Share this page!

व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
Twitter logo
19 Apr, 7 tweets, 4 min read
WRONG interpretation by @Sanjay_Dixit

Quoting RP Kangle (Verbatim) -

"Among sons of the same wife, the (special) share of the eldest (is to be) goats in the case of ब्राह्मण, horses in case of क्षत्रिय, cattle in case of वैश्य, sheep in case of शूद्र.

Here, कौटिल्य (1/2)
2/2
 Depicts how to do division of various animals by people of all four वर्ण to their eldest son respectively. This सूत्र has nothing to do with वर्ण by जन्म/कर्म.

This सूत्र of #अर्थशास्त्रम् is a guideline. Understanding सूत्र literature needs proper knowledge of #Sanskrit.
As usual वर्ण by कर्म gang leader has RTd it. It shows this "Vedic Wisdom" doesn't know Sanskrit.

Also, as indicated earlier, their agenda is clear - Divide the society by misinterpreting Sanskrit texts.
Also, this translation by Vachaspati Gairola is not wrong. He says the same.

"वर्ण क्रम से" phrase says that it is applicable NOT in one family but families of all four वर्ण.

People should spend time in understanding the text rather than using it for their agenda.
Along with कौटिल्य, this is also a deliberate attempt to misquote the scholar Vachaspati Gairola's Hindi translation (वर्ण कर्म instead of वर्ण क्रम)

@Sanjay_Dixit should apologize for trying to defame #अर्थशास्त्रम् to support his belief (वर्ण by कर्म).
Aha ! Flexible sleeper cell @RamaInExile is also here to roast his bread.

Desperation of mistranslation/misinterpretation of Dharmik texts and supporting the same are typical anti civilizational act.
Aha ! Instead of deleting misinterpreted propaganda, @Sanjay_Dixit has RTd following comedy tweet.

Here, this person has provide some laughable graphics to support this lie/propaganda/misinterpretation. 😀😀

Entire gang is on job.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with व्यासोन्मुखः

व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Vyasonmukh

व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
20 Apr
Thread -
Shallow understanding of @VedicWisdom1 on शूद्र and duties.

His claim : कृषि (Farming) is NOT work of शूद्र. This is FALSE.

Responsibilities/Duties of शूद्र are

शूद्रस्य द्विजातिशुश्रूषा वार्त्ता कारुकुशीलवकर्म च ।
#अर्थशास्त्रम् (1.3.8). See image. (1) Image
(2)
 Where is कृषि here ? It is in वार्त्ता (Economical activities).

कृषिपाशुपाल्ये वणिज्या च वार्त्ता ।
#अर्थशास्त्रम् (1.4.1)

कृषि (Farming), पशुपालन (Cattles), वाणिज्य (Trade).

So, farming is also work of शूद्र.
(3)
 Another FALSE propaganda to demean शूद्र (image 1).

Reality (image 2) - Explanation of 1st & 2nd tweets. शूद्र can do all activities related to economics as well as कारुकुशीलवकर्म (Performing/ non performing arts).

This person doesn't know any शास्त्र. Don't belive him. ImageImage
Read 22 tweets
व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
18 Apr
I saw the video. You correctly answered both questions instantly

Q.1 Definition of a Hindu
A. He is Hindu who believes in Vedas, Itihasa, Smriti, Aacharyas

Q.2 What is the sacred book in Hinduism ?
A. Supreme are 4 Vedas and then there are others in order

I stand with you. 👍
Person asking for proof/citation of definition of Hinduism etc. is unable to cross check multiple errors in the Sanskrit verse taken from भगवद्गीता being used in the video.

Looks like entire team is full of idiots and running an agenda.
Can he provide proof/citation of his own statement (image) from any Dharmik book or from any Acharya ?

Paddling such a nonsense and asking proof of Hinduism to others shows he is just an ignorant Hindu. A Rayta who uses catchy words/statements to impress others. Image
Read 14 tweets
व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
13 Apr
1.
 Thread on how to write numbers > 100 in #संस्कृतम्

100 = शतम् ... एकवचनान्त (Singular) नपुंसकलिङ्गी (neuter gender) ।
2.
 • 1000 = सहस्रम् ।
• 10,000 = अयुतम् ।
• 1 lakh = लक्षम् ।
• 10 lakh = नियुतम् / प्रयुतम् ।

All these are singular and नपुंसकलिङ्गी. Decline as गृहम् .

• 1 Crore = कोटिः ।
• 10 Crore = दशकोटिः ।

These two are स्त्रीलिङ्गी (Feminine) and decline as मतिः ।
3.
 • 1 thousand million (अरब) = अर्बुदम् ।
• 10 thousand million (खरब/खर्व) = खर्वम् ।

Bigger numbers are नीलम् , पद्मम् , शङ्खम् etc.

शतम् , सहस्रम् and bigger numbers are also referred in the literature as अनन्तम् in general.
Read 8 tweets
व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
11 Apr
There is an #Inscription at #Cambodia of a Hindu King यशोवर्मन् (889-910 CE). There, he has paid respect to Manu of #मनुस्मृतिः.

Manu was always revered in and out of #India since ages. Idiots should stop opening their mouth on #धर्मशास्त्रम् . Image
And apart from मनुस्मृति, there are many other स्मृति texts which are survived, commented and respected.

They are - याज्ञवल्क्य, गौतम, पराशर, नारद, अत्रि, व्यास etc.

Irony is - Such idiot Hindus are spreading nonsense w/o having zero knowledge on anything. Image
So @subhash_kak has RTd this nonsense on मनुस्मृति. This is alarming situation for Hindu Academia.

Mr. Kak ! This is not good. Image
Read 5 tweets
व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
19 Dec 20
Thread -
Bagastan #Inscription of #Iran and its connection with Gandhara (Ancient #India) & Hindu Kush (उपरिश्येन) mountains

• Antiquity : ~500 BCE
• Patronage : Darius, Achaemenid Empire

• Pic 1 - Location of Bagastan in Iran
• Pic 2 - View of the Inscription

1/5
2/5
 7th line of the Inscription mentions गन्धार (Gadaara in Persian) as a part of Achaemenid Empire.

Darius, in this Inscription, mentions about ~23 territories under his control. Gandhara is his eastern most territory.
3/5
 Gandhara (गन्धार) was part of 16 महाजनपद of ancient #India (~600 BCE).

Later it was part of Indian #Maurya Empire (~310 BCE) as its North-Western territory.

Due to its placement (West of River Sindhu), it was always a place of conflict between Indian and foreign powers.
Read 5 tweets
व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture
14 Dec 20
शुंग वंश के पतन के पूर्व (~75 BCE के पूर्व), #संस्कृतम् क्या कभी भी बोलचाल की भाषा रही थी ? अवश्य रही थी ।

संस्कृत विद्वान और पद्मश्री कपिलदेव द्विवेदी के विचार, प्राचीन प्रमाणों के साथ, इस सूत्र में रख रहा हूँ ।

पढिए, जानिए और अग्रेषित करें । 🙏

1/9
2/9
@ निरुक्तकार यास्क (~700 BCE)

• संस्कृत को "भाषा" कहा है और वैदिक संस्कृत से पृथक् माना है (न इति प्रतिषेधार्थीयो भाषायम् - निरुक्त 1.2)

• संस्कृत के प्राच्य और उदीच्य भेदों का उल्लेख + लौकिक संस्कृत से वैदिक शब्दों की निष्पत्ति (भाषिकेभ्यो धातुभ्यो ... निरुक्त 2.2)
3/9
@ पाणिनि (~500 BCE)

• वैदिक संस्कृत को छन्द और लोकबोली के लिए भाषा शब्द का प्रयोग और दोनों के बीच का अंतर भी स्पष्ट किया ।

• पूर्वी भाषा के लिए प्राचाम् , उत्तरी के लिए उदीचाम् आदि का प्रयोग ।
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @Vyasonmukh has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @Vyasonmukh!

Read all threads by @Vyasonmukh