One of the trends I’m seeing when it comes to covid vaccines in kids is the idea that there’s some nebulous, long term harm we will see with the vaccines that we won’t see with the virus. But this really makes no sense.
I’ve detailed in past posts here and on IG why there’s no biological or historical reason to believe this. The idea that long term scary things happen from vaccines is a figment of anti vaccine propaganda.
But here’s the thing: we don’t even need to sit and weigh the harms of covid infection vs the possible effects of a vaccine. Like at all! Why? Because the vaccine creates the exact same spike protein as the virus.
With the virus, there are countless more harmful substances and responses your body sees. But it also still sees the spike protein!
It’s NOT risks of vaccine versus risk of covid. What it actually is? The risks of a vaccine vs. risks of a vaccine PLUS serious risks of the virus
Anyone pushing hypothetical vaccine risks without understanding and acknowledging this is, whether they mean to or not, creating a misleading argument that tempers vaccine enthusiasm.
It’s okay to refuse to overcomplicate things. All vaccines are better than the diseases they prevent. Yes, always, all of them, including the covid vaccine.
I keep seeing hot takes on how covid affects kids + if it’s dangerous for them.
But amazingly there’s still a striking shortage of pediatrician voices given the opportunity to provide our nuanced and expert opinion.
What would we say if you asked us?
A thread 🧵
Pediatricians have a lot to say about the covid in kids, how to balance the risks and benefits of exposure, and how to make personal + public health decisions that prioritize the needs of children.
What would we say if asked how dangerous covid is for kids?
We’d ditch glib mortality statistics that dress up data as science + paint a more complicated picture.
We’d reassure you that children continue to mostly do well with acute covid. We’d then explain that deaths + hospitalization from acute covid are just part of the equation.
I’ve been bombarded with DMs, comments, articles arguing for a back to normal for kids that ditches all masks for kids + insists covid isn’t bad for them.
The main tactic is the same old using stats + missing the big picture to ultimately argue covid isn’t dangerous for kids
The reality of covid risk to kids is much messier. It involves understanding the complexities of mortality rates, how all children deserve to live a life free of vaccine-preventable disease, how the known + unknown long term effects scare pediatricians more than acute disease
While the real biostatisticians get back to me here’s a #tweetorial on why it’s super important to be careful in how doctors, people, anyone interprets #covid test or antibody results. Hope it helps in the hospitals 🏥, doctors offices, ppl deciding if testing makes sense
I declined antibody testing until I was able to enroll in a study where my results would be useful and checked longitudinally. Convinced my husband to decline too. We started with a quick review of sensitivity and specificity which he understood from college/news
Working w this basic understanding I used the example of a pregnancy test that is 99 percent accurate- aka has a specificity of 99 percent. That means that if you took 100 not pregnant women, 99 would have a negative test and one a false positive, right?