Some ahistorical dumbass is going to read this and say "well what about kings?"
You didn't pledge loyalty directly to the king (unless you were important, like nobility.) You pledged to your local Baron; he pledged to the king or to a Duke, who then pledged to the king.
"By the Lord before whom this sanctuary is holy, I will to (lord) be true and faithful, loving that which he loves and shunning that which he shuns, according to the laws of God and the order of the world."
Note: oaths of fealty could not be used to make you commit atrocities.
This is also the origin of religious exemptions from military service and modern conscientious objection. It was literally baked into the Anglo-Saxon loyalty oath.
"Nor will I ever by will or action, word or deed, do anything unpleasing to him, on condition that he will hold to me as I deserve it, and he will perform everything as it was on our agreement when I submitted myself to him and chose his will."
It's a contract.
Acceptance:
"Henry, king of England, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, count of Anjou, to all liegemen, English, Normans, Welsh, and Scots... Know ye that We have received (vassal) into our grace and favor;
"Wherefore: whosoever within the bounds of Our territories shall be willing to give him aid, [as our vassal, in recovering his territories*,] let him be assured of our favor and license on that behalf."
*This part is specific to the terms of vassalage discussed.
Again: the Oath follows a set format, but it's meant to include specific terms just like a contract, and if the lord fails to perform he is not owed loyalty.
In the Acceptance above King Henry is assuring his new vassal he won't forget the terms they agreed to.
Getting back to the initial point: the very idea of giving loyalty to a leader whom you had never met and had a discussion with about the nature of your loyalty and your expectations of leadership would have been silly to the ancestors.
So Ramit is now arguing with the @B_REInvest@capital_sb crowd about accredited investor status not being worth anything?
I get that he has a book he wants to sell, but man... Talk about taking advantage of the common man's confusion on #investment.
Let me break this down for people.
Accredited investor status is basically "I'm a millionaire, so let me invest in seed round/pre IPO companies like a big boy, with minimal paperwork*."
*You can also qualify by making six figures a year; the exact amount is on the SEC website.
@capital_sb said, IF you have a network, accredited investor status can help get you in to really lucrative investments.
This is 100% true. SEC compliance is a pain in the ass. People are not looking to deal with it, and the easy button is "only deal with accredited investors."
Someone tweeted about #dating and reminded me of an utterly weird experience I had several years ago.
I talked to someone who just... didn't make sense.
I would say "give me the confidence of a first year med student who doesn't think anything exists if they can't picture it in their minds" but this was "break from reality" levels of confusion.
Honestly this is why a lot of people screw up #dating.
You think you know what you want and have an idea of how to attain it, but at 22, without any world experience, you are likely to have a mashup of your parents' hopes and the esoteric lore you cribbed from "Sex in the City."
The @eigenrobot threadwar about a Chinese girl in Germany saying she's German and Americans who are 1/32 German are not is dumb.
Almost everyone is making comments that make sense to them but they have different ideas of "German."
1. The OP
If you're Chinese and grew up in Germany then when you encounter other Chinese they're consistently going to react with "wow, you're really European!"
So of course, relative to the baseline of an ethnic Han growing up in Shanghai, she thinks "I'm German."
2. The angry respondent
"Magic dirt isn't real" was his shorthand.
If you've read any Evola you know his theory is that race is not mere genetics and it is not simply culture either but some ineluctable property that persists beyond the sterile scientific analysis of the two.
Lichtenstein was extremely responsive to the needs of international corporations and presumably would have been eager to have a world reserve currency if it were not running on Swiss francs. But it had no capacity to do so.
"This is silly," you might say. "Lichtenstein is a tiny microstate, not even in the running!"
Ok. Apply this to someone bigger.
Did 1970s China have the capacity to function as administrator of a world reserve currency, in the manner described above?