You want autopsy for every patient? You have another prayer to stop vaccination? People are queuing up for vaccination..This is against public interest : Bench
Please ask your client if he wants to press prayer 3 (to stop vaccination). If it is so, then we will dismiss it because it is against public interest.
Once we find that one prayer is against public interest, then it is liable to dismissed...Argue only on 3rd prayer : Bench
Adv Nitin: Covaxin was permitted to be used in a restrictive manner, in clinical trial mode.
He refers to a document released in January, in Ministry of Health website.
Bench: Your document is from January, this is May. Much water has flown.
Nitin: The press release silent on under what provision of law, the permission to administer vaccine has been granted. I have perused all the documents, the provision of law is not mentioned.
Toxicity of drugs have not been mentioned by either of the drugs: Nitin
Nitin: In 2009, vaccination was done in the same mode to 5 lakh people. Almost 4.9 lakhs were found to be handicapped later. It will be history repeated.
This is not a petition of science. It is strictly on law, law has not been followed : Nitin
ORDER
This Court has already passed orders running into more than 800 pages dealing with various issues arising out of covid. : Bench
Bench: Litigants and members filing mutilple petitions dealing with the same issue. Prima facie, we are of the opinion that prayer 3 is against the public interest.
First contention raised is that it is not clear under what authority of law GOI has permitted vaccination
Second is that without conducting all stages of clinical trials, vaccines have been permitted to be administered
Vaccines are gene therapeutic products and same is being administered without following National Guidelines published by ICMR : Bench
It may lead to disastrous consequences, petitioner submits..... : Bench
It is submitted that administration of Covaxine, covishield is illegal and harmful without clinical trials : Bench
We may also note that 117 of the petition is that objection of petitioners are only to two vaccines.
The first petitioner is an army officer. However, it is not claimed that he is an expert in the field of vaccines. Credentials of 2nd and 3rd petitioners not mentioned: Bench
Very fact that this petition is made to stop vaccines shows that it is not filed in public interest. Therefore, not necessary for us to go into other prayers.
We had given an option whether petitioners want to withdraw the petition.
Hence, we decline to entertain the petition only on the ground that it is not filed in public interest.
Fit case to impose exemplary costs as the hearing of this petition has consumed 45 minutes, which could have been used to hear important matters: Bench
Since 1st resp is an army officer, we propose to impose costs only to 2nd and 3rd resp, to pay Rs 50,000 to CM Relief Fund. Cost shall be paid within one month: Bench
Let us go to the main matter.
Mr. Mohan, without going into anything, let us tell you, your capacity to file memos is UNMATCHED.
Bench: So AG, see the scenario, somebody who has got first dose will not get second dose, he will be diverted to private players. So ultimately it is helping whose cause.
AG: This will have to be a policy consideration of the state govt.....is all I can say.
Bench: Both Central and State govt should take a call on this.
We are not policymakers, in absence of concrete policy it will lead to violation of Article 14.
But this will compel person to go to private players for taking first dose.
CJ: Now we are going to record PHANA's statement that they are even administering Covaxin.
Amicus: How exactly is the vaccine to a Covid recovered person is to be administered second dose. CG has to clarify this. How are the 3 months period is to be computed?
Pithani was arrested under S 8(c) r/w 20(b)(II)(a),27,28 & 29 r/w 27-A & 35. He was produced before Court in Hyderabad for transit warrant after which he has be brought to Mumbai.
CJI NV Ramana: This judgment is regarding the frequent orders passed particularly by the UP courts relating to grant of anticipatory bail.
CJI Ramana: Here we have two cases where the Allahabad high court while dismissing the plea on merits granted 90 days time as protection. This was examined by us #SupremeCourt
CJI: question before us was whether the high court while dismissing the anticipatory bail applications of the respondents has granted them protection from arrest.
Court will hear today the recall application filed by the 4 leaders seeking recall of May 17 HC order by which the bail granted to the 4 leaders by special CBI court was stayed by HC.
Calcutta High Court to hear petition seeking probe into post poll violence that rocked West Bengal after the announcement of 2021 Assembly elections results.
Transfer petition in question under S 407 CRPC was taken up by a Division Bench of #CalcuttaHighCourt on May 17 based on an email sent by CBI to the Court and a mentioning by ASG YJ Dastoor