Kerala Gold Smuggling: Hearing to resume today before Kerala High Court in the plea by @dir_ed Deputy Director challenging FIR registered by @TheKeralaPolice against unnamed officials of ED.
There is no prohibition on registration if separate complaint if first complaint was registered based on insufficient material: Raval relying on case law.
Raval citing various case laws to buttress case that filing of multiple FIR is allowed.
The question is can one investigating agency (Kerala Police) adjudicate whether a witness' statement recorded before judge is right or wrong or whether the witness statement in an audio CD is right or wrong: Mehta
ASG Raju: The fact that Swapna and Sandeep did not make their complaint to the Magistrate at the initial stages strikes at the credibility of the complaint. The complaint has to be rejected only on that ground
ASG Raju: There is no Section 120B in the second FIR. The wider case is in the first FIR. The wider case always encompasses the narrower case... The second case has to be quashed.
ASG Raju refers to case of Ram Lal Narang vs State Of Delhi
ASG Raju, referring to Swapan Kumar case: The second case cited by my friend goes in my favour. I am grateful. It takes the wind out of his submission.
ASG Raju: Sandeep is already there in the (first) FIR. There is no discovery. No discovery, no different version, it is the same thing. Same wine in a different bottle. Not permissible!
ASG Nataraj is making submissions whether Section 195, CrPC (Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence) is applicable.
ASG Nataraj: Nothing remains, the entire case is zero. I am not touching on facts. There is a total statutory bar for the police to proceed with this case.
#Breaking: #KeralaHighCourt reserves judgment in Enforcement Directorate's plea challenging FIRs registered by #KeralaPolice against unnamed ED officials. Court may pronounce verdict on April 16, mid vacation. Interim order, undertaking to continue
While hearing a plea for door to door vaccination, #BombayHighCourt enquired with the Union as to how could political leaders get vaccinations at home while the citizens could not.
Chief Justice Dipankar Datta: Important political leaders get a jab at home. How do political leaders get a vaccine at home and other cannot? There has to be a uniform policy.
Adv Sunil Gonsalves appearing for NIA submits that the statement which Waze wanted to give to the court somehow got leaked out in the media despite directions from court to file the same in Court as per procedure under CrPC.
Court: I never said don’t file. I only said proper procedure under CrPC has to be followed. This ought not have happened and this should not happen again.
ECI tells #KeralaHighCourt that on the eve of notifying #RajyaSabha elections for 3 vacant seats for members from Kerala retiring on April 21, Union Law & Justice Ministry had raised a question of propriety that popular will not be reflected if RS polls are held on April 12
Union Law & Justice Ministry had requested ECI to revisit the decision to conduct #RajyaSabha polls on April 12 since the Kerala Legislative Assembly elections were on April 6, #KeralaHighCourt told by Election Commission via a statement.
Since this issue of propriety was raised, the ECI kept the initiation notification in abeyance and sought legal opinion from a senior advocate, Advocate Deepu Lal Mohan submits on behalf of ECI
#SupremeCourt to hear Centre's application to close the criminal trials pending in India against two Italian marines accused of killing two fishermen off the coast of Kerala in 2012.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had said the victims’ families have been compensated
SG: You are aware of about the incident. Dispute was who can prosecute the Italian Marines. It was held that trial will be by Govt of Italy. Italian government was directed to compensate the families of those who were killed.
SG: Indians are the best negotiators and we have negotiated a good deal. They have paid 10 crores more. Victims have accepted it now
A five-member committee to be constituted comprising of eminent persons, experts well-versed with archaeology, two members preferably from minority community.
An expert to be appointed as observer for the committee
Committee prime purpose is to find whether religious structure standing at the disputed set is a superimposition, alteration or addition or if there is structural overlapping of any kind over any other religious structure
#MadrasHighCourt seeks response on the anti-corruption set up in the State, the degree of independence afforded to the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) and the number of corruption cases attended to in the last 3 financial years.
During the hearing today, Court also posed queries on how secure the DVAC is and the extent to which its own officers have indulged in #corruption.
“…we want to know how secure is your Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption", CJ Sanjib Banerjee orally observed
"We have no doubt you have a very attractive website, 20,000 pages of nothing written, but we want to get to the meat of the matter… Or are we in such a fool's paradise that we have to believe that there is no corruption over there?“ CJ Banerjee remarked.