#RuleofLaw breakdown in #Poland: AG Tanchev Opinion in Case C-487/19 is indeed unprecedented to extent that it offers unambiguous, crushing indictment-type assessment of a sitting head of state, in this instance, (unconstitutionally elected) 🇵🇱 President @AndrzejDuda (Summary ⬇️)
1/ Duda violated 🇵🇱/🇪🇺 law by appointing individuals to CECPA in Oct 2018 "despite the fact that an appeal had been brought against" relevant resolution & "its execution had been stayed" & "despite the fact that the proceedings before the [SAC] had not been concluded” (para 7)
2/ by appointing individual in charge of examining WZ’s appeal to CECPA on 20 February 2019 "despite the ongoing proceedings” (para 9)
3/ "by way of its *conduct*, is *interfering* in the process of appointing judges in a manner which risks compromising the future independence of those judges" (para 60 where reference to "State" must be understood as referring to i.a. Duda)
4/ by committing a twofold violation of Article 179 of 🇵🇱 Constitution/national rules as they must be interpreted in conformity with applicable 🇪🇺 law (paras 61-63)
5/ by *deliberately* violating a judicial decision which “demonstrates a lack of respect for the principle of the #ruleoflaw and constitutes per se an infringement by the executive branch" of ‘fundamental rules governing judicial appointments (para 65)
6/ by *deliberately* ignoring 🇵🇱 Supreme Administrative Court’s order of 27 September 2018 = Duda committed a "*deliberate* breach of that order" (para 85)
7/ by committing a "manifest and deliberate" violation of the order of 🇵🇱 Supreme Administrative Court, Duda is responsible for a "flagrant breach of the rules of national law governing the appointment procedure for judges" (para 87)
Conclusion: Not aware of any other instance where an EU AG has repeatedly emphasised manifest/deliberate/serious violations committed by sitting head of state when it comes to judicial appointment rules/compliance with judicial order. This is 🇵🇱 State Tribunal territory (end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laurent Pech

Laurent Pech Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPech

2 Mar
#RuleofLaw breakdown in #Poland: Just finished reading this very welcome/important judgment in Case C‑824/18 which however won’t decisively halt deliberate organised-crime type destruction of judicial independence due to inherent limits of ECJ jurisdiction in PR case (Thread)
1/ This limitation notwithstanding, judgment is extremely welcome as strongest confirmation to date that EUMS must respect EU Law in particular when it comes to "enactment of national rules governing the process of appointing judges” + connected rules governing judicial review
2/ ECJ essentially makes clear (but TBC by referring court) that Polish authorities have violated EU law by adopting legislative amendments with *deliberate/systemic* aim of *preventing the ECJ* from ruling on questions referred to it by (not yet captured) PL Supreme Admin Court
Read 13 tweets
19 Dec 20
Speaking of unlawful puppet body known as Poland's "Disciplinary Chamber" & its unlawful "decision" to void ECJ AK ruling, this development was mentioned for 1st time at ECJ level by AG Tanchev in his Opinion of 17 Dec 2020 in C-824/18

curia.europa.eu/juris/document…

cc @RULEOFLAWpl
@RULEOFLAWpl This is an important AG opinion which also for the 1st time mentions *and* makes use of Poland's Supreme Court resolution of 23 January 2020 which held the bogus "DC" not to constitute a court

On this resolution see my @reconnectEU post and paper

reconnect-europe.eu/blog/dealing-w…
@RULEOFLAWpl @reconnectEU Another "1st" at ECJ level: reference to lack of effective constitutional review in Poland but AG is still too diplomatic here as EU Comm, EU Parliament & CoE Parliament have been explicit about total lack of effective review + unlawful composition of CT

rechtersvoorrechters.nl/third-party-in…
Read 7 tweets
17 Dec 20
EU toolbox update: New regulation "designed to protect EU funds from being misused by EU governments who bend the #ruleoflaw" approved by EP after being approved by Council on 14 Dec

To get my head around on how new mechanism will work I have put together yet another slide 😎⬇️
Step-by-step overview of new general (#ruleoflaw) conditionality mechanism for protection of #EUbudget

(any mistake PLMK)

(warning: rudimentary design of slide not pre-approved by @JoelleGrogan aka @stickytrickylaw but hope to convince her/"them" to help out with version 2.0) Image
@JoelleGrogan @stickytrickylaw Thanks to feedback received from @rdanielkelemen, I have corrected previous step 3

version 2.0 below Image
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec 20
Based on my first quick reading of draft EUCO conclusions re #ruleoflaw conditionality mechanism, have to agree with @alemannoEU but let me add some quick comments in thread below

(Health warning: have spent about 7 hours on zoom today so my brain no longer fully operational)
Para 1 of draft conclusions: 2nd sentence is legally wrong/poorly drafted. Art 7 not only procedure to address "breaches" of Art 2 TEU values as already established by ECJ re Polish Sup Court purge (both item under Art 7 and subject of successful infringement action in 6198/18)
Paragraph 2 gives a veneer of credibility to recurrent nonsense from autocrats that destroying national checks and balances is somewhat something which can be justified in the name of their alleged “constitutional identity”. Very poor but not end of world

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Read 14 tweets
7 Nov 20
This is a great post by @ADimitrovs on new but not adopted yet #RuleofLaw conditionality mechanism & EU budget. Have just finished myself reading the 20,372 words of trilogue "4-column" doc re this latest likely addition to EU's toolbox. My first reaction assessment in 🧵 below
Title of not yet adopted Regulation (at @EUCouncil's insistence) no longer mentions #ruleoflaw & concept of "generalised deficiencies" with reference instead to "a general regime of conditionality". Cosmetic rebranding to assuage autocrats or bad omen? Let’s continue to find out
Article 1 (subject matter): surprise! the rule of law is back BUT “breaches” have replaced “generalised deficiencies” (again at Council’s insistence) = deliberate attempt to force Commission to not see the wood for the trees…
Read 17 tweets
6 Oct 20
Orban's #LexCEU held incompatible with EU Law yet Orban has already achieved its main goal: force out @ceu...

It was just irresponsible from @EU_Commission not to apply for interim measures in this instance

(updated overview slide of Commission's infringement (in)action below)
@ceu @EU_Commission This ECJ ruling will no doubt be mentioned in the 2021 #ruleoflaw country report...

When will the @EU_Commission learn that time is autocrat's best friend & that more reporting will do nothing to prevent creation of irreversible facts on the grounds...
@ceu @EU_Commission But Comm is not only institution which deserves criticism

+3 years to issue ruling on this crucial pressing issue is not serious

As for @EPP/@EPPGroup esp @ManfredWeber & @JosephDaul, shame on them for never enforcing their red lines, which as we now know were just bullshit
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!