I finished Ayn Rand's “The Virtue of Selfishness” the day before and will thus seal this chapter in my reading list firstly. “The Fountainhead” will follow someday else. Attached to this post you see, piled up next to this last book of mine I read, the books of hers I read so far
(Books in the background unrelated)
And because I am not going to share the “essay” on her separately on Blogpost because the Mises one was already one hell of a workload I do not need to experience again. Wait until I am ready to present it to you.

Instead, I will write a
short thread on what I now thing of #AynRand and her #Objectivism, although I do not warrant definitiveness even on my own views. It'll just be a pile of thoughts and opinions.

So, many say that her views are blunt, juvenile, populist, even misanthropic and fascist. Prior to
reading beyond “Atlas Shrugged”, I already thought that (1) those people are wrong, (2) those people misunderstood what Ms. Rand conveyed in her tome, and (3) that those people should read more than one book by an author before they shape an opinion about that person, especially
when the whole bibliography surpasses more than that one book. When I read “For the New Intellectual” (I still think that this title is cringey), I said that people should read that book: It's shorter, it's non-fiction, thus clearer in its message, and it spans across her fiction
writing, gathering the most important excerpts from her books, esp. ASh.
Ms. Rand's obvious hot topic is individualism, liberty, and free-market policies at the zenith. This already rejects the idea that she is misanthropic or even fascist. She is an earnest loudmouth, that's
true, and her fiction writing oftentimes lacks depth and a more prudent dramatis personæ. That's why I had to stop reading ASh at first and take a break from it: Not because it was so long—I managed to read through Anna Karenina in one attempt—, but because it was so flat in its
plot. But in the end, I did enjoy it, especially the third part. But her non-fiction writing—“For the New Intellectual” and “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal”—are far more accessible especially when you receive it with an open mind, and leave your prejudices behind. I still do not
agree with three fourth of what she said, but I now understand her better. I also would otherwise have never heard that she is not against a state, as many modern-day Libertarians are. She is in favour of a purely regulatory state, she rejects the welfare state.
This brings up
the issue of some of her rather half-baked ideas: When one reads through her essay on how a less interventionist state could finance itself, she builds up on wishful thinking that it could work without taxes, that people would keep it juiced simply because they approved of its
regulatory work. (Viz. her essay “Government financing in a free world”) It resembles a donations programme as we see it with many Subsack newsletters, which also feature freemium products. Whether a gov't could function this way stood up to question.

There are also many other
similar questions in her work I will not address here but in a separate text I will not share as a blog post (as I said, more work than time for it; will maybe share some first pages and the rest as a PDF), but all in all, there is one thing that can be said: Instead of decrying
her as some of the former 2th Century Motorway Company decried the earnest businessmen and the gov't that did not intervene when their house of cards collapsed, it would be better to read up on her. The books are cheap, and reading whatever can be read is still better than hangin
around in one's virtual echo chamber, begin spoon-fed information that confirm one's personal bias. Not false information, but one-sided information without a counter-weight to balance one's beliefs. She is worth it, as Atlas Shrugged is just one part of her work, and honestly
not her best one, especially in terms of representation, despite her own and Nathaniel Branden's laudatory citations in their essays. She is less extreme than she is represented as, but she is as loud as she is also perceived. The media buzz does her wrong to some degree.
@threadreaderapp Please unroll.
1. Rand, Ayn (1996). Atlas Shrugged. London: Signet Books.
2. Rand, Ayn (1963). For the New Intellectual. London: Signet Books.
3. Rand, Ayn (1967). Capitalism – the Unknown Ideal. London: Signet Books.
4. Rand, Ayn (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness. London: Signet Books.
If you have any favourite quotes from #AtlasShrugged, go ahead and drop them hereunder for me. I am currently looking through the book to seek anything Rand herself might not have mentioned in her essays.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Oliver Bender

Oliver Bender Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @OliverBOfficial

28 May
Just heard another three-way interview on the global #freemarket and it was mind-bogglingly asinine, not only because no “economic representative was invited but also because it was thus so easy to forecast what was going to be said.
I do agree that we need labels to indicate which products were manufactured through child labour, to boost consumers' independence of choice, especially the capability of informed choices. When products are unknown whether they have been produced through child labour or note, how
can I make a choice I can approve of? Of course many apologetics would either say: “Let consumers decide through their purchases whether they want to have more or fewer (or maybe no) labels” or “Tell producers to examine their supply chains and attach labels on their products”.
Read 13 tweets
8 Feb
Kürzlich (gestern) habe ich auch wieder gelesen, dass es noch immer Menschen gibt, die plädieren, dass auch sonntags Geschäfte öffnen dürfen sollten. Diesen Menschen würde ich empfehlen, doch einfach einen Arbeitgeber zu suchen, der ihnen ein Gleitzeitmodell eröffnet, damit sie
auch unter der Woche einkaufen gehen können. Ich sehe keinen Grund, warum dafür mitunter Menschen an ihrem (teilweise) einzigen freien Tag in der Woche zur Arbeit gerufen werden sollten, unter dem Vorwand, dass sie doch entweder etwas Richtiges hätten lernen sollen oder sich
einen neuen job direkt suchen sollten, wenn ihnen eine sieben-Tage-Woche stinke. Wie gesagt, diesen Ball kann man den Bewerben des Sonntagseinkaufs entgegenwerfen: Dasselbe Prinzip, nur auf links gedreht.
Es ist halt die gewisse universelle Albernheit im freiheitlich-ökonomi-
Read 8 tweets
7 Feb
Gestern noch einen recht interessanten Text über die verschiedene Aussprache des NL in den Niederlanden selbst und in Flandern gelesen, dessen stark verkürzte Konklusion mich leider herb enttäuscht hat. (Zitat hierunter)
Zitat: Hout, Roeland & Schutter, Georges & Crom, Erika & Huinck, Wendy & Kloots, Hanne & Velde, H.. (1999). De uitspraak van het Standaard-Nederlands. Variatie en varianten in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Artikelen Van de Derde Sociolinguïstische Conferentie.
Abgesehen davon: Kann mir irgendjemand allgemein bildende Texte zur Frage nach der Phonetik im Niederländischen empfehlen? An sich ist es für einen Deutschen natürlich übersichtlich und nachvollziehbar vom bloßen Zuhören, dennoch wäre es einfach ganz hilfreich. Nicht unbedingt
Read 6 tweets
20 Oct 20
To think that nullifying the rural states by abolishing the #ElectoralCollege was going to solve anything other than manifesting a liberal leadership for decades (as Trump did by nominating #ACB for #SupremeCourt), is to ignore the consquences of the urban-rural migration. 1/X
Link: jstor.org/stable/4286374…

As all the jobs like in the great cities, people move to the cities. The first consequence: Cities bloat, ready to implode because space is finite. The only action is to expand outwards, while prices downtown skyrocket. In the meantime, the | 2/X
rural areas decay because there are too few people to hire, while everyone is pilgrimaging to the cities. Without jobs, people seek relief elsewhere, such as in drugs, or otherwise become unemployed or criminal. For most, though, they just turn citywards too, leaving behind | 3/X
Read 16 tweets
20 Oct 20
I know what the results are supposed to tell us, but still I am sceptical about what those who said that they were disillusioned by #Democracy might think about their desired future outlook, what should change and how this change should be achieved.

bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/g…
Of course not every person who says that it rated Liberal Democracy rather negative prefers authoritarian or generally totalitarian structures; but we do have a tendency towards incentives that could require a more proactive state with further duties and rights to intervene in
society (surveillance, police state) and the market (Socialism at worst).
As I said, not everyone falls through this riposte, not everyone would like to see a Big Brother or a GUlag-building totalitarian who sent rich people off because they are rich.
But we clearly walk into
Read 6 tweets
11 Jul 20
What I cannot understand is that some people still seem to believe that the elections in #Belarus are going to proceed justly and with equal chances to every candidate running for president in this country, so that #lukashenko had any reason to really feel nervous. This election
is going to be as farcical as any election in the #DPRK has always been. If Lukashenko really showed signs of nervousness, he pretends, to uphold a façade of fairness and equality in this race for president.

jamestown.org/program/belaru…

Whatever they write in these regards, they
are wrong to insist anything into the direction of an election that saw him in a chance to lose it. He had opponents arrested as had #Putin in #Russia. Of course Lukashenko is dependent on Putin's support, and likewise does Putin favour allies ruling over post-Soviet nations.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(