Most of our misunderstandings come from semantics, using absolute binaries, without subtleties, for complex problem. Saying, e.g., just vaccines 'protect', with no additional explanations, suggests 100%, which is as unscientific as anti-vaxxer saying they don't work at all.
1/
Those kind of positions are confrontational & destroy trust. When someone only says 'protect', I ask yes but HOW MUCH, AGAINST WHAT & HOW LONG? When someone says 'see, they don't work', I say they DO this much, against this & this long. I think that's how you build trust.
2/
Hopefully, data will soon clarify current confusions, as there are more & more fantastic studies.
I would say, correct me if I'm wrong, that Abs are still our best correlate for protection. There are likely better ones, but we can't yet qualify or quantify them.
3/
Based only on that, I still say the more Abs, the better the vaccine. But Abs obviously wane as they are supposed to; after 6 months, drop-off is significant enough to open a window of possibility for reinfection or breakthrough. Thus, boosters are necessary if NPIs abolished.
4/
On the other side, #SARSCoV2 variants improved transmission, binding, replication and/or Abs evasion. It resulted in #Delta having a 1000 times higher viral load than the original. VOCs transmission & binding are also better at lower than higher temperature (humidity unknown).
5/
Next, studies proved that for clearing upper airways we need higher Abs levels than for lower airways.
Also, kids are better at clearing the virus than adults thanks to greater & fresher innate immune memory in nasal mucosa (adaptive memory vs. #SARS2 is still under debate).
6/
Why is then difficult to accept that if our diminishing protective army is confronted in the nose with increased numbers of the now disguised enemy, it might lead to reinfection or breakthrough?
If the fight continues, with time #SARS2 might even break to lower airways again.
7/
So, when someone asks me, I give long answers. Vaccines certainly help & are absolutely needed as they are our best weapon. They offer some, but when excessively confronted with #Delta variant not much protection vs. infection, and just a little more vs. symptomatic #COVID.
8/
If vaccinated get infected (test positive with or without symptoms), they most likely have less but more than enough viral load to transmit the virus to other vaccinated or not. Thus, they still need to carry masks indoors to protect themselves & limit the spread to others.
9/
Repeated infections may boost immunity but are undesirable because each can do harm. For example, it seems vaccines can't protect against anosmia, which is a pathway to the brain. Also, 19% of breakthrough infections reported #LongCovid symptoms.
10/
Vaccines offer much better, often life-saving protection vs. hospitalizations, severe #COVID & death. But, as Abs wane, it's unknown if & how long that will last. Thus, boosters are needed starting with the oldest & most frail again; until we find a longer-lasting solution.
11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another great #Delta study from #Singapore. Thanks to @graemeblake for pointing it out to me.
"PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were similar between both vaccinated & unvaccinated groups at diagnosis, but viral loads decreased faster in vaccinated..."
Ct>30 almost a week earlier!
"Early, robust boosting of anti spike protein antibodies was observed in vaccinated patients, however, these titers were significantly lower against B.1.617.2 as compared with the wildtype vaccine strain." medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Outcomes significantly attenuated!
"Vaccine-breakthrough patients were significantly more likely to be asymptomatic (28% vs. 9%) & if symptomatic, had fewer number of symptoms."
-> 53% of unvaccinated had pneumonia compared to only 21% of breakthroughs.
-> 20% vs. 2% required O2.
"It is highly likely that vaccine induced immunity to #SARSCoV2 infection & potentially severe disease (but probably to a lesser extent) will wane over time," according to a document considered by the government's SAGE. reuters.com/world/uk/covid…
"It is therefore likely that there will be vaccination campaigns against #SARSCoV2 for many years to come, but currently we do not know what will be the optimal required frequency for re-vaccination to protect the vulnerable from COVID disease."
This is what I wrote before the vaccinations started, why this is going to be a bigger challange than the flu.
"...without SARS-COV-2 eradicated, outbreaks will happen in different corners of the world for a whole year without a predictable pattern... diaryofamacrodaytrader.substack.com/p/9-current-sa…
Since we are going to talk more & more about innate & adaptive immune memory, what #SARSCoV2 does to them, how it fools or beats them & what vaccines can or can't do about it, here is a pre-pandemic 2019 paper about innate & adaptive immune memory. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Since the beginnings of the pandemic, my gut feeling hypothesis was that #SARS2 can fool the innate immune system and haywire & wear out the adaptive immune system. Thus, our aging makes it more dangerous with time & reinfections would only accumulate of the damage.
Among other fascinating properties, that was the reason in my newsletter I called it a potential civilization killer & the virus from the future.
I lacked the expertise to prove it but my working assumption was to avoid it as much as we can. There is no good in #SARS2 infection.
Embarrassing. In 2 months Fauci & CDC went from the vaccinated don't need masks they can't spread the virus to vaccinated have the same amount of virus in the nasopharynx as the unvaccinated. They should install Twitter & follow 20 accounts to know what's going on in the world.
In the last couple of months there were several studies showing 40% lower viral load in vaccinated than the unvaccinated participants. While vaccine cheerleaders celebrated this data, since that was all pre-Delta, my reaction was:
While @CDCDirector is surprised now by their new unpublished data showing that virus can thrive in the airways of vaccinated, there were studies made months before (in addition to common logic & basic knowledge).
The endemicity being forced on us is founded on a belief that the severity of #SARSCoV2 is due to novelty: once our immune system gets familiar with the virus, it will become benign, just like the other four "common cold" human coronaviruses (hCoVs). 1/
The linear progression of #COVID severity with age is explained by kids being freshly exposed to endemic hCoVs. That's, supposedly, why kids have mild #COVID outcomes, just like how hCoVs are now harmless for adults: they just aren't novel anymore. 2/
This thinking denies any special CONSTELLATION of properties of #SARSCoV2 (variants, ACE2 binding, wide viral tropism, syncytia, anosmia, brain infiltration...). Once we all get exposed to it several times by natural infection and/or vaccination, the pandemic will stop.
3/
"Vaccine’s efficacy in preventing any Covid-19 infection that causes even minor symptoms appeared to decline by an average of 6% every 2 months after administration. It peaked at more than 96% within 2 months of vaccination & slipped to 84% after 6 months" statnews.com/2021/07/28/eff…
"...from 2 months to <4 months, VE was 90.1% & from 4 months to the data cut-off, VE was 83.7%."
"...through the data CUT-OFF (MARCH 13, 2021)."
"The current report provides updated efficacy analyses conducted on cases accrued up to March 13, 2021."
They noticed waning pre-Delta!
Previous was a study of the safety & efficacy up to 6 months post-2nd dose (also included vs. Beta, but there was no Delta then).
This next is info related to the effect from the 3rd booster shot from the Pfizer's 2nd quarter earnings call.
HT @JJulhes!