Thread by @elisaperego78

Bad opinion piece in @guardian trying to prime people, in my opinion, to accept mass infection | death | #LongCovid
The overall argument is that in view of "naive" [sic] zero covid policy, Australians are now having "anxiety" to accept infection

🧵
theguardian.com/australia-news…

To be absolutely clear: • mass infection with a SARS virus is a deranged, dangerous policy that will result in lasting health problems in many of those infected. Being worried about mass infection with SARS-CoV-2 is absolutely right

#LongCovid

• a poorly controlled SARS-CoV-2 spread will bring about social, economic, healthcare and personal disruption. The amount and gravity of this will depend on how the spread will be managed. But it is absolutely appropriate to be concerned and worried about it

#LongCovid

• zero | no covid policies aren't naive. They are smart, appropriate and intelligent. If zero covid | hard containment had been implemented globally, we would have saved millions of human lives and prevented a monstrous wave of disability | #LongCovid | social disruption

A reminder that the scope of healthcare | public health policy should be to prevent disease spread and related fatalities. Some of bravest and most visionary efforts in medicine and public health brought us to smallpox eradication (other diseases are candidates | close)

I am worried and saddened by the huge failure of public health and policy making in controlling the covid-19 emergency: the lack of courage and vision, the petty interests, the lies, the incompetence, the fear to take action

#LongCovid

And, yes, we have now vaccination. So hopefully the damage inflicted by SARS-CoV-2 infection will be less severe than in the first waves. But there are many issues that deserve further attention: from #Omicron immune escape properties to vaccine equity. We need to remain vigilant