I don’t suppose you’ve ever made a mistake?
“Why would you ask that?”
Because I’ve just made one.
“Ah, I see… And you don’t like making mistakes, do you?”
No.
“Want to tell me?”
No.
“Are you sure?”
I’m sure.
It’s…
It’s something you said.
You made me realise something.
“I’m sorry. I wouldn’t have intended–”
You said, “Is it ethical to have so many enemies? Is it ethical to see so many people as ‘enemies of the people’?”
“I said that–but that doesn’t mean– ”
But you were right.
2/35
I like to think I’m strong on ethics… So what you said was quite a challenge. It hit me where it hurts. Right on target.
A kill shot.
We were talking about the people who run our corporations, who control our economy – the engorged and greedy 0.1%. I said they were the enemies of humanity: Public Enemy No 1.
“But when you think about how many people you’re talking about...”
Yes, exactly.
There are 10s of 1000s of them. 100s of 1000s.
8 million, in fact.
0.1% of 8 billion, the population of the Earth.
So, 8 million enemies…
That can’t be ethical, can it?
“But isn’t what you told me true? The 0.1% do own most of everything, don’t they? They are the big polluters. They do hold the reins of power.”
Yes, all of that’s true, but there’s something else which is also true.
“Which is?”
They’re people – the 0.1%.
Just people.
6/35
And morality says you shouldn’t put labels on people. No group of people are ‘all the same’. Humans aren’t commodities sharing the same bar code. Individuality and non-identicality are part of what our identity is.
Any morality suited to the 21st Century, a world occupied by 8 billion humans, will tell you that you shouldn’t other others. It’s immoral. We’re all in the same boat, caught up in the same storm. We’re all just people.
There’s another problem with the ‘enemy’ thing - with defining the 0.1% as our enemies. A more practical, pragmatic problem – one that’s numerically the very opposite of the ethical issue.
You see, if I’m trying to zero in on the adversary our species faces, the enemy who’s
–jeopardising our survival
–endangering the biosphere
–destabilising the human world
then the 0.1% aren’t enough. There are too few of them. They’re too puny.
Even with the system they’ve established, the rules, the laws, the nation states, the police, how could the 0.1% maintain their position without our tacit consent?
There’s 999 of us to every 1 of them.
Every hierarchy in the world is an act of consent.
The 0.1% can’t sustain themselves just by themselves. It’s a ridiculous idea. At the very least, they’re sustained and enabled by the 1%.
There’s no gun to each of our heads. There are too few police or guards to police us all.
Something else compels our acquiescence, our participation in the hierarchies which enfold or oppress us.
You play with your fingers for a moment. I think you’re practicing an arpeggio. Then you say, “Ideas…”
I look at you blankly.
You repeat, “Ideas!”
Ideas?
“It’s not what’s pointed at our heads, it’s what’s in them…”
Have I ever told you that I love our conversations?
Have I said how I love just imagining your voice, the way you speak?
How much I look forward to our agreements, or to being challenged and questioned by you, to our complaints, our observations and our laughter?
18/35 #mistakes
Have I told you how I treasure the glint in your eye and the tilt of your chin?
“Stop now. You’re embarrassing me.”
I’ll stop. And you’re right.
The thing that binds us all together?
It’s the stuff inside our heads.
Ideas.
It’s ideas that convince the 1% to support & enable the 0.1%.
It’s ideas that convince the 5% to support & enable the 1%.
Ideas convince the 30% to enable the 5%.
& it’s ideas that make the rest of us think all of this is tolerable, acceptable or even the way it has to be.
20/35
Our civilisation is made up of ideas.
Ideas, stacked on upon the other.
Ideas, flooding through the human world.
If human civilisation has become self-damaging, rushing headlong towards ecological disaster, it’s because the ideas that sustain it have become outdated, dysfunctional or diseased.
Our society is under attack, it’s true.
We have an enemy, it’s true.
The evidence of this is all around us: the hatred on social media; the ruthless exploitation by our corporations; the destruction of the biological world.
But the enemy we face is not an elite, a conspiracy – or any group of people of one description or another.
It’s something bigger and more pervasive and more powerful.
“So, do you need to make a apology?”
I’m sorry – an apology?
“Yes. To the super-rich, to the 0.1% who you called our enemy, but who aren’t our enemy because they’re just people.”
Ah, yes… Yes, I do.
Dear Super-Rich,
Please accept my humble but heartfelt apology.
You, the 0.1%, are not Public Enemy No 1. That was a mistake I made.
You’re not ‘the enemies of humanity’. I was wrong about that, too.
Dear Super-Rich,
You’re not our enemy, after all.
You’re just infected with a thought plague: viral concepts and beliefs that have turned you into despicable human beings.
I’d like to talk about the enemies of humanity. The people who brought us to the state we’re in. The people who run our economy, own our corporations and control our media. The 0.1%.
“The 0.1%?”
Yes.
“Not the 1%?”
The 1% are disproportionately wealthy, disproportionately influential and disproportionately polluting, it’s true… But the 0.1%... They’re another ball game entirely.
“Taking Back Control!”
So what was that all about?
A few tycoons and Old Etonians getting more control over the rest of us?
Hedge funders escaping higher EU taxes?
Foreign corporations given the freedom to asset-strip the UK?
04 MAR 2019
Now the UK is flying solo, its companies have low valuations, becoming rich pickings for foreign owned vulture funds.
“For the average firm, Brexit is associated with a value loss of 16.4 per cent against a hypothetical no-Brexit scenario.”
Let’s talk about the economy.
You agree: “A logical next step.”
Would you mind if I’m blunt?
“Fire away.”
It’s shit.
“The economy?”
Yes.
“Well, that is blunt.”
You ponder for a moment, then ask, “Is this another of your enemies?”
The economy?
“Yes.”
An enemy to humanity and the biological world?
“Yes.”
I hope, by the time this thread is complete, you’ll tell me.
We’re talking about the supply-and-demand, producer/consumer, deregulated/lightly-touched, invisibly-handed, limited-resource-distributing, market-based economy that prevails across much of the world.
“And it’s all entirely shit?”
Well, perhaps I need to qualify that.
Anyone who calls a socialist an enemy of ordinary people is an enemy of ordinary people – because socialism is precisely about protecting ordinary people.
Greed?
What's there to say about greed?
There's something grubby about it.
There's something weak & pathetic about it.
It's almost servile; a kind of inner grovelling neediness.
You make yourself the saddle in which THINGS ride.
United Utilities has the hard job of transporting water from the Lake District to Manchester.
In the last 6 months it made monopoly profits of £292m.
In the last 5 years the boss took home £12m.
Is that greedy enough for you?
22 NOV 2019
Corporate greed:
Severn Trent made £285m in the last 6 months. The boss was paid a salary of £2.45m.
The 9 bosses of the water companies have been paid £58m over the past 5 years.
It all began with an ‘It’s just like flu’ shrug, a sprinkling of ‘I’ll shake hands with anyone’ braggadocio and an almost subliminal hint of mask aversion.