This 30ish woman of mean height has a recurrent right spontaneous #PTX 18 months after the first. She has a history of thoracic pain receiving spinal steroid injections; o/w healthy. The best way to get the #diagnosis is (poll next)
Both #PTX were associated with menses, so by definition they're #catamenial; it does not necessarily follow that they're associated with #thoracicendometriosis#endometriosis; and indeed #VATS did not show demonstrable endometriosis (sensitivity unknown).
Spontaneous PTX in women is rare, with a reported incidence of about 1/100,000 person-years. By our operationalized definition of common vs rare diseases for the purposes of diagnosis, it's rare (single digit incidence per 100,000 PY): see onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…@CallahanPulm
About 3-6% of #spontaneouspneumothorax in women are d/t #thoracicendometriosis, making it extremely rare to encounter it, out of the blue (1/100,000*0.03=.03/100,000, way below single digits, and more rare than #pheochromocytoma). Almost nobody will ever encounter one, right?
Indeed, if the PTX is catamenial, meaning occurring within 72 hours of the onset of menses, the majority of the PTX are due to #thoracicendometriosis according to some series. So the odds were that this is thoracic endometriosis; negative VATS reduces that, but not to zero
(Note however the role of chance in assigning a PTX as catamenial: 3 days after the onset of menses means that 3/30 or 10% of PTX will occur within that window each month *by chance alone*)
This is all similar to #antisynthetasesyndrome associated #interstitiallungdisease#ILD which is very rare overall. However, even if it's only 1% of ILD, and you condition on the presence of ILD, that's 1000/100,000 ILD patients per year...
Write this down: “The purpose of daily rounds & presentation (& progress note) is to *document the behavior of the disease under observation and treatment*.” This is the paramount philosophical purpose. You can include superfluous and redundant boilerplate (eg RRR no MGR no CCE)
But your presentation MUST contain all the data from the patient/exam/labs etc which allow an assessment (explicit or intuitive) of whether the patient is getting better or worse or not progressing, whether the expected is happening or not, & whether there r unexpected findings
Ideally, these rspecific to the pt & the disease rather than routine claptrap; if your patient has #complicatedPPE, the output of the chest tube will have a central position in the presentation; if it’s asthma, wheezing, RR, acc mm use. Tailor ur assessment to the disease….
#pleuraldisease is fascinating and nuanced. First step is #lightscriteria which give favor to finding #exudates which tend to be more urgent. You only need one criterion, which maximizes #sensitivity. Meaningless statement: "It's an exudate only by protein." One criterion=exudate
(Like on Tinder, the more criteria you require, the more you narrow your pool, compromising sensitivity for specificity.) Transudates I will skip over. Most common #exudate is #parapneumoniceffusion#PPE. If there is or is likely to be #pneumonia, it's PPE. Next task is to...
“Research finds that the best people at making predictions (did you know that there are prediction tournaments?) aren’t those who are smartest but rather those who weigh evidence dispassionately and are willing to change their minds.” #cromwellsrulenytimes.com/2021/03/03/opi…
“Likewise, math whizzes excel at interpreting data — but only so long as the topic is banal, like skin rashes. A study found that when the topic was a hot one they cared about, like gun policy, they blundered. Passion swamped expertise.”
“There are a number of biases in play, including the “I’m not biased” bias. That’s when we believe we’re more objective than others, and it particularly traps intelligent people.”
Floating the big yellow bird today. (#swanganz#SCG#PAC). Always remember to “lift it, flick it, flush it” and watch the results on the monitor before you set it a sail to make sure you’re on the right channel and you’re scale is correct. #zentensivist@doc_BLocke
Irony is I get flask for not doing bronchs where I rarely find anything and I get flak for doing Swans where, as in this case, I often find useful things
To elaborate on “lift it flick it flush it” just in case it’s not obvious: b/f you float the swan, check it’s response on the monitor: lift it (the tip) 10 cm & see if baseline rises accordingly on the monitor; flick the tip to see if you get deflections; then flush it to see if