112. French Interview with @BricePerrier
defending the early research of #DRASTIC (5.30 onwards) francais.rt.com/magazines/inte…
"Quand on me demande au début si c'est Biden qui a fait changer le sens du vent, je réponds : ça serait plutôt Drastic!"
117. The UK Sun - Hall of Shame!
They borrowed Sharri's WIV bat video story but failed to mention #DRASTIC thesun.co.uk/news/15270924/…
I blame Henry Holloway
"It was handed to the TV station by a group called 'Drastic', who claim to be a team of scientists and investigators 🤔 though most of the group operate under pseudonyms"
1. Bai Yunyi (Global Times) 2. Lü Xiang ( CASS) 3. Li Haidong (Institute of International Relations of CFAU) 4. Shu Hongshui ( Northwest University of Political Science and Law)
Report says there's 'ample evidence' that proves the Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists were working to modify coronaviruses to infect humans. Republicans call for bipartisan probe.
"The documents were released by Drastic, the web-based investigations team set up by scientists from across the world to look into the origins of Covid-19."
"We are able to tell you about a very important document discovered by #DRASTIC that sheds new light on the research activities that US researchers from EHA wanted to carry out in collaboration with the WIV Labs"
164. Presa Diretta got a response from DARPA denying everything, but that doesn't quite explain away Jonathan Epstein's Email about DURC and DARPA concerns sent to Baric.
Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and "batified" mice, and much, much more.
"Wuhan scientists planned to release enhanced coronaviruses into bat caves 21 months before start of Covid pandemic outbreak - but DARPA refused to fund project over fears it would backfire"
Newly revealed documents purport to show grant proposals to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles containing novel chimeric spike proteins of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan
"The DRASTIC group, founded by scientists investigating the origins of the Covid-19 epidemic from around the world, announced that Chinese scientists were offered a grant to release coronaviruses to bats"
Des documents divulgués montrent que la DARPA a envisagé de financer un projet de 14 millions de dollars pour infecter les chauves-souris chinoises avec des coronavirus altérés en 2018 – rapports –
"Scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology planned to alter coronaviruses to infect humans more easily by introducing “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses"
Leaked DARPA docs reveal plans for risky research
Plan included work on humanized & 'batified' mice, adding furin cleavage sites, & 'vaccinating' wild bats
This is GOF research via experimental adaptation increasing pathogenicity which is DURC because it involves a listed high-risk pathogen and increases virulence via serial passage in a key reservoir host. i.e. DUCKS!
The Jiangsu researchers deliberately turned a relatively mild H5N6 avian influenza virus into a highly lethal killer of ducks through repeated serial passage in duck cells and live mallard ducks.
3. Good opportunity to boost my Video from 2013!
What originally caused zero deaths in mallards was rapidly adapted into a strain causing up to 100% mortality, massive viral replication in organs, and severe disease..
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University
“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)
“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.