net amount is also zero, as £2m transfer fees are owed to them by other clubs. By far the lowest in the Premier League, e.g. #AFC owe £154m. Contingent liabilities only £4m.
Despite £15m operating loss, #BurnleyFC had £64m operating cash flow (adding back £34m amortisation/depreciation and £45m working capital movements), but then spent net £22m on players (purchases £46m, sales £24m) and £4m on infrastructure to give £39m net cash inflow.
Unlike many clubs, #BurnleyFC pay their own way. In the last decade they generated £243m from operations, including £204m in last 4 years. Most went on players £105m, while £30m was invested in infrastructure (mainly training ground), £16m tax and £15m interest/loan payments.
#BurnleyFC cash balance almost doubled from £42m to £81m, which is actually the 4th highest in the top flight to date in 2019/20, though this included an advance of TV money from the Premier League.
However, that was then, this is now. Media outlets have reported that new owners ALK Capital put in very little of their own money, acquiring the club via a leveraged buy-out, thus placing debt on the club and using #BurnleyFC cash balances, similar to the Glazers at #MUFC.
This arrangement has not been confirmed by #BurnleyFC, but the media reports suggest that the purchase was financed by a £60-80m loan from MSD (Michael Dell’s investment firm), similar to a mortgage, while also using £30-55m of the club’s cash.
Based on the 9% interest MSD has charged for loans to other football clubs, this might cost #BurnleyFC between £5m and £7m a year. New chairman Alan Pace said the terms were “absolutely reasonable and in line with what can be supported by this club.”
A statement from ALK Capital tried to provide reassurance: “The new owners of #BurnleyFC are committed to investing in this club, the team and facilities over the coming years. Their actions will speak louder than any words.” That sounds good, but time will tell.
It’s not difficult to understand why #BurnleyFC were acquired, as they were in very good shape, arguably the best run club in the Premier League, not only competitive despite financial challenges, but also running a sustainable business model with no debt, even in a pandemic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

7 Apr
Manchester City’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished runners-up in the Premier League, reached the semi-finals of the FA Cup and the quarter-finals of the Champions League, and won the League Cup. Some thoughts in the following thread #MCFC
#MCFC swung from £10m profit before tax to £125m loss, as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in revenue falling £57m (11%) from £535m to £478m, while expenses increased £81m (14%). Profit on player sales was up £1m to £40m. Loss after tax was £126m. Image
The main driver of the #MCFC revenue reduction was broadcasting, which fell £63m (25%) from £253m to £190m, while match day dropped £13m (24%) from £55m to £42m. This was partially offset by commercial rising £19m (9%) from £227m to £246m. Image
Read 43 tweets
5 Apr
Brentford’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they narrowly missed out on promotion, finishing 3rd in the Championship before losing the play-off final to Fulham. Some thoughts in the following thread #BrentfordFC
#BrentfordFC swung from £24m profit before tax to £9m loss, as last year benefited from £14m sale of land. Revenue dropped £1.3m (9%) from £15.2m to £13.9m, while profit on player sales fell £2m to £25m. Investment in the squad meant expenses increased £14m. Loss after tax £10m.
Main driver of COVID-impacted #BrentfordFC revenue decrease was broadcasting, down £1.6m (18%) to £7.3m, while ticketing also fell £0.3m (9%) to £3.1m, partly offset by commercial rising £0.5m (18%) to £3.6m. Other income fell £1.6m to £1.0m, including job retention scheme £635k.
Read 40 tweets
5 Apr
Sheffield United’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 9th in the Premier League following promotion and reached the FA Cup quarter-finals, which was described by the club as “a respectable achievement”. Some thoughts follow #SUFC #twitterblades
This is the first year under new #SUFC owner Prince Abdullah after the High Court ruled that Kevin McCabe had to sell his 50% share to the Prince. This also triggered an agreement whereby the club had to purchase the stadium, training facility, gym, hotel and offices for £38m.
Following promotion #SUFC swung from £21m pre-tax loss to £19m profit, a £40m improvement, as revenue shot up £122m from £21m to club record £143m, though profit on player sales fell £10m to £4m and competing in the Premier League increased expenses by £72m. Profit after tax £18m
Read 40 tweets
1 Apr
AFC Bournemouth’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 18th, resulting in relegation to the Championship after five years in the Premier League. Finances were significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Some thoughts in the following thread  #AFCB
#AFCB loss almost doubled from £32m to a club record £60m, largely due to revenue dropping £36m (27%) from £131m to £95m, partly offset by profit on player sales rising £20m to £23m. Expenses increased £8m, while other operating income (mainly player loans) fell £1m to £7m.
#AFCB revenue decrease was mainly attributable to COVID, which contributed to broadcasting falling £35m (30%) from £116m to £81m, though match day was also down £1.5m (29%) from £5.0m to £3.5m. These reductions were partly compensated by commercial rising £1m (9%) to £11m.
Read 37 tweets
25 Mar
Quick look at the UEFA Champions League and Europa League 2020/21 revenue distributions for English clubs as at the quarter-final stage. Analysis of the amounts earned to date in the following thread #MCFC #LFC #CFC #MUFC #AFC #THFC #LCFC
I should emphasise that these figures are only indicative. They are based on UEFA’s revenue distribution guidelines, but also include some assumptions for the TV pool and rebates to broadcasters following losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
As it stands (at quarter-final stage), English clubs have earned the following amounts from Europe: #MCFC €92m, #LFC €90m, #CFC €89m, #MUFC €68m, #AFC €25m, #THFC €20m and #LCFC €17m. In the case of Manchester United, their figure is Champions and Europa League combined. Image
Read 18 tweets
23 Mar
Leicester City’s 2019/20 financial results covered “a season of considerable progress” when they finished 5th in the Premier League, thus qualifying for the Europa League, but their finances were significantly impacted by COVID-19. Some thoughts in the following thread #LCFC
#LCFC loss before tax widened from £20m to £67m, as the pandemic led to revenue dropping £28m (16%) from £178m to £150m, though profit on player sales rose £5m to £63m. Expenses rose £23m (9%), mainly due to investment in the squad. Loss after tax was £60m. Image
Significantly impacted by COVID, the main driver of #LCFC revenue decrease was broadcasting income, which dropped £20m (16%) from £128m to £108m, while commercial fell £7m (18%) from £36m to £29m and match day was down £2m (11%) from £15m to £13m. Image
Read 44 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!