Supreme Court hears an appeal against a Calcutta High Court order which dismissed a PIL that had sought the accused in Narada scam to act as per rule of law since they created “mobocracy.” #supremcourt#PIL
Justice Vineet Saran: You are misusing the forum of this court for a public interest litigation. The High Court has done a favour by not imposing cost on you. What is your locus
Justice Dinesh Maheshwari: If it is a PIL then everyone who wants to come here should be allowed? If the answer is no, then we find parties here are regularly appearing in this case before the high court. How do you enter the fray?
#supremecourt: Since the petitioner is withdrawing it, we are not imposing any costs, thus we are only dismissing it
Adv Viplav Sharma: Highly obliged
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Covid 19] Allahabad High Court to hear the suo moto COVID 19 matter shortly.
Earlier, the court had directed the government to inform the court about the steps being taken to upgrade the primary and secondary health care centers.
Manish Goyal, AAG: We were directed to file the status report about future planning and steps to tackle the pandemic. We have filed an affidavit in this regard.
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking direction to Twitter India to appoint Resident Grievance Officer under IT Rules, 2021. On last date of hearing, Court had asked the social media platform when it would appoint such an officer
#BombayHighCourt is hearing two petitions assailing the Information Technology (Guidelines for intermediaries and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.
Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
Sr Adv Darius Khambatta for one of the petitioners, which is a digital news portal, states there are amendments which are required to be carried out in that petition.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a plea challenging the provisions dealing with restitution of conjugal rights since "court-mandated restitution of conjugal rights amounts to a "coercive act" on part of the state." #supremecourt#conjugalrights
The plea states that such a direction for restitution of conjugal rights is an infringement of one's sexual & decisional autonomy, right to privacy & dignity, and thus a violation of the right to life under Article 21 #supremecourt
Plea seeks Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act to be struck down. Additionally, the enforcement of restitution of conjugal rights as provided for under Order XXI Rule 32 and 33 of the CPC is also sought to be struck down
Ghaziabad Video: Karnataka HC to shortly begin hearing a plea filed by Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Ltd challenging notice issued under Section 41A of CrPC.