First, we have to consider these data in view of large hospitalization surges from covid worldwide: 145.000 people are hospitalized today in the US alone. We can't acritically apply data from one context to another. Yet, it's clear many hospitalized patients will suffer long term
It is absolutely evident ---also in view of innumerable studies on hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients--- that SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to prolonged, potentially lifelong, disabling, and life-threatening symptoms and sequelae: #LongCovid
Covid is not mild
A pillar of the Lombardy study is assessment of lung function and impairment. This is because the study is based on hospitalized patients, many | most of which had covid pneumonia. Overtaken Lombardy was mostly hospitalizing those with severe respiratory symptoms and high fever |
The study -- which involved over 800 hospitalized patients who survived acute covid -- also assessed through some screening and questionnaires the persistence of multi-system #LongCovid -- with symptoms that ranged from cognitive impairment to cardiovascular issues
Among severe, hospitalized patients in the acute covid phase: 20% presented mild disability. Increasing levels of disability were seen in other patients. 6 to 12% had moderate disability and 4% presented *severe* disability
We have to remember a few key points. These preliminary data from Lombardy aren't a random sample. First, patients assessed here are *those who survived*. They are severe, but *not* critically ill covid patients. In-hospital mortality in first-wave Lombardy was ~30%
A second key point is: overtaken Lombardy was often leaving severe patients at home, simply because hospitals were too full to accommodate everyone. The patient cohort here, thus, just reflects those who made it to the hospital and were enrolled in a follow up study
Many others, including those with severe covid disease, had never been enrolled in any formal study, or never received any treatment |support. This is because of policy as well as healthcare disruption in Lombardy
"Mild" patients are also left beahind #LongCovid
In view of the above, these data from Lombardy cannot be considered a random sample to assess #LongCovid in a wider cohort across different age and other groups
They do, however, confirm the severe long-term burden in terms of disability and lost life quality from covid
Thanks @FranceskoNew and @docdrugztore for sharing this piece with me in the first place and your ongoing support
I also want to add that these patients received treatment in the acute phase as well as support and assessment in the #LongCovid phase.
The 42% disabled percentage in hospitalized patients is not necessarily *good news* for the non-hospitalized who didn't receive any care.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It remains a SARS virus. It is able to kill and send people to hospital. We know omicron is able to infect with symptomatic, sometimes severe disease even the vaccinated, or those with previous infection. This is *bad*
People who already have #LongCovid, had previous covid but recovered, or still have covid-related subclinical (barely symptomatic damage) could be particularly at risk from a variant which is so good at reinfection.
Are multiple SARS-CoV-2 infections good? I wouldn't bet on it!
Not everyone in the world is vaccinated, or boosted, especially children --- do we *really* want a SARS virus to infect kids unchecked?! People in low-income countries, or marginalised communities, don't have access to vaccination. Not everyone responds optimally to vaccination
Bad opinion piece in @guardian trying to prime people, in my opinion, to accept mass infection | death | #LongCovid
The overall argument is that in view of "naive" [sic] zero covid policy, Australians are now having "anxiety" to accept infection
To be absolutely clear: • mass infection with a SARS virus is a deranged, dangerous policy that will result in lasting health problems in many of those infected. Being worried about mass infection with SARS-CoV-2 is absolutely right
• a poorly controlled SARS-CoV-2 spread will bring about social, economic, healthcare and personal disruption. The amount and gravity of this will depend on how the spread will be managed. But it is absolutely appropriate to be concerned and worried about it
We need to always keep in mind #Omicron's potential to lead to #LongCovid
Many early omicron symptoms have been described as "mild" in the press. Yet, they are potentially signs of growing, severe, prolonged pathology, like neurological impairment and immune dysfunction
We always need to remember covid often starts with a milder prodromal phase (early few days). More severe pathology can develop across the disease course, especially in view of immune dysfunction, neurological impairment and vascular damage ---> #LongCovid
Earlier variants appear to have been more likely to lead to severe pulmonary pathology, with a first peak in the second week --- often dubbed "second week crash". This can also be accompanied by life threatening "silent hypoxia" | barely symptomatic low saturation
This is a scary, concerning, but excellent point we all have to reflect upon --- especially as patients and researchers. We've seen a large amount of erroneous, incorrect views about SARS-CoV-2 coming from public health experts and those in healthcare
These erroneous ideas included comparing covid --- a SARS like disease --- to a "flu" or a "cold" | denial about #LongCovid and the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pediatric patients ----> #LongCovidKids, MIS-C etc. | Denial of airborne transmission #COVIDisAirborne
Promotion of herd immunity and mass infection theories | Great Barrington Declaration | #MildCovid | denial of the multi-system nature of covid, including its vascular, neurological and clotting components | "endemic covid" = mild
Not a positive take, I am afraid, from the @guardian about "endemic covid" and "mild" #Omicron
I don't like calling a "ray of light" a SARS-CoV-2 variant which is spreading at the speed of light, is putting children in hospital, and is killing
It is possible that #Omicron is "milder" on average in the acute pulmonary phase --I say milder, not "mild" --than other variants of concern. But we still don't know in detail about the full spectrum of disease that this VOC can cause in the long-term, especially in #LongCovid
We don't know which long-term trajectory of development this virus will take in months or years. We don't know if #Omicron or other evolving SARS-CoV-2 strains will give rise to new, more dangerous variants. We already know omicron is killing and putting people in hospital
#LongCovid was defined by the patient-advocate-researchers who first identified | named the condition as a prolonged form of severe covid, indeed 🔥
This is in the 2020 peer-reviewed | medical literature
Policy makers are trying to minimize it to promote erroneous policy
For example, prominent #LongCovid researcher Prof. @felicitycallard successfully and powerfully questioned the "mild covid" narrative in a May 2020 academic publication
In "How and Why Patients Made Long Covid" @felicitycallard and I make clear many early #LongCovid advocates | patient researchers had severe, life threatening covid
Many were left at home with no care in extreme conditions. These are real people