EXPLAINER: new projections for the next 5 years by @metoffice and @WMO indicate that there's a high chance that one of these years is 1.5°C warmer than average preindustrial levels.

What does this mean?
A short explainer.

#ClimateAction

(1/n)
hadleyserver.metoffice.gov.uk/wmolc/
The 1.5C level in the @metoffice announcement should not be confused with the 1.5C limit in the Paris Agreement.

The Paris targets refer to global warming - that is, the temperature increase of our planet once we smooth out important year-to-year variations (see👇)
(2/n)
Even in a stable climate, global temperatures differ from year to year because of noise in the climate system.

(3/n)
E.g., an el Niño year will be slightly warmer than other years, or after a large volcanic eruption global temperatures will be temporarily much cooler.

In both cases the global temperature in these years does not represent the long-term warming. (see @NCAR_Science fig👇)
(4/n) Figure from https://news.ucar.edu/13308/el-nino-la-nina-enso
In a world that has warmed by 1.5°C we expect half of the years to be warmer than 1.5°C, and the other half cooler.

(5/n)
If you want to understand this better, check out a @CarbonBrief explainer I wrote shortly after the Paris Agreement with @CarlSchleussner:

(6/n)

carbonbrief.org/guest-post-int…
For the scientists amongst you: we also wrote this up in a contribution to @theAGU journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Getting It Right Matters: Temperature Goal Interpretations in Geoscience Research

(7/n)

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
In conclusion: A single year hitting 1.5C doesn't mean the Paris limits are breached, but is nevertheless very bad news.

It tells us once again that #ClimateAction to date is insufficient and emissions need to be reduced urgently to zero to halt #GlobalWarming .

(end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joeri Rogelj

Joeri Rogelj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoeriRogelj

18 May
*Great NEWS*
Today @IEA published its #NetZero2050Roadmap-a scenario that brings global CO2 emissions down to #NetZero by 2050.

This is the first time IEA presents a detailed picture of how the global economy can be transformed in line with 1.5C (1/n)

iea.org/reports/net-ze…
A detailed look at the report shows that @IEA has done a thorough job.

Modelling choices underpinning the pathway are well argued, reliance on speculative technologies is limited, and the carbon budget is in line with the most ambitious pathways available in the literature (2/n)
In addition, the report also presents a unique collaboration between two of the core flagship teams of @IEA: The World Energy Outlook and the Energy Technology Perspectives.

This in itself presents an exciting development.

Congrats, @Laura_Cozzi_, @TimurGuel and team (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
31 Mar
Today's news from Australia's @Science_Academy latest climate report: "limiting climate change to 1.5°C is now virtually impossible"

I'm quite confused by their finding & scientific evidence backing it up is questionable at best.
#auspol

- a thread (1/n)
smh.com.au/environment/cl…
The @Science_Academy's analysis starts from carbon budgets reported in @IPCC_CH's 1.5°C Special Report's Table 2.2 (orig. below).

Then makes adjustments & updates.

Having had the pleasure to compile Table 2.2 for #SR15, let's compare and try to make sense of the numbers

(2/n)
The @Science_Academy's table starts from IPCC's 1.5C carbon budget for a 50% chance.

(Note1: the table quotes either a wrong likelihood or a wrong number, but that's a detail)
(Note2: IPCC Table 2.2 is in GtCO2, the table below in GtC. Multiply by 3.6 to convert to GtCO2)

(3/n)
Read 14 tweets
17 Mar
How can #NetZero targets be made rigorous, fair and transparent?

We published 10 guidelines that can help

Details are buried in the supplement of our @nature comment.

Here I'll be going through them, one per day

@COP26 @topnigel @PEspinosaC

(1/n)

The supplement contains an overview table (👇) and a detailed set of guidelines for #NetZero targets

They cover:
I. Scope (of target)
II. Adequacy & Fairness
III. Long term roadmap

It's a long list - so let's get through it one day at a time

(2/n)

nature.com/articles/d4158… Image
Point I.1: Define the global climate goal your #NetZero target contributes to

The #ParisAgreement aims to hold warming "well below 2°C" and pursues to limit it to 1.5°C. Rigorous targets should be more specific than that.

(3/n) Image
Read 17 tweets
16 Mar
Explainer:
what are #NetZero targets?
why do they matter?
and why do vague targets lull the world in missing its climate goals?

A (long) thread with scientific and policy background on our recent @nature commentary

(1/n)
#ClimateScience @NatureNews
nature.com/articles/d4158…
What are #NetZero targets?

#NetZero targets are key benchmarks towards a world where we avoid the worst of climate change. But if defined vaguely, they leave a lot of wiggle room and can compromise achievement of the #ParisAgreement

We provide guidelines to avoid this.

(2/n)
First, why are there #NetZero targets?

Global warming is proportional to the total cumulative amount of CO2 we emit. Halting global warming thus means we have to stop adding CO2 to the atmosphere.
Rigorous net-zero CO2 targets achieve at least that, but also more...

(3/n)
Read 21 tweets
16 Mar
"Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix"
In a new @Nature piece we explain how countries & companies can set rigorous, fair and transparent net-zero targets.

Thread (1/n)

With @Oliver_Geden, @CowieAnnette & @ReisingerAndy
(@NatureNews)
nature.com/articles/d4158…
Countries and companies around the world are declaring net-zero targets - all in their own way, often in vague terms, and mostly without considering what it means for others or where it leads to. (2/n)
The inadequacy of these individual targets lulls the world into missing the global climate goals of the @UNFCCC Paris Agreement. (3/n)
Read 6 tweets
15 Oct 20
Solving the #ClimateCrisis too expensive?
Think again.

#COVID19 recovery stimulus dwarfs green energy investment needs for a 1.5°C-compatible world

A thread on our new scientific analysis published in @ScienceMagazine
In the wake of the economic crisis caused by the #COVID19 pandemic, governments have pledged unprecedented amounts of economic recovery and stimulus.

We tally up all pledges and compare them to what we would need to transform the global energy system to #netzero by 2050 (2/n)
We show that the 12.2 trillion USD in pledged #COVID19 recovery is roughly double the amount of all low-carbon energy investments required globally over the next five years to put the world on track for a 1.5°C pathway. (3/n)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(