Labour voter apathy (LDs not a factor) was the primary cause. 5/
So if Labour is still to be a power, what should they do to get Labour elected and the criminals in Government into the Hague to answer for their crimes?
A Story. Accountability. Don't split again. 6/
1. Get some headlines, LAB. Motivate those apathetic to your cause. 2. hold Gov to account, but not randomly. Do 🔼 in the context of this 3. Resolve the feud with the LDs as the only people that help are Conservative. 7/
This isn't the whole answer, but it's a start
How likely is it to be the outcome for #Labour?
If no one reads the data and then focuses on inconsequential internal battles?
Bugger all, and this will continue. 8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It was bad enough that Thatcher spent so many years provoking Northern Ireland violence when we should have looked for peace.
But if Johnson, who ended the peace with #Brexit lies we already know but he won't admit, sends in military assassins to kill those protesting his lies?
2015. Leaving the EU would be a crazy decision for our Economy.
'16. Brexit is not about leaving the single market or customs union
'16. Leaving the SMCU is incompatible with maintaining the UK
'16. We will not leave the SMCU⏬
'17 We voted to leave the Customs Union and Single Market and all EU institutions.
'17 There's no need for a border; there isn't one now.
'17 We need a border between NI and Ireland
'17 The border obviously will be down the Irish Sea
'17 No borders, technology instead
I've argued our Government shares more with USSR totalitarian "communists" than with anything in modern Conservatism (attached at end).
From state controls, to spending or resources, anyone can see that.
It begs questions.
Where are the real conservatives?
Are they a threat?
Just to recap a little for any new readers, since the start I've argued there was no big mastermind or master plan that led Conservatives to their "masterpiece", Populist #Brexit.
3 simple reasons
1. We saw the factions 2. We watched the seesaw 3. The endless inconsistency
In late 2016/2017 we tried to prove this objectively. We used press articles from Brexit, IndyRef, Quebec & Catalonia.
Brexit was unique in three areas:
Policy and terms were decided after referendum
There was no consensus for years
Multiple factions hijacked constantly 🔄🔁
Dean, avid listener to your show on Fridays, but never thought I'd need to write in. Then a blooming insurance claim (sorry not work from home).
As you always say, they're trying to wriggle out!
But the problem is the scam.
We need hot water, and they know it
We claim for a boiler replacement - rejected.
But they're using a bogus renewals argument to reapply an initial no claims period.
That's a first policy first term clause.
Otherwise we're not in contravention, there's no misrepresentation.
We should win
I mentioned a scam...
So while we're dealing with faux claim denial, the dog has become the best smelling member of the household.
Quite seriously - no one wants to live without hot water.
Showers aside it's still blooming cold.
So, dig into savings, buy the boiler now. Collect claim