Odd how? Firstly, because almost no-one is now talking about a meat tax. Why? Because a bunch of research over the last few years has shown how eye-wateringly unpopular it would be - so it's basically off the political menu
For example the recent Citizens' Assembly concluded dietary changes should be voluntary and achieved through education and choices, not compulsion - helping local farms along the way, and not penalising the poor climateassembly.uk/report/read/fi…
Odd secondly in highlighting that Conservative voters are less likely to switch from meat than voters for other parties. Well - duh! Conservative voters tend to be more - erm - conservative - the clue is in the name. Seriously not news
...which, by the way, matters not a jot in decarbonisation terms because 1.5°C scenarios do not prescribe an end to all meat consumption, as some claim, but a reduction in red meat consumption across society. Plenty of room for plenty of people to still eat meat if they choose
Added to which, the idea that there is a culture war over the environment in the real world outside Fleet Street's imagination is for the fairies. Tactics of @ExtinctionR are divisive, but they don't own the agenda -
- the consensus in favour of tackling climate change, accelerating renewables, conserving nature, the UK being a world leader, etc etc etc are massive, cross-society and consistent. What culture war?
So if a meat tax is off the menu, a new front isn't brewing, it doesn't matter that much and there is no culture war anyway, why would anyone commission a survey on it and communicate that survey as though it were a major issue?
The only conclusion that makes sense to me is that whoever's behind it wants a culture war over meat, and wants it to have a party political flavour. I see no other explanation that makes sense. What do you say. @Lexcommuk?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Important new paper from the man whose work @thegwpfcom cites as evidence that offshore wind costs are not falling, clarifying that his work shows nothing of the kind sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Two years ago John Aldersey-Williams of @redfieldconsult and @RobertGordonUni showed that the apparent levelised cost of electricity from operating offshore wind farms, derived from company accounts, was in some cases higher than the strike prices agreed in recent #CFD auctions
That paper covered wind farms commissioned as far back as 2003 (North Hoyle), long before the current competitive #CFD auctions came in. It found no trend in costs, either up or down, instead concluding that costs varied between individual projects depending on circumstances
Pleased and proud to be launching today the first systematic assessment of #NetZero targets across nations, states & regions, cities and corporates, asking not only how far they cover emissions, population and GDP, but how rigorous they are
Undoubtedly the day's biggest news bar none... President Xi Jinping says China '...aims to have CO2 emissions peak before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060'. It's the world's biggest carbon emitter, so it matters - in several ways
(By the way, because translations can lose important nuances I've pasted the wording above straight from Xinhua, which ought to know) xinhuanet.com/english/2020-0…
First, China is the world's biggest emitter of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas which causes climate change, and of all greenhouse gases put together
Few thoughts on Making Mission Possible, the bumper #netzero report out this morning from @ETC_energy
As the title implies the Commission (which includes a vast array of super-sized businesses such as Tata, Shell, Rio Tinto...) concludes global #netzero is abundantly possible, and govts and businesses should set course for it - 2050 for richer nations, 2060 for the remainder
(That's compatible with the #ParisAgreement 1.5ºC commitment btw, as they're talking about neutrality for all greenhouse gases not just CO2)
To tell the story, here's your host for the evening - Brick
So yes, emissions are down this year. But, as Brick relays, because global warming is related to the total CO2 we emit over centuries, 2020 is still a year that warmed the climate of the immediate future...
Ten top takeaways from this morning's @theCCCuk Progress Report - delivered into a unique triple context - the #Covid_19 crisis, UK being off-track to its legally-binding 2050 #netzero emissions target, and the UK's hosting of the next, seminal UN climate summit #COP26
1) UK will get triple win from post-Covid stimulus packages aligned with net zero - jobs, levelling-up & climate. Report surveys 13 analyses from eg @CBItweets, @WorldBank & @ETC_energy & concludes 'green' measures can produce more jobs & more local growth faster than others
2) Stimulus packages should not lock in climate risk or reward: "Public money should not support industries or infrastructure in a way that is not consistent with the future #netzero economy or that increase exposure to climate risks.” Implications for airlines, North Sea?