Adv Abhishek Gupta says Deep Sidhu was in custody in the other FIR.
Bail was allowed on merit and on consideration of everything. We are asking for immediate release. They are playing w fraud with criminal process: Gupta
Gupta opposed Delhi Police's plea seeking police remand of Deep Sidhu.
The entire case and evidence against me the admitted videos on social media .. why custody: Gupta
This is malafide arrest. They are asking for police custody for four days for what? : Gupta
They want to negate the order of bail.. how is that possible: Gupta
We are a country governed by Rule of law. There is no question of remand. This is crime branch in both the cases. Why did they not arrest me before : Gupta
No, no they arrested him on April 13 : Court
We arrested on April 17 : Investigating Officer
I arranged for VC. It was between 1-1:30..order was communicates to us at 10:30 : Gupta
Oh so it was after order : Court
There is a specific categorical direction that there should be a departmental inquiry against such officers.. how can such FIR continue also : Gupta
At this stage, court can entertain section 167 application. Arnesh Kumar said court can release on bail.. Bail application is also ready : Gupta
I will not hear any application without reply : Court
I have a small submission to make : Deep Sidhu
I was in the same office.. this team also investigated during remand. I will co-operate fully. If I am taken out, I'll be put in quarantine.. my mobile location, CDR everything they have. They can have whatever number of hours with me in judicial custody: Deep Sidhu
My client has practiced law in Mumbai for good 12-13 years : Gupta
Adv Jasdeep Dhillon points out the delay in FIR.
Public Prosecutor makes submissions.
Public Prosecutor is not audible clearly.
They did not go to High Court to quash the FIR: Prosecutor
They are not seeking quashing. They are just saying don't give PC remand: Court
Why did you not arrest before : Court
It is the prerogative of the investigating agency: Prosecutor
Kya aapko ye ajeeb nahi lagta (arrest after bail) : Court
As far as right to take PC is concerned, law is clear that IO has the right to take PC to do proper investigation: Prosecutor
Article 21 is with reasonable restrictions...: Prosecutor
Need is explained by IO. The law is clear in 167(2). Factual matrix is clear that IO is in need..how can we say this is identical FIR : Prosecutor
Is there any stay in bail order on IO taking remand in another FIR.. IO is right is take police custody remand : Prosecutor
Order at 4 pm: Court
Please ask them to file reply to the application. We are moving bail also: Gupta
Keep all applications for 23rd: Court
Ask about the order at 4 pm : Court
Hearing over.
Delhi Court to pronounce order on Delhi Police plea seeking four-day police custody of Deep Sidhu in ASI Red Fort FIR at 4 pm.
"In any civilised society if public health system is
not able to meet the challenges and people die for want
of proper medication, it means there has been no
proper development. Health and education go side-by-side."
We all know .. you are not living in outer space.. it's not that labs are deliberately doing it.. very part of the medical system.. is stretched because capacities are not there and it can be done over night : Court
A special bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao is hearing the plea by Delhi Jal Board regarding the increase in ammonia for the drinking water supplied to Delhi from Haryana
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh: People are observing fasts on Ramzan and Navratri. Water is needed. A commission can be appointed for examining water at Wazirabad and Haidarpur.
Justice L Nageswara: Please mention the point
Singh: The point is Palla. It is the area where river enters from Haryana and ammonia needs to be checked there.
Justice Rao: Let us here Haryana
Senior Adv Purushaindra Kaurav appears for Haryana
#MadrasHighCourt directs State to prioritise persons with disabilities for #COVID19 vaccination irrespective of whether they have attained 45 yrs. State directed to take reasoned decision in 3 days on minimum age for such person to be vaccinated, after consulting UOI if required
Such priority group of PWD can be determined with reference to Centre's list.
Will also be open to state to consider administering #COVID19 vaccine to persons with disability above 18 yrs as indicated in 1st schedule of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016
Immediate steps should be taken by the State to ensure that vaccination centres are accessible to persons with disabilities by constructing ramps or other measures in accordance with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016: #MadrasHighCourt
Justice RF Nariman led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear appeal by Amazon against March 22 order by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court staying a single-judge order which had directed attachment of Future Group companies and Kishore Biyani's properties @amazon@FutureGroup
Hearing commences.
There are two points: maintainability and whether single judge order is right or wrong: Justice Nariman
Matter will anyways end up here. Why don't we finish hearing in April 27.
Supreme Court bench led by CJI SA Bobde to shortly deliver order in an appeal filed challenging Karnataka High Court's judgment of 2018 which quashed the Government's order handing over management of Mahabaleshwar temple at Gokarna to Ramchandrapura Math #SupremeCourt
CJI SA Bobde: We direct the overseeing committee shall function under the chairmanship of Retired Supreme Court judge Justice BN Srikrishna. Appellant shall hand over the charge to the Assistant commissioner who will report to the overseeing committee #SupremeCourt
CJI: The overseeing committee shall function adhering to all temple customs and traditions