NOT ENOUGH: The @NYCCouncil just passed the first U.S. law regarding fairness of AI-based hiring tools. @CenDemTech commends the Council for focusing on this key issue – but the bill falls far short.
@NYCCouncil The bill has several fatal flaws. Most egregious? It requires companies to audit for discrimination only on the basis of race or gender - ignoring that #AI hiring tools can discriminate on #disability, age, & other features too.
@NYCCouncil Because federal regulations already require employers to test for disparate impacts on sex & race, the @NYCCouncil bill doesn't actually require employers to do anything they aren't already required to do.
* Only applies to hiring + promotion; not to other major employment decisions (pay, scheduling, etc.)
* Only applies to workers who reside in NY; not the numerous non-NYC residents employed by NYC employers
@NYCCouncil * Most troubling – the revised bill stripped @NYCCHR’s authority to issue rules interpreting the new law. That means it's unclear whether or how the major gaps and weaknesses in the @NYCCouncil bill could be addressed later.
@NYCCouncil@NYCCHR The bill does have some positive requirements that align w/ CDT recommendations for notice & disclosure. Employers have to tell applicants that they will be evaluated by an automated tool, explain what the tool is supposed to measure, & give the option to request an alternative.
@NYCCouncil@NYCCHR .@CenDemTech has advocated for notice & alternative testing methods for a long time. But the bill’s requirements are vague, and there’s no mechanism to ensure alternative tests or requests for accommodation are seriously considered, much less fairly offered.
@NYCCouncil@NYCCHR We hope lawmakers continue to focus on this issue, but when they do they need to address the full range of harms. In the meantime, @CenDemTech stands ready to engage with workers, employers, the public, & policymakers regarding #AI#hiring tools & the best ways to approach them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🎒 NEW RESEARCH: CDT’s just-released report discusses parent, teacher, & student views on #edtech and #studentdata. The research found that growing student privacy risks prompt these stakeholders to seek more active roles in school technology decisions:
The report, authored by @HughGrantChap & @elizabethan and based on national surveys conducted this summer, identifies emerging trends in edtech & school data use related to privacy concerns, disciplinary practices, equity, teacher training, and community engagement.
@HughGrantChap@elizabethan Building on prior @CenDemTech research from summer 2020 & spring 2021, the report identifies key trends in changing attitudes. For instance, parent concern about student privacy and security protection has risen since the spring, growing from 60% in February 2021 to 69% in July.
🚨 BREAKING: Today, we've taken a critical & necessary stand for the First Amendment. @CenDemTech filed a lawsuit against @POTUS' “Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship,” which violates 1A by chilling constitutionally protected speech of online platforms & individuals.
@POTUS .@AlexReeveGivens: “@POTUS’ Order is designed to deter social media services from fighting #misinformation, voter suppression & stoking of violence on their platforms. Access to accurate info about the voting process & security of our elections is the lifeblood of our democracy."
@POTUS@AlexReeveGivens .@AlexReeveGivens: "@POTUS has made clear his goal is to use threats of retaliation & future regulation to intimidate intermediaries into changing how they moderate content, essentially ensuring dangers of voter suppression & #disinformation grow unchecked in an election year.”