2/Whole principle seems that measures to cut transmission occur after the outbreak.
A reactionary rather than proactive approach to infection.
Takes a minimalist approach
3/To prioritise education they want the minimum number of measures for the minimum amount of time.
"Lift as soon as evidence supports"
What evidence? Whose evidence?
The evidence is saying we should already have these measures in place!
4/ So the plan is,
Wait for an outbreak
Introduce minimal measures
(To reassure parents to keep sending their kids in)
Lift as soon as possible
Rinse and repeat
5/ Talk of collaboration, I notice Heads get no input.
6/ Testing could be brought back on site, acknowledging testing done at home is less reliable.
But considering FDA view on these LFDs this is more like covid theatre than a serious measure.
7/ Masks can be brought back but any decision around this must balance education vs transmission.
Ignores the fact that if we don't manage transmission the students won't be in school
8/Shielding could be reintroduced, but only by national government.
9/If things get really bad then they might even limit residential trips..
All these things are currently recommended by DfE as a third wave sweeps through schools
10/ Attendence could be limited, however it specified that certain year groups in certain setting would still be expected in, however this is designed to be used after an outbreak when multiple year groups are already isolating.
I bet this is never used
11/ These measures in the previous containment framework were never used.
Not in December as Alpha ripped through London and South East and threats of court action were made by DfE
Not in Jan before primary staff walked out on the 1st day back
14/ Also Delta can do something other Covid variants haven't.
It takes your cells and fuses them together into larger virus factories, makes it harder for antibodies to tackle
SAGE modelling released after the briefing shows gov have factored in large scale infection of the under 40s and lots of school disruption, so all that concern about loss of learning?
Where has that gone now thousands of students are being isolated?
I assume that's when the over 50s have been double dosed.
It also means schools will be about to break up, and although the gov pretends otherwise they know schools are acting as Delta hubs.
3/ Been saying for a while I think the government believes the quickest route to herd immunity with what they consider an acceptable death and health toll is
2 jab over 50s
1 jab 18-50s
Natural infection for under 18s
Its a gamble based on impatience and pandering to lobbyists
If we had an adequate media then everytime a minister was interviewed they'd be asked about when the government will finally invest in ventilation.
All the evidence says this is one of the most important measures.
2.Even skeptics are going to struggle to portray clean air as an attack on our freedoms, if anything we have a right to clean air.The impact of pollution on health and in particular on children is clear
Can anyone remember the last time a minister was asked about ventilation?
3. Can anyone ever remember a minister being asked about investing ventilation in the whole pandemic?
UK government's total failure to address this is stark
So is the failure of the media to hold the gov to account for this glaring hole in their Covid strategy.
Reading back through my original thread when they announced mass testing, I got sent the link to the Heads test and trace briefing on last day of term, only around 500 attended, most were probably too busy notifying close contacts.