Everyone’s trying to sell you something, or take something off you, or get you to do something.
Everyone’s out for themselves.
No one can be trusted.
People are greedy.
People are lazy.
It’s a dog-eat-dog world.
Our media is our enemy – and much of our schooling too.
We’re victims of cognitive imperialism – and the invading empire has established its outposts in the hinterlands of our minds.
Here's what our media keeps hammering home:
–Selfishness is king
–Greed is queen
–Profit's our God
–The economy’s our religion
–Ownership’s our temple
–Wealth's our sacrament
–Ruthlessness is admirable
–Acquisition's commendable
–Always want more
–Winner takes all
Happy now?
4/31
I’m not sure I am.
“Me neither.”
And that’s the interesting thing, isn’t it? This obsession with having more, needing more, buying more isn’t making any of us happy. In fact, the very reverse.
The human world is full to the brim with unhappiness.
We’ve been infected by ideas about the supreme value of money and possessions, and it’s not doing any of us much good.
“Apart from the privileged 0.1%...”
And there’s the irony. I think it’s harming them, too.
It’s a suit of armour.
“Armour?”
Hm. I can see that sounds a little disappointing to you… Well, maybe more a shiny, chainmail shirt…
“Like Frodo’s?”
Well, maybe not quite up to his standards. I’ve no mithril to hand. Perhaps not a chainmail shirt. Perhaps more of a shield.
8/31
“A shield?”
A shield.
“For medieval battle re-enactment?”
No, for something much more modern. A shield to ward off the ideas that are making us unhappy. Like a software firewall, but for the mind.
“You’re right. I’m not disappointed.”
I’m glad.
“Everyone should have one.”
9/31
I call this firewall of the mind a Shield of Values. It takes a little setting up.
A shield needs a frame–to give it shape, make it distinctive, make it a thing.
The shield we’re building–a shield of values–needs to resist the self-harming, eco-destructive concepts jeopardising the modern age. It needs a straightforward frame that out-simplifies the lies.
11/31
A shield of values needs a frame like this:
(i) Nurture others.
(ii) Nurture humanity as a whole.
(iii) Nurture and protect the biological world.
That’s it.
Objectives so simple and uncontroversial they feel like common sense.
Objectives that give your shield its shape.
12/31
Just like the human chest our shield needs ribs: to hold the frame in place, it ensure it keeps its shape. These are the values underpinning our objectives. Values like these:
(i) Life is precious.
(ii) We’re all life: water in the same river; sparks from the same fire.
13/31
Values like these:
(iii) All living things are inherently equal, all deserving of compassion and respect.
(iv) All living things, to the best of our ability, should be nurtured and loved.
But what imbues these values and objectives with authority – makes them grab your attention, your imagination, your commitment? What gives this frame of ours, this shield of values, its strength?
Any shield of values – any morality – needs a backbone, a spine, otherwise it becomes just whim: a pick-and mix selection of values and aspirations chosen almost at random from the normative chaos our society keeps thrusting down our throats.
Life is our tangible, ever-present, utterly evident source of purpose & meaning. Where else can purpose come from except life?
Dead stuff has no purpose–except the purpose given it by things that live.
Purpose originates from life… & life’s ultimate purpose? Life itself.
19/31
We see this embodied in the vast complexity of the biosphere, in the history of evolution, in the desire of every living thing to live.
It’s this–the centrality of life–that provides the ultimate authority and strength-giving spine for your shield.
Now we have the frame, the ribs & spine, but our shield also requires a skin.
What kind of skin does a shield of values need?
It needs a lie-deflecting but truth-porous skin of quick-fire principles that derive directly from the frame & ribs & spine…
We have our shield of values: frame, ribs, spine, skin. It’s well-made and strong.
But it needs to be a shield anyone can use, to defend themselves from the corrupting narratives of a greedy and heartless world.
Our shield needs a strap to hold it tight against our arms.
26/31
Universality is that strap. The universal applicability of our values. The universal applicability of being alive, of valuing life. This is our shield’s grip and buckle and strap. This is how we bind the shield to us.
The universal applicability of our values is what allows us to stand together, shoulder to shoulder, holding up our shields, resisting the bombardment of a captured press, a lackey media, the super-spreading of malign propaganda and lies.
“Violence,” you say, “is the last refuge of the incompetent.”
I can only agree. It’s a great saying. Whose is it?
“Isaac Asimov, I think. I’m not sure.”
The science fiction writer?
“Yes.”
I love the guy. He said a lot of great stuff. Have spacesuit. Will travel.
“No, that was Heinlein.”
Ah. Right-wing libertarian Heinlein. I loved a lot of his stuff, too. Starship Troopers. Stranger In A Strange Land. Shame he was a right-wing libertarian.
“He was probably ok with violence, too.”
Shifting back to the topic of violence….
“Shall we?”
Why not? I agree with you.
“With me or Isaac Asimov?”
Either. Both.
Occasionally we glimpse the foul cesspit of Johnson's mind.
How he must scorn climate activists if ‘bunnyhuggers’ is how he sees them....
How he must scorn gays if "tank topped bum boys" is his description of choice....
1/3
How he must scorn Africans if he can write of picaninnies with water melon smiles…
How he must scorn the British public if he feels able to so easily lie…
How he must scorn women if he thinks only “feeble” men can’t “take control of their women”…. 2/3 #BorisJohnson #cesspit
How he must scorn nurses if he’ll applaud them then cut their pay….
How he must scorn school children if he’ll send them home hungry….
How he must scorn anyone other than himself – a man whom he holds in the highest regard! 3/3
I don’t suppose you’ve ever made a mistake?
“Why would you ask that?”
Because I’ve just made one.
“Ah, I see… And you don’t like making mistakes, do you?”
No.
“Want to tell me?”
No.
“Are you sure?”
I’m sure.
It’s…
It’s something you said.
You made me realise something.
“I’m sorry. I wouldn’t have intended–”
You said, “Is it ethical to have so many enemies? Is it ethical to see so many people as ‘enemies of the people’?”
“I said that–but that doesn’t mean– ”
But you were right.
2/35
I like to think I’m strong on ethics… So what you said was quite a challenge. It hit me where it hurts. Right on target.
A kill shot.
I’d like to talk about the enemies of humanity. The people who brought us to the state we’re in. The people who run our economy, own our corporations and control our media. The 0.1%.
“The 0.1%?”
Yes.
“Not the 1%?”
The 1% are disproportionately wealthy, disproportionately influential and disproportionately polluting, it’s true… But the 0.1%... They’re another ball game entirely.
“Taking Back Control!”
So what was that all about?
A few tycoons and Old Etonians getting more control over the rest of us?
Hedge funders escaping higher EU taxes?
Foreign corporations given the freedom to asset-strip the UK?
04 MAR 2019
Now the UK is flying solo, its companies have low valuations, becoming rich pickings for foreign owned vulture funds.
“For the average firm, Brexit is associated with a value loss of 16.4 per cent against a hypothetical no-Brexit scenario.”