Edwards on #FOI: "For some requests, I think it is legitimate to ask a requester to meet the cost of some of that administration. Otherwise, you see, there is a potential for cross-subsidisation of people who are over-using or even abusing those rights …"
Not great.
But I see what happened here. @KevinBrennanMP was asking Edwards (at 10:56) about Government funding of ICO's #FOI work – and whether that presented a conflict. Edwards misunderstood and responded with a view on the cost burden to public bodies. (Brennan circles back at 11:00.)
"One of things that I think I would be interested in working with Cabinet Office and others in Government [about] is the extent to which fostering a culture of proactive release of information might help with some of the bottlenecks described …"
*looks to camera*
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
UK launches data reform to boost innovation, economic growth and protect the public gov.uk/government/new… | @DCMS press release with link to a "wide-ranging consultation on proposed changes to the UK's data landscape" gov.uk/government/con… (currently 404) | #dataprotection
Good to see this. My recommendation: the new UK #dataprotection law should include reduced record-keeping requirements for organisations with fewer than 250 employees, and also more generally encourage the ICO to take account of the specific needs of SMEs. #UKGDPR#datareform
The GC's list includes some useful datasets, but also quite a few errors. The effect is to overstate the number of #opendata resources that are readily available for the purposes of housing and planning in the UK.
I'll just run through some of the licensing issues …
2/n
The "Open MasterMap" products and APIs mentioned in today's announcement will go live in summer 2020, so there's no #opendata you can download right away.
We don't yet have full specs either. For example OS is still validating its proposal for the Open USRN dataset.