🚨Interim results of @TogetherTrial of ivermectin and fluvoxamine for early treatment of #COVID_19 🚨
#ivermectin : no significant effect
#fluvoxamine: ↘️ risk of hospitalization by 31%
These important results deserve a🧵 1/n rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/news/august-6-…
Trial took place in 10 sites in Minas Gerais, 🇧🇷. 2/n
Patients with early #COVID_19 (e.g. <7days after onset of symptoms) and at least one risk factor were enrolled. 3/n
The main measured outcome was the risk of hospitalisation. 4/n
#Ivermectin (0.4mg/kg for three days) was not found to have any effect.
Very high number of enrolled patients. N = 1,355 total. No statistically significant effect on risk of hospitalisation or mortality. 5/n
#Fluvoxamine (200mg/day for ten days) was found to reduce risk of hospitalisation by 31% (RR 0.69 [0.52;0.91].
Very high number of enrolled patients. N = 1,480 total. 6/n
Here are the results of fluvoxamine on mortality. Not statistically significant, but the trial was not powered to detect an effect on mortality. 7/n
What next?
First, it is important to continue investigating why fluvoxamine would work... 8/n
Fluvoxamine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. At least 3 putative MoAs:
▶️antiplatelet (depletes platelet serotonin)
▶️anti-inflammatory (sigma1 receptor agonist)
▶️antiviral (inhibits virus entry into cells through 'FIASMA' effect) 9/n pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33959018/
Secondly, although fluvoxamine is a cheap generic drug, access in LMICs may be challenging (i.e. not on WHO Essential Medicines List). There is a need to evaluate more accessible drugs with similar characteristics.
#Fluoxetine is the best candidate. 10/n
Thirdly, now is the time for combinations. Investigators of the Together Trial recommend to assess effectiveness of fluvoxamine (or fluoxetine) + inhaled budesonide for early treatment of COVID-19. 11/n
Fourthly, and most importantly, decision-makers and regulators will need to decide if fluvoxamine should now receive emergency use approval for early treatment of COVID-19 in countries with low vaccination rates and raging epidemic waves. In which patients? 12/n
Finally, kudos👏👏👏 to all those who have relentlessly argued that #fluvoxamine was a promising candidate for #COVID_19. These include @AngelaReiersen, @EricLenze2, @boulware_dr, @HoertelN, @farid__jalali & the late @__ice9. 13/END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julien Potet

Julien Potet Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julienpotet

6 May
While the decision of the 🇺🇸 governement to support an IP #waiver on #COVID_19 vaccines is a step in the right direction, many other things now need to happen. 🧵1/9
For the waiver to effectively accelerate vaccine availability, significant 💰 investments are needed, as well as "tech transfers". 2/9
Tech transfers require both parties, originator vaccine companies and recipient vaccine companies, to *collaborate* and share know how. science.sciencemag.org/content/369/65…
If the originator vaccine company is reluctant to collaborate, the IP waiver alone will have v/ limited impact. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
11 Mar
1/
🔥EXCELLENT results for Phase III multicentric double-blind RCT of #proxalutamide for hospitalized #COVID_19 patients🔥
n=588
Study led by @FlavioCadegiani in 🇧🇷
92% reduction in mortality ! prnewswire.com/news-releases/…
2/
Keep in mind that this is a press release, not a scientific publication.
A point is particularly unclear in the press release, i.e. authors claim 588 patients were enrolled, but then later write they were 294 in proxalutamide group & 296 in control group.
294+296=590≠588.
3/
Detailed results were shared in Portuguese during this press conference in 🇧🇷
Read 8 tweets
10 Mar
1/
Excellent results for phase 3 placebo-controlled RCT in 🇺🇸 among mild-to-moderate #COVID_19 patients at high risk of clinical deterioration.
Cocktail of 700mg of #bamlanivimab & 1,400mg of #etesevimab reduced risk of hospitalizations & death by 87%.
2/
This press release needs to be taken with grain of salt. Among other limitations, it says nothing about different variants of concern.
3/
Concern now is that bamlanivimab is quite accessible in monotherapy, but not yet in combination w/ etesevimab.
In Oct 2020, @gatesfoundation signed a contract w/ Lilly & Fujifilm to manufacture more bamlanivimab. Could it now also include etesevimab?
Read 6 tweets
12 Feb
1/
Large RCT (n=930) in Barcelona, 🇪🇸: #calcifediol vs control among hospitalized #COVID_19 patients.
Strong clinical benefit: ↘️ICU admission & ↘️mortality.
Unclear to me why this preprint got unnoticed (published three weeks ago) !
#VitaminD
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2/
These new results confirm similar positive results for calcifediol generated in Cordoba in a smaller pilot RCT
3/
The new study in Barcelona has limitations: no placebo (open label); randomization per ward (not individual); modified intention to treat for some patients.
Yet results are very encouraging !
It was apparently submitted to @TheLancet. I hope it will get published soon.
Read 6 tweets
11 Feb
Live-tweeting about the 1st online conference on noma disease. Stay tune !
#ZeroNoma #NTDs
Opening message by @PeterHotez. Peter is among other things editor of @PLOSNTDs. The journal recently agreed to include noma in the list of eligible diseases for publication. #NTDs
Noma survivor @FidelStrub tells his personal story. Underwent 27 surgical operations ! Moving testimony by a strong advocate !
Read 18 tweets
6 Feb
Quelques éléments de contexte pour expliquer le communiqué de presse de @Merck qui conclut à l'absence quasi totale de preuves en faveur de l'#ivermectine (IVM) pour #COVID_19 🧵merck.com/news/merck-sta…
Petit disclaimer pour commencer : je ne suis ni "pro-IVM", ni "anti-IVM". Ces catégories n'existent que dans les esprits des gens qui politisent tout et n'importe quoi.
Je ne doute pas que Merck croit sincèrement que l'IVM ne marchera pas contre COVID-19.
Ceci étant, il faut analyser le contexte dans lequel s'inscrit cette prise de position assez catégorique et pour le moins inhabituelle d'un géant de l'industrie.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(