1/ THREAD ABT REGULATORY NEWS in #crypto, which I’ve been chronicling on twitter since April. Seems crackdown has begun. I dunno how it'll turn out but:
* it won't impact #BTC #ETH etc directly. Base layers will keep addin' blocks
* it'll impact intermediaries & US$ access points
2/ Today was a key event that few in #crypto were probably watching, but it REALLY matters: the comment period ended for the Fed’s proposed payment system access guidelines. See comment letters here (including @AvantiBT’s 18-page tome--awaiting upload): federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/View…
3/ Why does it matter? Fed guidelines are partly aimed at #crypto (despite not mentioning crypto even once). Given what’s happening w/ US$ #stablecoins, the guidelines are esp relevant (see WSJ story last wk-FSOC wants Fed to regulate stablecoins per “ppl familiar w/discussion”)
4/ So what are the guidelines? They set principles for depository institutions to be able to access the Fed & its US$ services directly.

**I'VE BEEN WORKING TO OPEN UP DIRECT ACCESS FOR OUR INDUSTRY SINCE 2018.**

Yep, playing the long game.🤠
5/ Why does such direct Fed payment system access matter? Let’s go back to first principles. Many start-ups in our industry were de-banked in Fall 2017 when banks did mass closures of bank accts connected to #crypto. Didn’t matter whether biz was legit or scam--all were de-banked
6/ Media often disparage our industry over “cat & mouse chase” for bank accts but EVERYONE in our industry faced it. Sadly,having durable bank relationships was often THE deciding factor for whether a start-up made it. A trade assn that only touched US$,not #crypto,faced it too🤦‍♀️
7/ As I’ve said many times, our industry wouldn’t have the success we do if Silvergate & Signature hadn’t stuck with us then, likely incurring higher regulatory costs for doing so. But de-banking is still a risk today--even @coinbase listed it as a risk in its IPO prospectus.
8/ And our industry is growing fast--it needs LOTS of US$ deposit capacity. It’s impt for our industry that law-abiding companies can gain direct US$ access on our own. It’s not just about cutting out layers of fees that many in our industry are incurring just to get US$ access.
9/ It’s also abt being responsible to keep our own banking access, not being at whim of a faceless manager somewhere. While most fintechs don’t need to worry abt being de-banked, memories of 2017 still cause EVERY #crypto co to diversify w/ multiple bank relationships,even today.
10/ Again, our industry is getting big--needs more banks that understand how to manage banking us in a safe & sound way. But there's a risk issue too--right now, there's forced separation between banking & #crypto servicing.

Ironic, since this forced separation CREATES risk.🤦‍♀️
11/ Yep, forcing separation of US$ banking from #crypto servicing into a bank vs a non-bank CREATES risk for both, where it wouldn’t otherwise exist. Our 18-page comment letter goes into painful detail to explain this, focusing esp on resulting risks to the Fed’s payment systems.
12/ If you read it, pls understand Fed’s #1 job isn’t monetary policy--it’s protecting pymt systems against loss. Hence the focus of our letter. It’s also a key reason why #Wyoming #SPDI banks are structured as they are--to minimize pymt system risk for banks that handle #crypto.
13/ I’m a proud “plumber”🪠 of both the #crypto & trad financial systems & @AvantiBT’s amazing team is deep in weeds on these issues. We’re building core industry infrastructure--not only for the crypto industry, but also for the trad payment system’s interface with crypto too.
14/ It’ll be fascinating to see how the Fed handles all this. Of course, the banks want the Fed to block access for anyone who’s not in their club.🥱#Fintechs want payment system access w/o paying the costs of becoming banks.🤔And, by design, #Wyoming #SPDIs thread the needle.🤠
15/ #Wyoming #SPDIs qualify for payment system access while also paying the full freight that banks must pay to gain access, & w/o trying to gain access on technicalities & lower capital & supervisory requirements. Were full-fledged depository institutions, just like trad banks.
16/ Our letter details how #crypto cos obtain US$ banking today. None have it w/ Fed directly. Some qualify for their own US bank accts; all others must go indirect via offshore #eurodollar banks or via multi-layered fintech-to-fintech-to-bank arrangements (hence, layers of fees)
17/ This isn't ideal for either #crypto companies or the Fed itself. Fed can’t monitor latent risks to the payment system, & crypto cos must pay layers of fees + face lack of reliable banking access. And then there’s settlement risk, which I detailed here
forbes.com/sites/caitlinl…
18/ There are HUGE differences in settlement speed & irreversibility btwn #crypto & US$, which creates bank run risk for banks handling crypto. The issue isn’t #Bitcoin, #Ethereum or other crypto protocols--they’re just fine.💪The risk comes from the banks’ operational processes.
19/ As a reminder, I agree w/ @nickszabo4: ”Liquid markets are helpful but not absolutely necessary to this core function [#storeofvalue].”

Liquid mkts are nice for #BTC but an on/off-ramp is all that's really needed. US$ access matters (even to maxis).
20/ With this in mind, it’s important to understand the history of the #Wyoming #SPDI charter. Originally it was proposed as a mutual bank, owned by its members, in keeping with the ethos of #Bitcoin. The Wyoming legislators wanted it to be for-profit & changed that.
21/ There’s a lot more history to #Wyoming #SPDIs that I won’t go into now. Maybe it will all come out someday. Already there’s enough to fill a book about this journey to date. But we have bigger priorities right now. Storytelling can wait until we know how it all ends!
22/ Special shout-out to @AvantiBT’s amazing team & shareholders + our supporters who have pledged to be with us for this whole journey. Same goes for @krakenfx & WDTFinancial, both of whom are chartered #SPDIs & also waiting for Fed pymt system access...
23/ ...+ the many other #crypto cos watching to see if Fed opens up this pathway so others can follow. We’ll know soon. Special shout-outs to @GovernorGordon, @SenLummis, Gov Mead & entire #Wyoming legislature who made it possible. A lot is riding on Fed’s decision. Let's roll!🤠
PS -- link to our comment letter is here: avantibank.com/press/avanti-s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Long 🔑

Caitlin Long 🔑 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CaitlinLong_

29 Jun
1/ ANOTHER STABLECOIN SPEECH by ex-BOE/BOC head Mark Carney--he was surprisingly direct:
* #stablecoins shld have access to central bank's balance sheet;
* "existing bank-based payment rails are expensive, even if those costs aren't visible to consumers"
bis.org/events/acrocke…
2/
* "banks are a means to an end, not ends in themselves, & they'll have to adapt to a much more competitive environment" [WOW, SPICY]

* "any systemic pymt system must be overseen by a central bank & have final settlement option in public money"
3/
* "regulatory model for #stablecoins must offer equivalent protections to commercial bank money" to include:
-legal claim paid in fiat upon demand
-capital rqmts
-liquidity rqmts
-central bank access terms
-backstop if failure
Read 5 tweets
25 Jun
1/ IT MAY SURPRISE YOU that, as a #bitcoiner, I think @BIS_org's proposed 1:1 capital rqmnt for #bitcoin is TOO LOW & view banks entering bitcoin trading as bad for banks & bitcoin's price volatility. The problem isn't Bitcoin--it's the banks.@ForbesCrypto
forbes.com/sites/caitlinl…
2/ @BIS_org's capital proposal completely missed biggest issue w/ banks holding #bitcoin on-balance sheet: settlement risk. Traditional banks are simply not set up operationally or technologically to hold on-balance sheet assets that settle in minutes w/ irreversibility.
3/ Many spoke out that the 1:1 capital rqmt was too high. But the opposite is true. The Basel III framework isn't set up to assess settlement risk. It doesn't have to, bc there are all kinds of operational fault tolerance mechanisms built into traditional financial markets.
Read 18 tweets
18 Jun
1/ NOT MUCH HAS BEEN WRITTEN yet abt this #stablecoin paper by @bankofengland June 7. I'm just getting to it. Big deal.🧐"HMT propose to bring systemic #stablecoins into BOE's regulatory remit, in line w/ its responsibilities for systemic payments systems"
bankofengland.co.uk/paper/2021/new…
2/ Yep, I've warned this is an issue central bankers have w/ #stablecoins issued by non-banks:

"A large-scale displacement of commercial bank money by new forms of digital money cld mean a higher fraction of money in economy backed by high-quality liquid assets (HQLA)."
3/ "Commercial banks would have to adapt their balance sheets in response to deposits leaving the banking system...the Bank may wish to limit migration, so financial system could adjust to the presence of new forms of digital money in an orderly fashion." Oh boy, BOE went there.
Read 13 tweets
9 Jun
🧐 Wow this is #ElSalvador’s proposed #bitcoin-as-legal-tender law, English translation
"Article 7: Every economic agent must accept #bitcoin as payment when offered to him by whoever acquires a good or service."

"Article 13: All obligations in money expressed in USD, existing before the effective date of this law, may be paid in #bitcoin."
"Art 14: ...the State will guarantee, thru the creation of a trust at the Banco de Desarrollo de ElSalvador, the automatic & instantaneous convertibility of #bitcoin to USD necessary for the alternatives provided by the State in Art 8."

Oh boy, I see practical problems here tho
Read 5 tweets
8 Jun
1/ I'M PSYCHED to announce new advisors for @AvantiBT, helping design & build services for traditional institutional investors & corporate treasurers, incl @Ford's former treasurer, Neil Schloss, Ford's ex-treasury IT head Bob Cullinan & ex-@blackrock managing director Tim Keefe.
2/ "I see @AvantiBT’s solutions as potential game changers for corporate treasurers."--Neil Schloss, ex-Treasurer of @Ford. "Avanti is building API-based payment solutions...to solve day-to-day problems by seamlessly integrating payments processes w/ treasury cash mgmt systems."
3/ It's a thrill to bring these 3 accomplished execs into @AvantiBT's fold. Tim Keefe is one of the smartest portfolio managers w/ whom I've ever worked, dating back to 1997. He's now "all-in" on #bitcoin & a founder at @LedgerstatC & partner at @OffTheChainCap.
Read 6 tweets
6 Jun
1/ WELL WRITTEN article--thx @Vlajournaliste. A couple of key points: "The assumption that #WallSt matters to #bitcoin is a fallacy because the information frontier is not in New York. It's not in Silicon Valley either. These mkts are decentralized."
businessinsider.com/bitcoin-invest…
2/ "It means at the end of the day that Wall Street will never be able to have [central] clearing for digital assets," she said, "because Wall Street will never be able to get its hands on a sufficient amount of the collateral to create a true clearinghouse."
3/ "She explains that 75% to 80% of #bitcoin and ether, on average, are held by individuals rather than intermediaries, and during bull markets, even less crypto is held by intermediaries." (h/t @nic__carter)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(