It is denied that Kalyan Bandhopadhyay forcefully entered CBI. He entered after obtaining requisite permission from CBI: Dr. Singhvi from Hakim's affidavit
There is no submission by the CBI that they could not produce any evidence. They in fact produced physical copy for chargesheet and they themselves had sought virtual hearing: Dr. Singhvi
Protests by certain leaders is no intention to impede process of law. Because someone is a high official does not mean that person will tamper with evidence. Then any accused minister can be arrested after 7 years without any ground: Dr. Singhvi
Dr. Singhvi continues reading out the affidavit claiming there was no event occurrence or concerned effort to intimidate or impeded judiciary by any Constitutional functionaries.
There was no obstruction to CBI officials entering special court. The hearing was held virtually with judge sitting in his chamber. There was no argument of obstruction addressed before special court. It was an afterthought: Dr. Singhvi from Firhad Hakim's affidavit
If for ends of justice this case is transferred to a relatively safer place where there is minimal chance of reaction by leaders and people, do you have objection and why not: Justice IP Mukerji
Singhvi says he will answer. This special court is truly special because all other special judges were functioning. Only this court as per CBI is vitiated: Dr. Singhvi.
Kolkata police has no received no complaints from CBI or CRPF as regards Nizam police. Kolkata police had provided unhindered access to and from CBI office: Dr. Singhvi
The photographs submitted were unverified and unauthenticated and do not prove any such claims that thousand of people were present in court but only showed media persons
However, same judgment says there can be exceptions and one such exception is by way of special statute when Governor will be 'persona designata': Dr. Singhvi
Now coming to our case. Your Lordships have heard of sprints. This is a lesson for CM not to swear themselves in first and then cabinet because some misguided soul will interpret it as Constitutional vacuum: Dr. Singhvi.
This interregnum between May 5 when @MamataOfficial was sworn in and cabinet was sworn in on May 10, there was a 1000 yard sprint to Raj Bhavan to get sanction when Council of Ministers and Speaker have not been sworn in yet: Dr. Singhvi
How is it even imaginable that you won't even go to Council of Ministers.
It is in such cases that High Courts have to step in. There is no law against such ingenuity which I call complete shallowness: Dr. Singhvi.
If sanction issue is granted, then arrest itself is void ab-initio: Bench
I am saying Mehta is raising only mobocracy issue. So then I can show him that they did not even have sanction. I am not saying this court should quash sanction: Dr. Singhvi
#BombayHighCourt is hearing the plea seeking door-to-door #COVIDVaccination for citizens above 75 years of age and those who are specially-abled or bed-ridden.
Adv Jamsheed Master submits on behalf of the petitioner, Yogeeta Vanzara, that in the state of Maharashtra, in places like Kolhapur plans till June 30 are published, in places like Gadchiroli and Nandurbar, weekly plans are published.
Master: My only prayer is that similar plans may be adopted by us. Having a plan helps people to plan their office leave, plan for their old parents. And in general it will save time.
#BombayHighCourt will continue hearing the plea seeking door-to-door #COVIDVaccination for citizens above 75 years of age and those who are specially-abled or bed-ridden tomorrow at 11 am.
The Court had on May 20 directed the National Expert Group on Vaccine Administration for COVID-19 (NEGVAC) to examine the feasibility of door to door COVID vaccination for elderly and disabled citizens.
AAG Dhyan Chinnappa mentions a memo filed for the release of seized vehicles during the lockdown on execution of personal bond in the entire state. (similar order was passed last year)
CJ: Was the amount increased in the second wave from Rs 1,500 because the second wave requires more stringent implementation?
A vacation bench had in the previous hearing recorded the statement made by the CBI that it will not act on letters asking the Maharashtra government to produce certain documents related to its investigation against Deshmukh.