1/ TODAY @AvantiBT CONFIRMED A REPORT in today's @WSJ that it filed an application to become a Federal Reserve member bank. 💪 Here are links to Avanti's statement & the WSJ story:
wsj.com/articles/crypt…

avantibank.com/press/avanti-s…
2/ This means @AvantiBT formally submitted to what it had already informally accepted--namely, the very same regulatory capital, compliance and supervisory examination standards that apply to traditional banks.
3/ It also means @AvantiBT is seeking federal supervision directly by the Fed itself (in addition to Avanti's existing regulator, #Wyoming Division of Banking). Avanti's Fed membership application is distinct from its prior application for payment system access (filed Oct 2020).
4/ In other words, @AvantiBT is the first digital asset bank to seek regulation by the Fed itself. Given everything happening in DC with #crypto regulation, this is important. There's a bigger story to tell, but out of respect for the process I won't say more at this juncture.
5/ Ironically, the bank industry's lobbyists keep saying #crypto needs to be subject to higher standards than traditional banks. But their own banks are now getting into crypto too, and so it's really funny to watch the bank lobbyists tie themselves in knots.😂
6/ And, even funnier--my pals at various banks keep calling to ask for my help with #crypto, while at the very same time their own lobbyists are attacking us with falsehoods & trying to slow down our regulatory process. Hypocrisy much??!!🤪🤦‍♀️
7/ Last, here's an interesting exchange re: today's @WSJ article. I learned something from this tweet.🤔



Stay tuned for news about @AvantiBT--no updates on launch date yet given all of these machinations, but everyone is hard at work!🤠

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Long 🔑

Caitlin Long 🔑 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CaitlinLong_

5 Sep
1/ @NYtimes story on #crypto/#banking deserves a thoughtful reply. Issue isn't black & white: anti-crypto forces try to paint us all w/ a broad brush. Bad actors deserve to be called out, but the article ignores fact that regulatory-compliant firms exist. nytimes.com/2021/09/05/us/…
2/ First--@ericliptonnyt/@el72champs you got a fact wrong & it deserves a correction. #Wyoming’s special bank charter doesn't allow “cryptocurrency deposits.” “Deposit” has a v specific meaning in banking: banks can only take deposits in fiat money (US$)--not in crypto. Pls fix.
3/ That’s a key distinction. Regulated banks can provide CUSTODY services for #crypto (like for securities) but CAN’T take deposits in ANYTHING except money. Article misses that critical point--it’s a firewall protecting Fed's payment system from exposure to anything other than $
Read 24 tweets
20 Jul
1/ ~FIVE YEARS AGO, I first said #bitcoin cld take down a GSIB (global systemically important bank)--NOT because of anything wrong w/ Bitcoin, but bc the banks just aren't set up to handle an asset that settles in minutes & is irreversible. @ChrisBrummerDr rollcall.com/podcasts/finte…
2/ If banks are going to start owning #bitcoin/#crypto on their books(ie, not just being custodians like w/ stocks), banks need special rules to deal w/ the huge differences in settlement terms. Banks use systems set up ~40yrs ago (esp in US),most of which reconcile only 1x/day😱
3/ Again-issue is w/ banks' IT & operational systems, not w/ #Bitcoin (which I consider the most significant financial technology invention of human history. Yep, really💪). In this @ChrisBrummerDr podcast w/ former Fed Governor Dan Tarullo, we discuss how bank capital rules work
Read 8 tweets
13 Jul
1/ THREAD ABT REGULATORY NEWS in #crypto, which I’ve been chronicling on twitter since April. Seems crackdown has begun. I dunno how it'll turn out but:
* it won't impact #BTC #ETH etc directly. Base layers will keep addin' blocks
* it'll impact intermediaries & US$ access points
2/ Today was a key event that few in #crypto were probably watching, but it REALLY matters: the comment period ended for the Fed’s proposed payment system access guidelines. See comment letters here (including @AvantiBT’s 18-page tome--awaiting upload): federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/View…
3/ Why does it matter? Fed guidelines are partly aimed at #crypto (despite not mentioning crypto even once). Given what’s happening w/ US$ #stablecoins, the guidelines are esp relevant (see WSJ story last wk-FSOC wants Fed to regulate stablecoins per “ppl familiar w/discussion”)
Read 24 tweets
29 Jun
1/ ANOTHER STABLECOIN SPEECH by ex-BOE/BOC head Mark Carney--he was surprisingly direct:
* #stablecoins shld have access to central bank's balance sheet;
* "existing bank-based payment rails are expensive, even if those costs aren't visible to consumers"
bis.org/events/acrocke…
2/
* "banks are a means to an end, not ends in themselves, & they'll have to adapt to a much more competitive environment" [WOW, SPICY]

* "any systemic pymt system must be overseen by a central bank & have final settlement option in public money"
3/
* "regulatory model for #stablecoins must offer equivalent protections to commercial bank money" to include:
-legal claim paid in fiat upon demand
-capital rqmts
-liquidity rqmts
-central bank access terms
-backstop if failure
Read 5 tweets
25 Jun
1/ IT MAY SURPRISE YOU that, as a #bitcoiner, I think @BIS_org's proposed 1:1 capital rqmnt for #bitcoin is TOO LOW & view banks entering bitcoin trading as bad for banks & bitcoin's price volatility. The problem isn't Bitcoin--it's the banks.@ForbesCrypto
forbes.com/sites/caitlinl…
2/ @BIS_org's capital proposal completely missed biggest issue w/ banks holding #bitcoin on-balance sheet: settlement risk. Traditional banks are simply not set up operationally or technologically to hold on-balance sheet assets that settle in minutes w/ irreversibility.
3/ Many spoke out that the 1:1 capital rqmt was too high. But the opposite is true. The Basel III framework isn't set up to assess settlement risk. It doesn't have to, bc there are all kinds of operational fault tolerance mechanisms built into traditional financial markets.
Read 18 tweets
18 Jun
1/ NOT MUCH HAS BEEN WRITTEN yet abt this #stablecoin paper by @bankofengland June 7. I'm just getting to it. Big deal.🧐"HMT propose to bring systemic #stablecoins into BOE's regulatory remit, in line w/ its responsibilities for systemic payments systems"
bankofengland.co.uk/paper/2021/new…
2/ Yep, I've warned this is an issue central bankers have w/ #stablecoins issued by non-banks:

"A large-scale displacement of commercial bank money by new forms of digital money cld mean a higher fraction of money in economy backed by high-quality liquid assets (HQLA)."
3/ "Commercial banks would have to adapt their balance sheets in response to deposits leaving the banking system...the Bank may wish to limit migration, so financial system could adjust to the presence of new forms of digital money in an orderly fashion." Oh boy, BOE went there.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(