/1

A thread on credit creation, money supply, and how the printer does (and doesn't) go brrrr πŸ§΅πŸ–¨πŸ’ΈπŸ‘‡

First, banks don’t lend reserves – banks make a loan first, then they find reserves second (if necessary)...

#monetarypolicy #FederalReserve #Fed
/2

If a bank extends a new loan, it creates a loan asset and a deposit liability on their balance sheet βš–οΈ:

loan deposit
πŸ“„ πŸ’΅
asset liability

/3

The bank only needs reserves against that loan in case the borrower wants to move his deposit to another bank:

e.g. A borrower from Bank ABC is a construction co who needs to buy materials from a supplier whose checking account is at Bank XYZ...

πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈβ†”οΈπŸ’β€β™€οΈ
πŸ’Έβ†”οΈπŸͺ΅
/4

... so Bank ABC 🏦 moves both a deposit liability πŸ’Έ and an equivalent reserve asset 🧾 to Bank XYZ 🏒 in order to settle the payment:

πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈβ†”οΈπŸ’β€β™€οΈ
πŸ’Έβ†”οΈπŸͺ΅
=
🏦➑🏒
🧾➑️πŸ“₯
/5

Banks are allowed to hold fractional reserves (bank assets) cuz all of their customers, in aggregate, are unlikely to move all of their deposits (bank liabilities) to another bank simultaneously – e.g. a "run on the bank" (for which we now have backstops like FDIC)...
/6

… plus, if both the construction co and his supplier have checking accounts at the same bank (e.g. Bank ABC), then no reserves necessary to settle a payment fm πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈβž‘οΈπŸ’β€β™€οΈ:

The deposit liability just shifts fm πŸ‘·β€β™‚οΈ's to πŸ’β€β™€οΈ's account, so Bank ABC’s reserve assets are irrelevant πŸ™Œ
/7

Fractional reserves are only required because regulators want to make sure every bank has enough for any reasonable amount of customer transfers/withdrawals from one bank to another (again, transfers from one customer to another within the same bank don't require reserves)...
/8

After Bank ABC has made a loan (🀝=πŸ“„βš–οΈπŸ’΅), it can then acquire the required fractional reserves from a number of means, including:

β€’ idle reserves on its own balance sheet (🏦🧾);

β€’ the interbank market (Fed Funds πŸ¦β¬…οΈπŸ§ΎπŸ’); or

β€’ the Fed (Discount Window πŸ¦β¬…οΈπŸ§ΎπŸŽ©)
/9

Yes, Bank ABC borrowing from the Fed Discount Window creates new reserves πŸͺ„πŸ§Ύ...

but those reserves are both collateralized (e.g. the bank has to swap Tbill assets from its own balance sheet in exchange for the reserves πŸ¦πŸŽ«β†”οΈπŸ§ΎπŸŽ©) and relatively expensive...
/10

... so Bank ABC better make sure it’s loan asset is good enough to pay it more than the cost of borrowing from the Fed – or it can find cheaper sources of reserves πŸ‘‡
/11

... to replace expensive reserves from Fed, Bank ABC can try:

β€’ interbank mkt (Fed Funds πŸ¦β¬…οΈπŸ§ΎπŸ’);

β€’ attract new customer deposits+reserves from another bank (πŸ¦β¬…οΈπŸ§ΎπŸ’ΈπŸ’πŸ§”πŸ»); or

β€’ raise capital from equity/bond investors (also comes with deposits+reserves πŸ¦πŸŽ«β†”οΈπŸ§ΎπŸ’ΈπŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦)
/12

All these banks making all these balance sheet management decisions is a very distributed system of money/credit creation, for which banks are constrained since required reserves acquired on unsecured basis (e.g. printed ex nihilo/by fiat πŸͺ„πŸ§Ύ) are prohibitively expensive…
/13

Each bank has to manage its own cost of liabilities (e.g. deposits or debt) vs return on assets (e.g. loans) βš–οΈ...

Reserve assets have little-to-no rate of return – they usually weigh on Bank ABC in either nominal (expensive Discount WindowπŸ₯΅) or real (inflationπŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ) terms...
/14

... but the Fed can choose to pay banks interest on required or excess reserves (IOER), which are monetary policy means of toggling credit creation by changing banks’ IRR equations βš–οΈ and opportunity costs (e.g. IOER from sitting on excess reserves vs ROA from lending)
/15

Again, banks are incentivized to not indiscriminatly lend/create credit, because:

β€’ Bank ABC needs to squeeze a required rate of return from its assets (loans/reserves/Tbills) less its liabilities (debt/deposits)βš–οΈ;

β€’ Fed is constantly rebalancing that systemic spread
/16

If a Bank ABC loan asset defaults πŸ“„πŸ“‰, it won't receive future deposits+reserves that it needs (from borrower's P&I repayments), so it will eventually have to deplete or acquire other reserve assets to honor other customers' transfers to other banks...
/17

... all else equal, loan asset impairment πŸ“„πŸ“‰ hurts the value of Bank ABC's capital base (βš–οΈequity = assets - liabilities)

... too much loan asset impairment πŸ“„πŸ’₯ wipes out the bank's capital – and it won't be able to sustainably source new capital:
/18

These foundational banking/finance misunderstandings are important knowledge for Bitcoin, crypto, inflationistas, nihilists, etcπŸ‘‡

πŸ…°οΈ money supply:

πŸ…±οΈ monetary velocity:

πŸ…ΎοΈ quantitative easing (QE):
/19

… since it would be nice to avert the wrongheaded misadventures that result from such misunderstandings:
... other sources πŸ‘‡

β€’ "banks don't lend out reserves": hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/…

β€’ The Fed, reserve management, and monetary policy tools: frbsf.org/education/publ…

🏁

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Anthony Bardaro

Anthony Bardaro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnthPB

26 Mar 21
@sheeraf @CaseyNewton would love to continue our convo – had two questions:

1️⃣ scale legal system to exact individual user liability (in cases of legal abuse a la brandenburg or libel)?

2️⃣ more democratic solution for everything else (instead of centralized corporate arbiters)?
... I proposed arbitration as least bad solution for 1️⃣ and @sheeraf's Myanmar example was best exhibit of what I called the "geopolitical problem"

... but can we talk about the US only for a sec?
... I know, 'home country bias', etc; but 1️⃣ is in the spirit of domestic progress on these issues in light of congressional hearings – specifically the *legal* aspects of free speech on social media per US law – so I wanted to focus on that
Read 4 tweets
29 Jan 21
"Apple CEO Tim Cook links Facebook's business model to real-world violence"

...yeah like Uighurs concentration camps – wouldn't want that πŸ€₯

cnbc.com/2021/01/28/app…
... this dood has revealed himself to be a rare turd:
... a massive turd:

"a naively optimistic perception
fueled by a false narrative (vs an inevitably flawed reality) is the more dangerous of the two... a la Tim Cook and Apple"

Read 12 tweets
29 Dec 20
Empirical research about index fund flows, ETFs, and a self-reinforcing size factor bias...
$SPY $VOO $IWB $IWM #distortion #distortedmarkets
... a 1-sigma spike in fund flows predicts +3.5pp outperformance for size ("SMB" = small minus big)
... dollar volume matters as much as (if not more than) market cap:

e.g. speculators in singlenames can be marginal buyers inflating prices (with asymmetric size bias due to bandwagon a la $aapl $tsla) by reducing supply for more structural ETF demand

Read 4 tweets
23 Dec 20
$arkk $arkg becoming the dog wagging the tail...
... more $arkk pieces from this week:

@DaveNadig interview with ARK COO did a deep dive into the ETF family's liquidity/capacity hypotheticals (spoiler alert: ARK's ETF-mandated transparency means investors are buying $arkk, et al to own the underlying)

etftrends.com/ark-coo-tom-st…
Read 19 tweets
13 Nov 20
Good story about Van Halen, Sammy Hagar, and brands/branding from @trengriffin's 25iq archives...

25iq.com/2018/01/06/sam…
... reminds me that "Brand" (in the financial sense) is the dark matter of financial modeling and valuation

... if no other quantitative measure can explain an asset's relative premium, then we often simply drop that premium in the intangible goodwill bucket

#brands #branding
... which reminds me that we should be reporting CAC and eLTV, while capitalizing most R&D!
Read 8 tweets
10 Oct 20
/1 One caveat to this @Jesse_Livermore and @patrick_oshag...

Friedman's maxim "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon" is somewhat apt here -- albeit somewhat inaccurate in its original context (i.e. money supply causation)...

/2 @Jesse_Livermore correctly draws a line between fiscal and monetary stimulus vis a vis inflation...

However, we did not see much spending or inflation spike after the 2008 or 2020 fiscal stimuli because of *expectations*...
/3 @ReformedBroker made observations similar to yours in his recent post (thereformedbroker.com/2020/10/07/les…)...

and it *sounds* correct because of what we know about marginal propensity to consume vs save (MPC vs MPS) from classical econ...

but it's *not* accurate in COVID-19 economy... Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(