The analysis of electoral results is full of distortion, just like pre-electoral advertising lies and soon to come lies in a battle of lefty agendas.

A system that at every level builds lies is corrupt. It guarantees the worst outcome for all

So what do the data say?⬇️
First GE19 (Hartlepool context)

Corbyn...honestly, I think he was a strategic disaster for Labour, but it's dishonest to say he was the main reason LAB lost.

It's also a lie to say #Brexit lost it.

The overwhelming and unaddressed factors?
Turnout, Split Votes 1/
Of the multiple datasets showing this, you can see more in Prof Theimo's excellent analysis [

Or dig further into on what the problem was; see the exhaustive [dataprax.is/tory-landslide…] 2/
More datasets address the primary reasons Labour lost GE19 than there are initiatives in making sure they don't reoccur.

My confidence is high. This is true since Labour has zero initiatives on them!

This is 60 of Johnson's 80 seats! 3/
#HartlepoolByElection
So how did Hartlepool play out?

If you're a politician or an offshore press baron, it's any self-serving statement regardless of its truth.

Like the Tories won a landslide: (they didn't.)
4/
Or Brexit mattered: it didn't at anywhere near the level claimed

#Hartlepool played out like the General Election.

Labour voter apathy (LDs not a factor) was the primary cause. 5/
So if Labour is still to be a power, what should they do to get Labour elected and the criminals in Government into the Hague to answer for their crimes?

A Story. Accountability. Don't split again. 6/
1. Get some headlines, LAB. Motivate those apathetic to your cause.
2. hold Gov to account, but not randomly. Do 🔼 in the context of this
3. Resolve the feud with the LDs as the only people that help are Conservative. 7/
This isn't the whole answer, but it's a start
How likely is it to be the outcome for #Labour?
If no one reads the data and then focuses on inconsequential internal battles?

Bugger all, and this will continue. 8/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hilary Abernathay. The #Covid19 & #Nexit "gifts"

Hilary Abernathay. The #Covid19 & #Nexit

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @atatimelikethis

18 Apr
So you think you can judge Right Vs Wrong as well as the next person? And Moral Vs Immoral?

Very well.

The next few tweets place you as Prime Minister facing the worst crisis of all our lives. #Covid19.

Will you be saviour? or slaughterer?

#Covid19 Part 1 "A Stitch in Time"
Concerning reports are coming out of China, as bloomin always. So ignorant they don't even clean their pans.

A non entity from a "science" group yabbers at you. What's this? He single handedly stopped MERS and SARS by "acting early".

Does this revelation wake you?

🟦 = points
You delete the tedious "SAGE" meetings, Dom can stand in.

Your assistant annoys you adding them back, "it's standard practice, sir". You learn WHO fear mongers have declared the virus a Pandemic.

"Let Dom handle it", he's the scientist after all

You use rarest of windows to
Read 10 tweets
12 Apr
Anna's point below.
How are they this incompetent?

Before Covid Team Johnson already had 24 major fails(e.g. 5G Huawei)

Beyond WTF, are you wondering HOW?

This thread answers with evidence 👉 []
The crowning achievement of this gov is...DATA SUPRESSION.
Sorry the thread's so long. It's necessary to explain the data.

You want an example? OK

How do you get a corrupt & nepotistic hiring policy for crucial Track & Trace?

Simple. Within 12 months of coming to office, reverse 30 years of Open Government⬇️

Another example? Ok
How did they get away with billions spent on corrupt non-compliant contracts?

Simple.

Covertly break the law. If you remove freedom of information, no one can see what you're doing.

Read 4 tweets
12 Apr
It was bad enough that Thatcher spent so many years provoking Northern Ireland violence when we should have looked for peace.

But if Johnson, who ended the peace with #Brexit lies we already know but he won't admit, sends in military assassins to kill those protesting his lies?
The context for assassins

mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/a…
A reminder lie by lie of how we got here.

I'm sorry, that's incorrect.

A reminder, lie by lie, of how Mr Johnson persuaded himself and half of you that everything was just fine.

Government Sociopathy

Read 5 tweets
8 Apr
The illustrated #Johnson timeline: Northern Ireland.

Or the depraved timeline of mendacious political deceit.

Both are accurate.

And while certainly, I have nothing but contempt, I believe the timeline to follow is verifiably factual

2015 - 2021 #Johnson's Ulster Lies in full Image
#Johnson on Northern Ireland

2015. Leaving the EU would be a crazy decision for our Economy.
'16. Brexit is not about leaving the single market or customs union
'16. Leaving the SMCU is incompatible with maintaining the UK
'16. We will not leave the SMCU⏬ Image
'17 We voted to leave the Customs Union and Single Market and all EU institutions.
'17 There's no need for a border; there isn't one now.
'17 We need a border between NI and Ireland
'17 The border obviously will be down the Irish Sea
'17 No borders, technology instead Image
Read 12 tweets
25 Mar
I've argued our Government shares more with USSR totalitarian "communists" than with anything in modern Conservatism (attached at end).

From state controls, to spending or resources, anyone can see that.

It begs questions.

Where are the real conservatives?
Are they a threat?
Just to recap a little for any new readers, since the start I've argued there was no big mastermind or master plan that led Conservatives to their "masterpiece", Populist #Brexit.

3 simple reasons

1. We saw the factions
2. We watched the seesaw
3. The endless inconsistency
In late 2016/2017 we tried to prove this objectively. We used press articles from Brexit, IndyRef, Quebec & Catalonia.

Brexit was unique in three areas:

Policy and terms were decided after referendum
There was no consensus for years
Multiple factions hijacked constantly 🔄🔁
Read 10 tweets
24 Mar
@deandunham

Dean, avid listener to your show on Fridays, but never thought I'd need to write in. Then a blooming insurance claim (sorry not work from home).

As you always say, they're trying to wriggle out!

But the problem is the scam.
We need hot water, and they know it
We claim for a boiler replacement - rejected.
But they're using a bogus renewals argument to reapply an initial no claims period.
That's a first policy first term clause.
Otherwise we're not in contravention, there's no misrepresentation.
We should win

I mentioned a scam...
So while we're dealing with faux claim denial, the dog has become the best smelling member of the household.
Quite seriously - no one wants to live without hot water.
Showers aside it's still blooming cold.

So, dig into savings, buy the boiler now. Collect claim

SCAM time
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(