@vmanancourt Reminder: the underlying issues haven’t really changed since 2015 — when the previous “Safe Harbor” agreement was similarly struck down nyti.ms/3eoZx7G
Ever since Joe Biden became president, there’s been a push to get a new deal done — a clear example of rebuilding transatlantic ties politi.co/3u0625Z
The US president even tried to wade in to reach a political agreement after negotiations stalled. The result? That push failed, albeit both sides have redoubled their efforts to reach some sort of agreement by the end of the year politi.co/3eqMK4r
So where does that leave us? Pretty much stuck.
The underlying issues of US national security access to EU data have not been resolved. Also complicating things: US officials raising the ghost of China to scare everyone into doing something politi.co/3khSMZ7
End note: looking through my past clips, I’m realizing that I’ve been doing this stuff for a long, long time.
I’m onto my third Commerce Secretary, although @VeraJourova is still hanging around!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For everyone wading into the global tax overhaul as G7 ministers meet today — hi, welcome, glad you could make it.
Let’s break down where we are, what are the sticking points, and what may — and may not — be accounced in coming days.
<cue thread>>
OK, first things, first. This is not about tax. At its core are unanswered questions over which govts have the right to tell large (digital) companies what they can and can not do within their jurisdictions.
In short, it's a power play (but I would say that, as a POLITICO hack)
Countries like France & Italy see the likes of @Facebook & @Google making lots of ad revenue within their countries and legitimately question: why is that cash going to Ireland/US and not staying with us? How's that fair?
In a couple of hours (9am EST), we'll know if Donald Trump is allowed back on @Facebook. It represents a watershed moment of online content rules -- and shines a spotlight on how FB has de facto power over much of our lives.
A thread on what to expect and this ruling means:
So let's do the basics: Trump's account was suspended after Jan 6 riots and FB referred that decision to @OversightBoard in late Jan to determine if that was correct decision or not oversightboard.com/news/175638774…
As w/ everything that FB does, it divided opinion. The US right called it censorship, the US left called it about time. The rest of the world said what about us amid similar posts from other global leaders
I teamed up w/ academic to see if banned #COVID19 disinformation videos like Plandemic were still widely available on the mainstream social networks. Short answer: 100%
Over 8-month period, these banned videos racked up 600k of @Facebook engagements even though they were banned
How did that happen? Well, these videos were uploaded to fringe sites like BitChute (a YouTube rival), then those videos were shared widely on FB w/o getting flagged. FB took down many of these banned videos when I told them about issue. But still, not a good look, imho
Let's call it the "replatforming" problem. You can ban as many videos/posts as you like. But whatever you do, ppl will find ways around those checks. Case in point: this version of #Plandemic is still on FB (via BitChute) 👇