#UttarakhandHighCourt: At least Mr. Negi was honest enough to tell us that out of 8 ventilators at Rudraprayag, 6 are not working.
That sense of honestly is lacking here.
Court: Similar SOP was issued for #Kumbh Mela. Then what happened?
Photos and videos at Kumbh showed that #Covid19 protocols like social distancing and masking were not being followed.
Dr. Chauhan: We will do our best to ensure safety.
Court: What happens if you fail? If people die due to the #CharDhamYatra would the government take on the burden of compensating families where there are deaths.
Kindly read this morning’s TOI, scientists are saying watch out for four more emerging variants says the #UttarakhandHighCourt
When other countries have started taking necessary steps to avoid the third wave, why is the State of Uttarakhand asking for another catastrophe, asks the #HighCourt.
Uttarakhand High Court: Especially after the State has been the centre of two catastrophes- with the #Kumbh and the #GangaDarshan.
So many failures of the government to implement SOPs, how do we know that the #CharDham is not going to be a failure?
Dr. Chauhan: Everyone will need to carry a negative RTPCR.
Court: Have you forgotten the fake RTPCR tests at the #Kumbh?
Court: Religious faith cannot be allowed to override public safety.
AG: I wish to ask if using of more cameras in these areas may adversely affect security because Chaar Dhaam is very close to borders.
AG: I wish to ask if using of more cameras in these areas may adversely affect security because Chaar Dhaam is very close to borders.
Court: We must protect all Char Dhaams from attack. Please consult with the security forces.
I presume our State has already secured the Chaar Dhaams even in normal circumstances.
“It is the interest of the public to stay the operation of cabinet decision dated 25 June and to direct the government not to permit pilgrims to reach the #CharDham temples." #UttarakhandHighCourt
“The Government must be honest with the Court. It has purposely tried to mislead the Court with its data. The High Court cannot be taken lightly by the Government. You can be hauled up for perjury,” the Court said.
4. Since our ancestors were unaware of the development of a technology that would permit live streaming, the possibility of our Shastras prohibiting
live streaming of a religious ceremony is absolutely impossible.
The Supreme Court had on June 25 set aside the High Court order of June 9 refusing to take on record affidavits filed by @GhatakMoloy and @MamataOfficial
The court has remanded that issue back to HC to consider afresh.
The Court will also hear application filed by #SonuSood seeking intervention on the ground that the orders being passed in the PILs may affect him and hence he is necessary party.
#MadrasHighCourt issues notice in plea moved by State BJP general secretary, Karu Nagarajan challenging 9-member committee formed by TN govt to study impact of NEET on students from socially backward classes. State to file counter in a week
In interim order, HC noted petitioner's submission that in light of #SupremeCourt's Aug 2017 Judgment on #NEET, there is little room for State to set up committee to ascertain if NEET-based admission process has prejudicially affected socially backward students
Justice DY Chandrachud led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear plea by Kerala Govt seeking permission to withdraw cases against prominent CPI(M) leaders for vandalism in the Kerala Assembly in 2015 when the current ruling party in the State was in opposition @vijayanpinarayi
Plea is against a March 12, 2021 order of the Kerala High Court which had dismissed the State's petition against an order of rejection by the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court seeking permission to withdraw prosecution against accused including sitting ministers.
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea against the dismissal of a petition by the NGT which raised issues of anthropogenic pressures and over-exploitation of the Sambhar Lake which led to the mass death of over
18,000 migratory birds in the Sambhar Lake in November, 2019
NGT had dismissed the plea stating it was similar to a suo motu case the tribunal was hearing. However, the plea in #supremecourt contends that the case is different.
Plea highlights violation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, 1971, to which India is a signatory. The said enactment mandates ‘wise’ use of wetlands and special protection of Wetlands that have been designated as a ‘Ramsar’ site #supremecourt